Posted on 06/19/2006 2:34:47 PM PDT by Libloather
Scandal Woes Could Benefit Jefferson, Analysts Say
Randy Hall
Staff Writer/Editor
(CNSNews.com) - Losing his seat on the influential Ways and Means Committee and being investigated in a federal bribery probe could actually benefit U.S. Rep. William Jefferson (D-La.), political analysts told Cybercast News Service.
"Oftentimes, being an embattled Louisiana politician can actually be a benefit," said Pearson Cross, assistant professor of political science at the University of Louisiana Lafayette. "If anything, I think voters in the state's 2nd District are going to see him as 'put upon,' that he was unfairly stripped, and I'm certain he's going to spin it that way."
According to Cross, the eight-term congressman is going to say: "I haven't been indicted. I'm not formally charged. This is essentially relieving my district of the representation it needs in the middle of the Katrina cleanup which is ongoing, and it in fact has a deleterious effect on the district."
Cross's remarks echoed comments Jefferson made before the House of Representatives voted Friday to remove him from the Ways and Means Committee, a coveted post because the panel is deeply involved in writing tax laws.
Nevertheless, "getting accused of corruption or bribery or incompetence or just about anything else in Louisiana has never been a bar to holding office - or returning to office," Cross noted. "We've had lots of incidents where people have been convicted, and if they're not forced to leave office by the nature of their crime, then they're just re-elected.
"It's not a shoo-in, but I would expect Jefferson to be re-elected if he's not, in fact, indicted or forced to step down," he added. "This would fit in right with the tradition of struggling Louisiana politicians," which Cross said was most recently demonstrated when Ray Nagin ran for re-election as mayor of New Orleans.
"The more it appeared that Nagin was circling the wagons and under attack and beleaguered, the more his constituency - and by that I mean mostly the black residents of New Orleans - rallied to his support," Cross said.
"Pundits on the outside were looking at [the election] and saying, 'Oh, getting rid of Ray Nagin would be a no-brainer'" due to the city's poor response to the devastation caused by Hurricane Katrina, Cross noted. "It seemed like the tide - if I can use that expression - had swept against Mr. Nagin and would sweep him out of office.
"In fact, that was not the case," Cross said, due to voters' perception that Nagin "was embattled, 'he's one of ours,' 'let's close ranks,' and I would suspect you would see a lot of that surrounding Congressman Jefferson."
Edward Chervenak, assistant professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of New Orleans, told Cybercast News Service that he believes Jefferson's re-election "depends on who steps up to the plate to challenge him."
"So far, I haven't seen any name politicians step up and say, 'Well, this guy's carrying a lot of baggage here. This is a city that needs lots of help right now, and Jefferson's a real distraction,'" Chervenak said.
Incumbents "try and build up a reservoir of good will" between themselves and their constituencies, Chervenak said. "It's not so much about vote choice or stances on the issue, it's about 'I'm here for you. I'm concerned about the district.' If a challenger can undermine that, that makes the incumbent vulnerable."
In Chervenak's opinion, the person most capable of defeating Jefferson in the Nov. 7 election would be someone like Oliver Thomas, Jr., president of the New Orleans City Council. "He has lots of crossover appeal. He's popular in the African-American community as well as the white community."
Jefferson does have a Republican challenger in this fall's election, a lawyer named Joseph Lavigne, though Chervenak noted that 67 percent of voters in the district are registered as Democrats, with only 12 percent as members of the GOP.
Regarding Jefferson's ouster from the Ways and Means Committee on Friday, Chervenak noted that the move had been engineered by House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).
"I guess Pelosi's stance is she wants Democrats to hold a higher standard" because the party is focusing on the "Republican culture of corruption" as an issue for the fall.
Cross agreed, noting that "Jefferson was clearly standing in the way of that, and I think the Democrats felt that to have any chance of taking the House, they had to toss him aside."
"If you're going to run against the 'party of corruption', you can't be the 'party of corruption,'" Cross added.
Jefferson was also the subject of a Cybercast News Service investigation that exposed a possible conflict of interest in his involvement with a charity distributing relief funds after Katrina.
The congressman was also listed on a liberal group's "most corrupt list," but Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean said Jefferson was merely an "errant congressperson," whose woes couldn't be compared to GOP corruption.
Nevertheless, Chervenak said that Jefferson could solve many problems by answering one question: "How are you going to explain $90,000 in your freezer?
"I'm still waiting for that explanation," Chervenak concluded.
Democrats are corrupt. Louisiana democrats are beyond the pale.
Amazing how being caught being corrupt helps a dem.
Now all he has to day is, "The B*tch set me up!"
Why does no one in the media ever notice that being a corrupt POS is a career killer for a GOP politician, but usually enhances a Democrats' standing among their party? Are we the only ones who notice this amoral streak in the Demon party?
Louisiana you say? With the lazy, spineless thinking that happens in that state, note re-election of N.O. mayor, nothing they do would surpize me.
***Cesspool Alert***
Hey, is this like the motto they use every time they lose..."we lost but we declare it a victory"..bawhahahha! Bunch of brain dead RATS!! It must be the gobbles of saccharine these yuppie liberals have ingested through the years!
"Oftentimes, being an embattled Louisiana politician can actually be a benefit,"
That figures.
How's about explaining why there are three felons who say "Yes, we bribed him" and why the FBI says they have video tape of him receiving bribes? Awww, that's just Democrat corruption. It's cute, isn't it? Only Repbulican corruption is bad.
Politicians in Louisiana are corrupt because the majority of the people of Louisiana are corrupt. If they had any morals, they wouldn't keep re-electing these criminals. The only assumption that one can make is that the majority of people in Louisiana elect officials who are just like they are.
Just ask Mayor John Street in Philadelphia.
Or Marion Barry
"So, Louisiana is just another third world cesspool?"
In short, yes, esp. New Orleans...
The MSM fools themselves into thinking they're fair -- hard to believe the stuff they can rationalize... amazing.
Jefferson is a brutha just like Nagin. Blacks will elect and relect them no matter how corrupt they are. What is important to blacks is that the politician be "black".
Even a dog doesn't urinate in their own bed, but this guy's votes just might. Then they wonder why their community is in such shambles.
"Politicians in Louisiana are corrupt because the majority of the people of Louisiana are corrupt."
Having lived here for the past 15 years of my 43 year life, I can assure you that while the majority of citizens in my area that I know are not corrupt, the majority of businesses I've dealt with ARE!
The majority of citizens are lazy thinkers, and gullible.
If a GOP representative is caught with $90K in cold, hard bribes in his freezer, the conservative voters would line up to spit on him.
If a DNC representative is caught with $90K in cold hard bribes in his freezer, the liberal voters line up to shake his hand.
It sounds to me like the GOP has a higher quality of voters than the other party.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.