Posted on 06/19/2006 3:28:26 AM PDT by mainepatsfan
This Day In History | World War II
June 19
1944 United States scores major victory against Japanese in Battle of the Philippine Sea
On this day in 1944, in what would become known as the "Marianas Turkey Shoot," U.S. carrier-based fighters decimate the Japanese Fleet with only a minimum of losses in the Battle of the Philippine Sea.
The security of the Marianas Islands, in the western Pacific, were vital to Japan, which had air bases on Saipan, Tinian, and Guam. U.S. troops were already battling the Japanese on Saipan, having landed there on the 15th. Any further intrusion would leave the Philippine Islands, and Japan itself, vulnerable to U.S. attack. The U.S. Fifth Fleet, commanded by Admiral Raymond Spruance, was on its way west from the Marshall Islands as backup for the invasion of Saipan and the rest of the Marianas. But Japanese Admiral Ozawa Jisaburo decided to challenge the American fleet, ordering 430 of his planes, launched from aircraft carriers, to attack. In what became the greatest carrier battle of the war, the United States, having already picked up the Japanese craft on radar, proceeded to shoot down more than 300 aircraft and sink two Japanese aircraft carriers, losing only 29 of their own planes in the process. It was a described in the aftermath as a "turkey shoot."
Admiral Ozawa, believing his missing planes had landed at their Guam air base, maintained his position in the Philippine Sea, allowing for a second attack of U.S. carrier-based fighter planes, this time commanded by Admiral Mitscher, to shoot down an additional 65 Japanese planes and sink another carrier. In total, the Japanese lost 480 aircraft, three-quarters of its total, not to mention most of its crews. American domination of the Marianas was now a foregone conclusion.
(Excerpt) Read more at historychannel.com ...
I believe MUSHASHI was sunk at the Battle of Leyte Gulf.
"After demonstrating how obsolete the battleship was by their ambush attack on Pearl Harbor, in which they used fast carrier forces, they proceed to put their major navel building emphasis on battleships."
After Midway, Japan built on 7 further aircraft carriers, and some of these were conversions (ships hastily equipped with any form of flight deck. The most famous of these would be the combo BB/CV's the Japanese sent to Leyte Gulf as bait).
In contrast, the United States built over 100 aircraft carriers (CV, CVL and CVE).
American waship production throughout the war outstripped Japan's by a 16:1 margin.
By the end of the war, the United States completed, launched and manned an entire task group equal in strength to the Japanese fleet that attacked Pearl Harbor EVERY FOUR MONTHS.
Japan, along with just about every other nation that has ever attacked us, and some that haven't attacked yet, thought we were soft, without considering how much prodution capability it takes to make our lives as easy as they are.
What was that old saw about those who forget the lessons of history?
Very often, the attitude you speak of is simple racism and chauvanism. On the Japanese part, thais attitude tended to believe that a naturally "martial" people (like the Japanese), or, a people who were "divine" (like the Japanese), could easily outfight and outwit "soft" westerners who did nothing but persue the comforts to be purchased with "stolen" wealth all day.
Little do they know just how much of he knowledge gained in the reckless pursuit of wealth finds it's way into our military strategies and conventions. That mistake usually comes back to haunt them in ways that are not exactly obvious to most folks.
I did get the chance to talk at length with man who was to be an antitank weapon delivery system when we invaded. He was 12 when the war ended, and he had been trained to dive under a tank and detonate his satchel charge. He felt that our use of the atom bomb saved his life.
Could you imagine how differently the war would have gone if the Japanese had their own versions of Henry Kaiser, Jack Northrup, Kelly Johnson or Andrew Higgins?
I'm sure they did have men of this caliber, in terms of technical skill and native genius, but the system under which they had to operate kept them from rising to the occasion.
It's fortunate for us that Japanese culture was such a drag on their overall war effort.
If their culture/government had been more like ours, would they have attacked us, or just buried us economically like everyone said they were going to in the '80's?
Japan could never bury America economically, either in 1941 or 1981. When it comes to sheer industrial potential, no country on earth can match this one, especially a nation that has no native resources of it's own and which (at the time) barely fed itself.
As to whether or not they would have started the war in the first place? I say it's possible they would have, even if Japanese institutions more closely mirrored their western counterparts. After all, Germany and Italy found themselves ruled by conquest-minded madmen, why should Japan have been immune to this? Had civilian authority done the "right" thing and embarrassed the Kwangtung Army, fired and tried it's leaders, and re-established democratic principles in 1931, the entirety of the Pacific War just might have been avoided.
But that's a tall order. Especially given the huge number of assassinations of Japanese civil authorities and political rivals throughought the 1930's. Of course, there's also the question of Hirohito; he could have put the genie back in the bottle with a nod and a wave, but instead followed custom and remained silent (of course, it'spossible HE would have been assassinated, to, if he tried).
Unfortunately, the Meiji Constitution gave the Japanese military a stranglehold on the government, since the War Minister was a military man, and by not nominating one, or having the War Minister resign, the military could prevent a government from forming, or force one to resign.
Try 60 million. World War II: Combatants and Casualties (1937 - 45)
Thanks for the link....I didn't realize that so many Chinese civilians were massacred. I had seen a table years back from which I was referring.
All in all, American losses aboard ship and in planes during the Philippine Sea battle barely numbered 200. Against these must be counted the Japanese lost in Shokaku, Taiho and Hiyo (in each case about two-thirds of the ships company) and the oilers destroyed, as well as in the some 400 planes which were lost from the carriers. It was, all in all, a telling count. Not even at the best of its times had the Japanese Navys air arm inflicted remotely as severe casualties as the U.S. had over the Philippine Sea. American superiority in radar, in fighter strength and proficiency, and mere numerically advantages made any engagement with the U.S. Navy an almost suicidal matter.
"American superiority in radar, in fighter strength and proficiency, and mere numerically advantages made any engagement with the U.S. Navy an almost suicidal matter."
For all that, it still only took one nervous admiral to turn almost certain victory over the Americans to certain defeat at Leyte Gulf.
More info (and good photos) here:
http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/sh-fornv/japan/japsh-m/musashi.htm
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.