Posted on 06/22/2006 11:38:34 AM PDT by jveritas
Since the story broke yesterday about finding 500 Shells of Chemical Weapons in Iraq, shells that contain Sulfur Mustard Gas or Sarin Gas, the Left and their media were quick to dismiss this extremely important find by using the lame excuse that these Chemical weapons Shells were produced before 1991 and hence its not effective anymore because it has much lower quality. However in March 2003 UN report about Iraq Weapons of Mass Destruction there is the following on page 77 (Page 79 of the pdf file), paragraph 1 of the report http://www.un.org/Depts/unmovic/documents/6mar.pdf :
The Sulfur Mustard contained in artillery shells that had been stored for over 12 years, had been found by UNMOVIC to be still of high purity. It is possible that viable filled artillery shells and aerial bombs still remain in Iraq.
The above form the United Nations inspectors and the darling of the Left Hans Blix totally destroy the stupid lies that the Left and their media has been spewing since the breakings new of yesterday. First the UN clearly state in March 2003 that the Mustard gas shells they found are of HIGH QUALITY even it had been STORED FOR OVER 12 YEARS. Second the UN admit that there may still VIABLE i.e. EFFECTIVE Mustrad filled artillery shell hidden in Iraq, and yesterday we learned for a fact that there were indeed 500 Mustard gas artillery shells that were found in Iraq since the removal of Saddam. Also it is safe to conclude that the Mustard Gas shells found after the war are still in high quality and highly effective Chemical weapons.
Another very important fact to add is that Saddam had LIED to the UN inspectors and the world when he said that he had destroyed ALL his Chemical Weapons and other WMD. It does not matter whether these weapons were produced before or after 1991, his job was to destroy it ALL and not hide anything not a one ounce of these WMD, he DID NOT.
I think this would be important to be added to your files. Are we just using the keyword WMD and it will automatically get added?
How about Brit Hume, Fred Barnes, Mort Kondrake, what did they say about this? Thanks.
grrrr .. I need to proof read better
and that you !! = and THANK you !!
Ping
Thanks, I've been trying to convince someone on another thread not to fall for the confusing "degraded" wording. Degraded may mean they're likely to leak or likely not to fly with accurate trajectory, but they're still lethal toxic gasses.
Gee, the MSM says it's much ado about nothing...
Great Work!!
Keep this one on top. Senator Santorum needs some help. MSM will cover this only when they absoluty must.
Great find!! Clearly such chem munitions CAN retain their potency for many years, contrary to what libs have rushed to say........So was the "anonymous Pentagon official" who was utilized so quickly to dismiss the significance of the 500+ chem munitions doing so on the basis of any real inside info, or was it just the typical Clintonista spin? I have to suspect it's the latter...... but surely someone must have been testing these munitions, so maybe the real info exists somewhere in the bureaucracy??
Great find!! Clearly such chem munitions CAN retain their potency for many years, contrary to what libs have rushed to say........So was the "anonymous Pentagon official" who was utilized so quickly to dismiss the significance of the 500+ chem munitions doing so on the basis of any real inside info, or was it just the typical Clintonista spin? I have to suspect it's the latter...... but surely someone must have been testing these munitions, so maybe the real info exists somewhere in the bureaucracy??
( Slaps head really hard to jar brain back into gear... )
I hadn't even thought of using the keyword index- "WMD" sounds good to me!
For the record, I haven't said anything at all about the mustard gas weapons. My comments before were specifically about the sarin agent.
Otherwise, I don't want to discuss this topic any further, so please don't ping me to it again.
LOL... :)
LOL.
Until second before I typed that note to you, I hadn't thought of it either.
But I realize we're going to see lots of articles again about WMD and don't want to bother you for each one. I'll just make sure that WMD is under the keywords and we'll be all set.
"Scott Ritter. Paging Scott Ritter."
didnt reagan deploy pershing IIs not minutemen. the left howled, and where wrong.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.