Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking on Fox Rick Santorum Reading Unclassified Version over 500 Chemical WMDs Found

Posted on 06/21/2006 2:39:13 PM PDT by COUNTrecount

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 501-504 next last
To: pissant

ROFL...It's top secert..If I tell you...

JUST as I was clicking SEND..I saw the typo..knew I'd hear from you on it.. :)


121 posted on 06/21/2006 3:46:32 PM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: I still care
It's just too much of a mantra with them "Bush lied, people died". They will never let it go, truth be darned.

The democrats will not give up that slogan because Clinton lied in court and was fined for it. If they say it enough maybe people might just start to believe it. I've never heard what it was that he is supposed to have lied about.
122 posted on 06/21/2006 3:46:45 PM PDT by chainsaw (We are going to take things away from you-H. Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: soupcon
Like the last group of missiles found in Iraq, these will prove to be from the 1980's and as such, useless. If they were intact and operable, we'd have known about it almost immediately.

I wouldn't rush to judgment. Hoekstra is chairman of the House intelligence committtee. For him to associate himself with this information makes it significant to me. As some have posited on this thread, keeping the information secret may have been intentional fearing that the enemy would either find them or use them.

If the WMD are in artillery shells, that would make them operable assuming the agent hasn't degraded significantly. We also found yellow cake in Iraq and sent it back to the US.

123 posted on 06/21/2006 3:49:18 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: kabar
keeping the information secret may have been intentional fearing that the enemy would either find them or use them

That's a very good point. If its true, the Admin should not be hesitant in pointing it out.

124 posted on 06/21/2006 3:51:14 PM PDT by The Blitherer ("These are not dark days, these are great days." – W. S. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Spanaway Lori
You have my deepest sympathies.

LOL! She's one of the main reasons my wife wanted to move out of California!

125 posted on 06/21/2006 3:51:35 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle

LMAO!!


126 posted on 06/21/2006 3:52:17 PM PDT by TexKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I was on the other thread. ;-)
Bump ya anyway.


127 posted on 06/21/2006 3:54:46 PM PDT by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Santorum on Senate floor now talking about WMD

CSPAN 2


128 posted on 06/21/2006 3:55:42 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Velveeta

You just wanna be with the popular crowd. ;o)


129 posted on 06/21/2006 3:55:53 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

LOL. But to answer your question, I did not hear Rush on the subject.


130 posted on 06/21/2006 3:56:32 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

Document Details WMD Recovered In Iraq, Santorum Says
By Melanie Hunter
CNSNews.com Senior Editor
June 21, 2006

(CNSNews.com) - Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) and Rep. Peter Hoekstra (R-Mich.) announced Wednesday the finding of over 500 munitions or weapons of mass destruction, specifically "sarin- and mustard-filled projectiles," in Iraq.

Reading from unclassified portions of a document developed by the U.S. intelligence community, Santorum said, "Since 2003, coalition forces have recovered approximately 500 weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent. Despite many efforts to locate and destroy Iraq's pre-Gulf War chemical munitions, filled and unfilled pre-Gulf War chemical munitions are assessed to still exist."

According to Santorum, "That means in addition to the 500, there are filled and unfilled munitions still believed to exist within the country."

Reading from the document, Santorum added, "Pre-Gulf War Iraqi chemical weapons could be sold on the Black Market. Use of these weapons by terrorist or insurgent groups would have implications for coalition forces in Iraq. The possibility of use outside of Iraq cannot be ruled out. The most likely munitions remaining are sarin- and mustard-filled projectiles. And I underscore filled."

Santorum said the "purity of the agents inside the munitions depends on many factors, including the manufacturing process, potential additives and environmental storage conditions."

While acknowledging that the agents "degrade over time," the document said that the chemicals "remain hazardous and potentially lethal."

The media has reported that "insurgents and Iraqi groups" want to "acquire and use chemical weapons," Santorum noted.

The Pennsylvania senator called the finding "incredibly" significant.

"The idea that, as my colleagues have repeatedly said in this debate on the other side of the aisle, that there are no weapons of mass destruction is in fact false," Santorum said. "We have found over 500 weapons of mass destruction and in fact have found that there are additional chemical weapons still in the country."

As Cybercast News Service reported on Oct. 6, 2004, the CIA's chief inspector in Iraq provides details that corroborate information contained in 42 pages of Iraqi intelligence documents obtained by CNSNews.com.

The so-called Duelfer report, named for its author, Charles Duelfer, is widely recognized for declaring that no stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction have been found in Iraq. Other details of the report, however, provide a glimpse of what some Iraq experts say is Saddam's attempt to continue to wage war against the U.S. after the first Gulf War ended.

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=/Nation/archive/200606/NAT20060621e.html


131 posted on 06/21/2006 3:56:32 PM PDT by theophilusscribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: dynoman

.


132 posted on 06/21/2006 3:56:33 PM PDT by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: kabar
If the WMD are in artillery shells, that would make them operable assuming the agent hasn't degraded significantly.

I recall when the US destroyed our own stockpiles of chemical weapons. They had been stored for many years, but still were highly dangerous.

133 posted on 06/21/2006 3:57:22 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Santorum live in the Senate on CSPAN2 now talking about this!!!


134 posted on 06/21/2006 3:57:44 PM PDT by TheCornerOffice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle

Oooh, do you have my sympathies. My own family - the part that lives in CA, at any rate - are raving liberals and I always have to pledge to myself that when they visit me here in Florida I WILL NOT ENGAGE. It's pointless, they're so brainwashed by the SF Chron that they have no idea what's going on.

I have to bite my tongue till it bleeds. But I've gotten really good at changing the topic!


135 posted on 06/21/2006 3:58:15 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: theophilusscribe

let me guess, they are already trying to poo poo it?


136 posted on 06/21/2006 4:03:43 PM PDT by beansox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

There are still Chemical weapon shells (Mustard gas) from the First World War that are a significant danger in Belgium.


137 posted on 06/21/2006 4:03:56 PM PDT by usmcobra (A single rogue Marine, yeah that can happen, but a whole Unit, only a liberal would believe that BS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: sageb1

That's a good question. According to the panel on the Brit Hume report tonight, the Administration did not want to go back and visit the WMD issue. Sort of wimpy if you ask me. Another thing, the libs on the show said that these WMD were not the ones the President was talking about when he got us into this war. WMDs are WMDs. What kind of reasoning goes into what libs say?


138 posted on 06/21/2006 4:05:12 PM PDT by conservative blonde (Conservative Blonde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Democrats will just say we had them the whole time, waiting for the right time. "Look at the timing".


139 posted on 06/21/2006 4:05:31 PM PDT by Burlem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

No Shep on Fox News tonight.. Woo Hooo!!! Now if Colmes would get abducted by illegal aliens, we'd be having a red letter day. ;-)
140 posted on 06/21/2006 4:06:07 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Wanna help kick some liberal arse? It's not just a job here at FR, IT's an obsession.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 501-504 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson