Skip to comments.
Sikh bracelets, but no Christian rings at school bans pupils from wearing 'purity rings'
Telegraph ^
| 06/18/06
| Elizabeth Day
Posted on 06/17/2006 6:25:09 PM PDT by bruinbirdman
Sikh bracelets, but no Christian rings at school bans pupils from wearing 'purity rings'
A group of teenage Christians have been banned by a secondary school from wearing "purity rings" as a symbol of their religious belief in chastity until marriage.
At least one of the dozen pupils, who all attend the same girls' comprehensive in Horsham, West Sussex, is considering legal action against the Millais School for "a breach of human rights".
Although the school allows Muslim and Sikh pupils to wear headscarves or kara bracelets as a means of religious expression, the purity ring - a small band of silver engraved with a Biblical verse and worn as a declaration of abstinence from sexual relations - is not allowed because it is considered to be jewellery.
Lydia Playfoot, 15, who started wearing her purity ring to the school in June 2004, described its policy as "really unfair".
"My friends and I have had detentions and been taught in isolation for wearing the ring," she said. "I feel like I've been treated the same as someone who is caught bringing cannabis into school."
The increasing popularity of The Silver Ring Thing, an American Christian movement that launched in Britain in 2004 and promotes abstinence before marriage, has encouraged a growing number of adolescents to make a "pledge of chastity".
The movement's followers wear a silver ring to demonstrate their commitment. More than 20,000 teenagers have signed up at roadshows in America and Britain.
Staff at the Millais School insist, however, that the uniform dress code stipulates that no jewellery is to be worn, other than a small pair of ear studs.
Lydia said that her ring was more than a "trivial" accessory. "My ring is a symbol of my religious faith," she said. . . .
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: abstinence; antichristian; chaste; chastity; christian; christianity; christianstudents; churchandstate; discrimination; dress; dresscode; education; england; faith; highschool; ibertarians; jewellry; jewelry; kid; kids; prejudice; publikskoolz; purity; purityring; ring; rule; rules; school; silverring; silverringthing; teen; teenagers; teens; uk; zerotolerance
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
To: bruinbirdman
"My friends and I have had detentions and been taught in isolation for wearing the ring," I'd wear it just to get away from the other students.
2
posted on
06/17/2006 6:28:39 PM PDT
by
CzarNicky
(In the magical land of unicorns there's no need for clothes.)
To: bruinbirdman
Although the school allows Muslim and Sikh pupils to wear headscarves or kara bracelets as a means of religious expression, the purity ring - a small band of silver engraved with a Biblical verse and worn as a declaration of abstinence from sexual relations - is not allowed because it is considered to be jewellery. And bracelets aren't considered jewelry?
3
posted on
06/17/2006 6:28:47 PM PDT
by
Mr. Mojo
To: bruinbirdman
I think the administration is just trying to make chastity cool.
4
posted on
06/17/2006 6:30:31 PM PDT
by
Tribune7
To: bruinbirdman
The increasing popularity of The Silver Ring Thing........ promotes abstinence before marriage Can't have that.
5
posted on
06/17/2006 6:31:31 PM PDT
by
Skooz
(Chastity prays for me, piety sings...Modesty hides my thighs in her wings...)
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: bruinbirdman
7
posted on
06/17/2006 6:32:37 PM PDT
by
Tabi Katz
To: bruinbirdman
Christians better get their own lobby going. . .the Muslims are winning, big time.
This is so sad; 'too late smart' has already been a painful lesson; and yet. . .what ignorance abounds where Liberals tread. . .
8
posted on
06/17/2006 6:34:00 PM PDT
by
cricket
To: bruinbirdman
I for one am so tired of people thrusting their sex lives - in whatever proclivity, fetish, or lack thereof it is - into the public's face.
It's like your tax forms and what you do in the bathroom - it's PRIVATE and to make it public is tacky.
That said, it surprises me not at all that all other forms of sexual expression is allowed and anything Christian is not. Typical diversity freaks who love diversity until THEY have to tolerate something they don't like.
9
posted on
06/17/2006 6:38:13 PM PDT
by
Lizavetta
To: bruinbirdman
This will never work, what are they supposed to do with all the condoms in the school clinic if everyone starts wearing purity rings???/sarc
To: bruinbirdman
the uniform dress code stipulates that no jewellery is to be worn, other than a small pair of ear studs.
As long as that is equally enforced, I do not see discrimination against these girls. Headscarves are not jewelry.
However, BRACELETS are jewelry, so it is NOT being equally enforced.
11
posted on
06/17/2006 6:41:46 PM PDT
by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It. Supporting our Troops Means Praying for them to Win!)
To: bruinbirdman
Many Christians believe that real Christians wear no adornment of any kind at any time.
Still, I don't recall any particular sect that has ever encouraged "purity rings".
12
posted on
06/17/2006 6:42:54 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
(-)
To: Tribune7
"I think the administration is just trying to make chastity cool."LOL... I wouldn't be surprised if you're right!
13
posted on
06/17/2006 6:46:44 PM PDT
by
Toadman
To: muawiyah
Not *many*, *some* perhaps even very few. Ceratinly none I've ever met.
14
posted on
06/17/2006 6:53:03 PM PDT
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: bruinbirdman
School bans "purity rings"!Typical response by and from a puling administration!
Betcha they won't be proud of that cowardly decision in the future!
15
posted on
06/17/2006 6:55:36 PM PDT
by
VOYAGER
(,)
To: bruinbirdman
16
posted on
06/17/2006 6:57:12 PM PDT
by
Oztrich Boy
(Yes, I am pedantic. Why do you ask?)
To: Mr. Mojo
And bracelets aren't considered jewelry? Will you agree to ban wearing crucifixes at schools?
17
posted on
06/17/2006 7:00:37 PM PDT
by
Oztrich Boy
(Yes, I am pedantic. Why do you ask?)
To: Oztrich Boy
Personally, I don't give a crap what any school decides to ban. I was merely exposing their ridiculous argument that the rings aren't allowed because they're considered jewerly, when kara bracelets (which are obviously jewelry as well) are allowed.
18
posted on
06/17/2006 7:05:27 PM PDT
by
Mr. Mojo
To: cricket
Christians better get their own lobby going. . .the Muslims are winning, big time.How about another Crusades era? :)
Works for me.
19
posted on
06/17/2006 7:08:00 PM PDT
by
Windsong
(Jesus Saves, but Buddha makes incremental backups)
To: bruinbirdman
"At least one of the dozen pupils, who all attend the same girls' comprehensive in Horsham, West Sussex, is considering legal action against the Millais School for "a breach of human rights". "
Go for it!
Put them out of business.
Kids can mutilate their faces and bodies with NO QUESTIONS ASKED but something like THIS is banned?
20
posted on
06/17/2006 7:17:12 PM PDT
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) !)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson