Posted on 06/08/2006 9:37:51 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher
In almost every poll, the three front-runners for the Republican nomination in 2008 are Rudy Giuliani, Condi Rice and John McCain.
As Condi has ruled it out and Rudy is a Manhattanite on social and moral issues -- gays, guns, affirmative action and abortion -- McCain, as a conservative maverick and media darling, appeared to have the pole position for the nomination. That no charismatic challenger is visible has seemed to add to the aura of inevitability of John McCain.
But the last six weeks have muddled this picture, and McCain now appears out of step with his party and country. Consider the returns from California of Tuesday last.
Brian Bilbray, a lobbyist who had won 15 percent in the primary to 44 percent for Democratic opponent Francine Busby -- to fill the seat of convicted Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham -- came from behind to win 49-45. Busby's failure suggests the "culture-of-corruption" issue is no sure winner for Democrats this fall. Bad news for Rahm Emanuel, who runs the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
But worse news for McCain. For Bilbray attributes his comeback to a relentless assault on the McCain amnesty for illegal aliens that passed the Senate in May and his support for a 2,000-mile fence on the U.S. border from the Gulf of Mexico to the Pacific. So miffed at Bilbray was McCain he canceled a fund-raising appearance.
Not only is McCain the champion of the "indocumentados," he has imputed racist motives to senators who oppose putting illegals on a path to American citizenship. As Kathryn Jean Lopez of National Review Online writes, "McCain uttered on the Senate floor what was probably the worst sentence of the entire debate," when he flippantly asked, "What next -- are we going to say work-authorized immigrants are going to have to ride in the back of the bus?"
This language is redolent of the moral superiority liberals often assumed, which helped to make them insufferable to Middle America.
After comparing opponents of his amnesty bill to defenders of Jim Crow, McCain, says Lopez, at an off-the-record event in New York, allegedly called Rush Limbaugh a "nativist." He then joined the liberal Republicans in voting against a constitutional amendment that would define marriage as between a man and a woman.
Not needed, says McCain. But if some U.S. judge declares that the 14th Amendment outlaws state discrimination against gays when handing out marriage licenses, how would McCain overturn the ruling? To the Christian base of the party, protection of marriage is an imperative if we are to slow America's slide into decadence.
While voting no on the marriage amendment will cause McCain's media auxiliary to purr with pleasure at this backhanding of the religious right, how would it have hurt McCain to have voted with his party? He seems more concerned with remaining in the good graces of the Log Cabin club than with the evangelical Christians. To secularists, this is the moral place to stand -- but the GOP is not a secularized institution.
On Iraq, an increasingly unpopular war, McCain remains far more hawkish than Bush and is pushing the president to insult Russia's President Putin by boycotting the July G-8 meeting in St. Petersburg.
Yet one senses Americans are tiring of the endless bellicosity of the Bushites and neoconservatives, which has produced nothing but ill will against us. This was surely not the way of the tough but gracious and genial Ronald Reagan.
But it is the immigration issue that could sink McCain. For it is hard to believe today's GOP and Middle America, which wants the U.S. border sealed with a security fence and troops, will vote for a senator who favors amnesty, voted for welfare benefits for illegal aliens and sponsored with Teddy Kennedy a bill to bring scores of millions of new immigrants in over the next 20 years.
A McCain nomination would sunder the GOP between corporate conservatives and populist conservatives, and might generate a third party movement that could return the country -- to Bill and Hillary.
In Memphis, a month ago, when the Southern and Midwestern GOP parties gathered, a straw poll was held for which McCain was strangely unprepared. To avoid his impending embarrassment, McCain urged the attendees to cast their votes for President Bush. No one was fooled, especially not a political press corps that was out in force.
Since 2000, McCain has seemed the likely successor to George Bush, and to be moving adroitly to address his vulnerabilities as a candidate. Systematically, he repaired his relations with the Bush family, reached out to the Rev. Falwell and the religious right, became the most sought-after speaker at Republican rallies and fund-raisers, has been generous with his time and endorsements, and yet maintained his unique popularity with the media.
But of late, he appears to have re-adopted the persona and re-embraced the sort of ideas that make conservatives feel good about themselves when they vote against him. This thing is wide open.
One thing's for sure, McCain ain't it.
Never was and never will be.
I don't like Buchanan but I dislike McCain even more since the media wants to force McCain on all of us even though none of us vote for him.
Come on people, there MUST be a real conservative out there somewhere...
You never give up
Gee Pat, you're quick on the uptake.
If that's the case, prepare for PRESIDENT HILLARY...(God help us all!!!)
If the GOP is foolish enough to chose McCain as their candidate, then this is exactly what's going to happen. I personally REFUSE to vote for McCain. I'm not compromising my values to vote for the lesser of two evils again!!
Don't panic, a conservative WILL step up and take the nomination. McLame has zero chance to win, no conservative will vote for him. The same is mostly true of Rudy.
Made the MsNBC rounds today and praised the killing of Zar. but reminded all that only he had wanted more , more troops in Iraq and 'we all know who did not want that'. One more slam at W, and not only will he lose every primary, but will have to stop going on Larry King's and Matthews' shows.
Rice doesn't appear interested, and we really don't know much about her views. I don't find her actions at State to be encouraging, but her job there is to push the President's policy, not to make her own, so I'm not sure how much we can read into what she's doing there.
It's still early for the real candidate to be stepping forward and have to start spending a fortune trying to defend themselves against attacks by the liberal media.
We'll have 24 hour a day skewed coverage of every little thing they ever did more than soon enough.
Hey...I said I'd whole heartedly support Allen if he wins.
but ..tick...tick...tick...he'd better start getting some traction.
The GOP chose GWBush. McCain is your basic Bush clone. CFR, torture bill, immigration reform. If you loved Dubya, you'll love JohnnyMac! ;^)
We may have a problem there. The truly smart, the truly intelligent just do not go into politics anymore. Why put yourself and family through that crap.
As I have said many times before: Congress is the perfect example of the best and brightest of the United States of America NOT going into politics.
NO way on God's green earth can it be Frist. He's no leader, but possibly it would work for Newt or Tancredo.
Buchanan is worse. He's done more to help Liberals in his electoral efforts. He's an egotistical fraud.
Mitt Romney
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.