Skip to comments.
Scientists respond to Gore's warnings of climate catastrophe
Canada Free Press ^
| 6/12/06
| Tom Harris
Posted on 06/14/2006 8:03:32 AM PDT by Jack Bull
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
To: aflaak
41
posted on
06/14/2006 9:32:43 AM PDT
by
r-q-tek86
(** Tagline Removed By Admin Moderator **)
To: Jack Bull
To: far sider
Geez, Algore is a dufus. Indeed he is.
Kudos for posting this graphic. It will help readers visualize what a colossal blunder ALGORE is propagating!
Once again, I'm reminded of the disaster we barely escaped in the 2000 Presidential election.
43
posted on
06/14/2006 9:48:43 AM PDT
by
skeptoid
To: BelegStrongbow
44
posted on
06/14/2006 10:16:34 AM PDT
by
Ditto
To: Jack Bull
45
posted on
06/14/2006 10:20:04 AM PDT
by
maine-iac7
(Lincoln: "...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time.")
To: Jack Bull
This article should be titled; The Inconvenient Facts
46
posted on
06/14/2006 10:21:01 AM PDT
by
maine-iac7
(Lincoln: "...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time.")
To: tubebender; Paloma_55; Jack Bull; Boot Hill
I like this Paloma_55 post in conjunction with the Drudge item you found.
Jack Bull and Boot Hill... I just like the sound of those screen names, that's all... Of course my favorite is tubularbender person!!!
47
posted on
06/14/2006 10:35:21 AM PDT
by
SierraWasp
(California is MEXIFORNIA , MANANA!!! The European settlers suffer from GANG-GREEN, TODAY!!!)
To: Jack Bull
An Inconvenient Truth is not so much about global warming as it is about scaring folk into voting for democrats, AlGore in particular.
It won't work in that respect, but it will unfortunately help continue to charade of human-caused catastrophic climate change.
To: Jack Bull
49
posted on
06/14/2006 10:52:01 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islam Factoid:After forcing young girls to watch his men execute their fathers, Muhammad raped them.)
To: Thrusher
You mean you didn't die in the great swine fle epidemic of 1975?
50
posted on
06/14/2006 11:07:27 AM PDT
by
RedMonqey
(Liberal Agenda : "You've got it, I want it, you owe me,")
To: Jack Bull
51
posted on
06/14/2006 1:25:16 PM PDT
by
webster
To: Thrusher
52
posted on
06/14/2006 2:34:39 PM PDT
by
skeptoid
To: windcliff
"Gore's circumstantial arguments are so weak that they are pathetic. It is simply incredible that they, and his film, are commanding public attention."I thought this was the best line in the article. How do you like my highlighted bold text?
To: Jack Bull
Scientists respond to Gore's warnings of climate catastropheAl, go to the bathroom. You've had too much iced tea.
54
posted on
06/14/2006 6:06:01 PM PDT
by
beyond the sea
(Scientists Are Itching to Blame Poison Ivy's Effect on Global Warming)
To: Jack Bull
55
posted on
06/14/2006 7:19:39 PM PDT
by
marvlus
To: Jack Bull
56
posted on
06/14/2006 7:45:56 PM PDT
by
NavVet
(O)
To: MarkeyD
57
posted on
06/14/2006 10:40:19 PM PDT
by
QwertyKPH
(I didn't do it, nobody saw me do it, you can't prove anything!)
To: RightWhale
Someone recently gave me a pointer to a website that discusses the non-circular orbit of the earth around the sun. Apparently it is not only elliptical, but the shape of the ellipse changes from roundish to longish on a period that is coincidental with the global warming periods. The rounder, the warmer, the more elliptical, the cooler. I will try to find that link and add it to my postings on GW in the future.
THAT makes more sense to me.
Ironically, I think C02 production could be our *salvation* in the next cooling cycle if we can actually affect global C02 enough to stabilize the temperature.
58
posted on
06/15/2006 6:17:46 AM PDT
by
Paloma_55
(I may be a hateful bigot, but I still love you)
To: RightWhale
I found it.
It is called the
Orbital Variance Theory
It makes a LOT more sense than man made greenhouse gases especially when you observe that CO2 has been a
lagging indicator related to Global Warming.
59
posted on
06/15/2006 6:22:41 AM PDT
by
Paloma_55
(I may be a hateful bigot, but I still love you)
To: Paloma_55
The length of the year is now measured to very small error. If the radius of the orbit were changing to that extent it would be glaringly obvious. I find all these wobbles to be mysterious, although the precession of the nodes can be calculated from either Newtonian mechanics or relativistic mechanics. There should be an obvious cause of the various wobbles, especially ones that affect the characteristics of earth's orbit itself.
60
posted on
06/15/2006 8:08:26 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Off touch and out of base)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson