Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter Banned in New Jersey?
News mac | 6/10/06

Posted on 06/11/2006 9:24:07 AM PDT by hope

Reprinted from NewsMax.com

Saturday, June 10, 2006 11:50 p.m. EDT

Ann Coulter Banned in New Jersey?

Two New Jersey Democrats are pushing to have Ann Coulter's new book "Godless: The Church of Liberalism," banned from all bookstores in their state because she criticized four 9/11 widows known as "the Jersey Girls."

In a joint press release issued Friday, New Jersey Assemblywomen Joan Quigley and Linda Stender say they want New Jersey retailers to "ban the sale of [Coulter's] book throughout the state."

"Ann Coulter's criticism of 9-11 widows, whose only desire since the attacks have been to repair their shattered lives and protect other families from the horrors they have experienced, is motivated purely by petty greed and hate," the two Democrats complained.

"Coulter's vicious characterizations and remarks are motivated by greed and her desire to sell books . . . She is a leech trying to turn a profit off perverting the suffering of others."

Quigley and Stender conclude:

"No one in New Jersey should buy this book and allow Ann Coulter to profit from her hate-mongering. We are asking New Jersey retailers statewide to stand with us and express their outrage by refusing to carry or sell copies of Coulter's book. Her hate-filled attacks on our 9-11 widows has no place on New Jersey bookshelves."

Get Ann Coulter's new book "Godless: The Church of Liberalism," before Democrats ban it in your state. Click Here.

Editor's note:
Own a piece of authentic Ronald Reagan history – Click Here now!
Wear the USS George Bush fleece jacket – Click Here Now for FREE offer!

Da Vinci Con Exposed - Ann Coulter`s Book FREE - Click Here!

Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:

9/11 Commission
DNC

108-108-103


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; tolerantleft
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 361-362 next last
To: FreeReign
Private citizens can ban and government officials can ask.

Who do you think you're kidding?

In this country, kids praying in school is an establishment of religion, and you're trying to float the notion government official "asking" for a ban is okay?

161 posted on 06/11/2006 10:52:54 AM PDT by papertyger (Evil preys on civility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: MarkL
I'd be promoting her book with "Banned in New Jersey?" headlines!

Excellent idea.

162 posted on 06/11/2006 10:54:41 AM PDT by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: piytar
The problem is that we're not talking about just a couple of citizens here- we're talking about government officials. Technically, they have the right, but it's the type of thing a government official should refrain from doing anyway. There's a much thinner line between public statements and government policy in this case- anyone who genuinely believes in free speech should be careful of starting a very bad precedent.
163 posted on 06/11/2006 10:54:59 AM PDT by Sofa King (A wise man uses compromise as an alternative to defeat. A fool uses it as an alternative to victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Fudd Fan

I went to flight school with a guy from there. He always talked about "Jersey." When he's say "Jersey" he'd do a little thing with his hand on his waist that he called a "swooby." I never could figure that stuff out.


164 posted on 06/11/2006 10:55:25 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (DemocRATS! America's Lynch Mob.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
"Take your exploding cigar and stick it appropriately."

Ok, bend over.

165 posted on 06/11/2006 10:55:59 AM PDT by Enterprise (Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

No worries, arrogance borne of prejudice isn't easy to figure out. People like that want to feel better about themselves by denigrating someone else -- anyone will do.

I hope I never understand it. We should be glad we don't.


166 posted on 06/11/2006 10:59:26 AM PDT by Fudd Fan (Help get Murtha out of Congress- donate at http://www.irey.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
Ok, bend over.

Get lost.

167 posted on 06/11/2006 10:59:45 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Danae
The buzz word is "Hate".

Labeling something as "hate speech" or a "hate crime" they feel trumps freedom of speech.

168 posted on 06/11/2006 11:00:22 AM PDT by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

You get lost first.


169 posted on 06/11/2006 11:01:04 AM PDT by Enterprise (Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: hope

This is the thesis of Anns book. This is proof text to her being correct.


170 posted on 06/11/2006 11:02:33 AM PDT by Texas Songwriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hope
And now you have heard from the Nazi wing of New Jersey politicians or maybe it hits too close to home to have their darlings of the anti-Bush brigade playing to a different tune. It IMO is just NJ political pandering, perhaps if they ever get voted out (ha) they can get jobs in used car lots but they will have to adjust their sights higher or get better scruples?
171 posted on 06/11/2006 11:02:48 AM PDT by SERE_DOC ("9 out of the 10 voices in my head told me to go home & clean my weapons!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
You get lost first.

Look, you explode a cigar in my face and send it right back at you. Simple concept.

You get?

172 posted on 06/11/2006 11:02:49 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Lancer_N3502A
"But where's THEY'RE diversity"

It's over their!!

...there. ;^)

173 posted on 06/11/2006 11:03:41 AM PDT by Landru (That does it, no sleep number for you pal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
Take your exploding cigar and stick it appropriately

Now there's an intelligent argument. Do you even understand what a "slippery slope argument" is? Apparently not, since neither Enterprise or I made one.

174 posted on 06/11/2006 11:04:20 AM PDT by stop_fascism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: jude24
Significantly, however, Mr. Churchill's and Ms. Coulter's comments drove more people away than they convinced.....

Only panty waisted girlymen... which is good.

It's driving up her book sales. I understand Godless is #1 at Amazon.

175 posted on 06/11/2006 11:05:33 AM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("fake but accurate": NY Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: redheadtoo
Regarding the Constitution someone suggested that, " We send it to Iraq. It was written by a bunch of smart guys and has served our country well for almost 200 years. Since we aren't using it anymore we should let Iraq have it!"
176 posted on 06/11/2006 11:07:44 AM PDT by dvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: jude24
Why do you consider the truth "tasteless"? If more people spoke the truth, then we wouldn't have to deal all the PC sh*t that is now so prevalent.

Actually I call it "refreshing", so get a clue.

177 posted on 06/11/2006 11:09:21 AM PDT by GlennLivett (Insula est scelestus interficio monastica quod Mohammed est abbas of totus monachus quod volutabrum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: hope

Democrats are scared they might have to debate the actual premise of the book. So they latch onto one thing, take it out of context, and call for a ban on the book. If they had actually read the book, they would know that they are doing precisely what she says they always do.


178 posted on 06/11/2006 11:09:51 AM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
Again, like the Dixie Chicks..the wanted to enter the political fray with impunity. IT DOESN'T WORK THAT WAY. Grow up.

Who said they were immune from criticism? Coulter's statements go well beyond criticism.

179 posted on 06/11/2006 11:10:00 AM PDT by jude24 ("I will oppose the sword if it's not wielded well, because my enemies are men like me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: jude24

Well supreme judge of "taste", please enlighten us to the "tasteful" way of outing media whores!!!


180 posted on 06/11/2006 11:10:30 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist (I'd rather be carrying a shotgun with Dick, than riding shotgun with a Kennedyl!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 361-362 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson