Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coonts: Secretary of Terror
Military.com ^ | June 7, 2006 | Stephen Coonts

Posted on 06/08/2006 6:41:02 PM PDT by oldtimer2

Coonts: Secretary of Terror Stephen Coonts | June 07, 2006

(The following short story by Stephen Coonts is a Military.com exclusive.)

The nominee to lead the new Department of Terror was a soft-spoken, balding professor in his fifties with no military experience, yet the pundits and congressional leaders quietly agreed that he was precisely the man for the job. The bill creating the new department had faced fierce opposition from an embittered minority in both houses, but their voices had been ignored by the large majority, who knew only too well the mood of their constituents. Today the Senate was holding a hearing on the fitness of the nominee, a classified hearing, of course, from which the press had been excluded.

The room was stifling hot, the air stagnant. Occasionally the lights flickered. Since the explosion last week at the Potomac Power Plant, emergency electrical power had been intermittent. Even when the power was on, the capitol's environmental system required more current than there was available, so it remained off.

“I understand you have a statement, Professor,” the chairman said.

“Yes, sir.”

“Go ahead, please.”

The professor began: “For the last ten years, since the atrocity on September 11, 2001, the civilized world has been under attack from Islamic fundamentalists. They have murdered tens of thousands of innocent people, disrupted the world's economy, and forced businesses and governments at every level to devote precious resources to physical security. In effect, the civilized world is paying a terrorism tax.

“The terrorists have no agenda, no points upon which governments can negotiate. Nor do they nominally control any governments upon which the allied nations can bring pressure, either political, economic, or military. The root of the problem is the attempt by Islamic clerics to preserve their own power in what they believe is a way of life dictated by the Koran. This way of life is anathema to the civilized west, which disagrees with every single tenet of fundamental Islam. Everywhere the west impinges upon Islamic society, change is inevitable. The clerics demand obedience from the faithful, have declared jihad , have promised paradise to those who die murdering the nonbelievers.

“The parallels to the Christian Crusades of the Middle Ages are obvious and have been commented upon ad nauseum, yet there is a truth buried in there that I believe must be commented upon: It took a thousand years for western civilization to wrest power from the clerics and turn it over to secular government, which is one of the preconditions for intellectual freedom, scientific research, and the freedom to innovate, all essentials of this western civilization that feeds, clothes and houses a huge percentage of the world's population. Even the most incurable optimist must agree that a similar transition in the Islamic world will take centuries. Gentlemen, we don't have centuries. The voters have done enough bleeding.”

The professor went on, listed some of the major atrocities of the last ten years, some of the more prominent clerics, and major government initiatives to combat the terrorists, then said, “I am ready for your questions, Mr. Chairman.”

The chairman cleared his throat, whispered to an aide, then said, “Professor, if the senate confirms your nomination, what policies will you advocate to solve the problem -- no, problem is the wrong word -- the plague of terrorism?”

The professor was ready for that one. “For ten years governments have tried to combat terrorism as a crime. They have failed to convict even a small fraction of the terrorists they catch. The crimes are international and are committed by people sworn to secrecy and ready to die for their cause. The perpetrators are aided by sympathizers who lie or refuse to testify, and they are tried by juries frightened for their lives. The criminal codes and rules of procedure have proven woefully inadequate to handle this crisis. In short, terrorism is not a crime, it is an act of war, and must be treated as such.

“Conventional military responses have also proven futile. Smashing third world governments because they tolerate or refuse to combat terrorists hasn't solved anything. In fact, it makes the clerics stronger because they no longer have to compete for power with secular authorities. The people are left to choose between the mosques or anarchy. Clearly, we must go in other directions.”

When the professor paused for a sip of water, the chairman asked, “What other directions?”

“By definition, terrorism is a surprise armed attack on unarmed people going about the business of life,” the professor said. “The people who do it to us have up to now rightly assumed that we will not do it to them. We have attempted to build legal cases against the perpetrators, have tried to find and arrest those we believe responsible and bring them to justice. When we have actually identified terrorists, we have launched military expeditions to kill or apprehend them. This is like trying to shoot fleas with a cannon. We need to turn the world upside down. We need to declare war on the terrorists. We need to attack them, attack those who fund and support them -- we need to attack the obsolete theocracy that spawns these agents of the devil.”

The professor paused to ensure he had the attention of every member of the committee, then said, “If confirmed by the senate, I will undertake to attack and destroy the terrorists with terror.” He warmed to his subject. “The only way to put a stop to terror is to defeat the clerics, to break their hold on the people. We will target the mosques. We will wait until they are full of people, then flatten them with cruise missiles. We will randomly attack hospitals and schools, markets, shops and factories, basically disrupt life until the people are reduced to abject poverty and starvation, without medical facilities or clean water or transportation or communication. The clerics will either be dead or powerless.”

The committee chairman yielded to the senior senator of the opposition party, a white-haired man named Franklin. “You are a hard man,” Senator Franklin observed.

“They have declared holy war on us,” the nominee shot back. “We must declare war on them, then wage it with a will, with all our might. Not with a bomb here, a bullet there, but with overwhelming force and all the resources we can muster. We will destroy Islam as it currently exists.”

“Have you ever seen a dead body, guts and brains smashed out?”

“No, senator, I haven't. When my son came home from Iraq, the coffin was sealed.” A moment of stark silence followed that remark.

“I have seen bodies, sir,” Senator Franklin remarked to the silent chamber. “I know what war is, and it isn't what you advocate. I too have lost friends to terrorism, and the sons and daughters of friends. Any yet, the course of action you recommend disgusts me. It is unworthy of a great nation. It is unworthy of the American people.”

“Senator, with all respect for the office you hold, I have heard nothing from you or your political friends that will put an end to terrorism. The American people have had enough! The time has come to fight fire with fire, which is the reason I am here today. I have sworn to the president that if I am confirmed, I will not shrink from my duties. I will smite the enemy hip and thigh.”

“I find these Biblical allusions grotesque, professor.”

“I apologize if I have offended you, sir.”

“And so you will reduce the Islamic world to rubble, leaving the surviving children to search through the rubble like rats for food… after that, what then?”

“If they want more holy war,” the nominee said slowly, emphasizing every word, “we must give it to them. We did not declare war on them -- they declared it on us.”

“Oh, no!” Senator Franklin roared. “Oh, no. A few fanatics carry out murderous criminal attacks, but the vast majority of the people in the Arab world have not raised a hand against us.”

“I beg to differ. They harbor the clerics who preach this poison. They pay for terrorism, they provide the jihad soldiers, they cheer the atrocities in the streets and in the mosques. They are not our friends, senator, nor are they neutral. They are our enemies and we will not win this war until we recognize and act on that fact.”

The senator was unconvinced. “The way to stop terrorism is to help the secular governments of the Arab world provide education, jobs and a decent living for their citizens.”

“You say that, sir,” the professor shot back, “as if the governments of these nations lived on a distant planet. The governments are the people; their policies reflect precisely what the people want.”

“Do you believe the American people want their government and armed forces to become terrorists?” the senator demanded.

“The American people do not want to be victims of terror, senator. They don't want their children murdered by wild-eyed religious fanatics trying to sneak into a perverted paradise. And they have a right to act to prevent that from happening. The president has asked me to lead the Department of Terror, and I agreed. I will act for and on behalf of the American people -- that I promise you. I will not be squeamish, I will not shirk from what has to be done, and I will sit before you from time to time and tell you precisely what we did and how we did it.”

“For that we are grateful,” Senator Franklin said sarcastically. “But what if, despite your best efforts at murder and mayhem, the Islamic holy warriors continue to attack us?”

“If terrorism fails, Senator, I will recommend to the president that the survivors be pushed into the deserts and isolated. Without food and water, they will quickly perish.”

“You are advocating genocide?”

“No, sir. I am advocating self-defense. If the believers in Islam cannot adapt to civilization, they have selected themselves out of the gene pool. We are merely going to hasten them on their way to whatever God has waiting.”

In the silence that followed that remark the chairman said, “I think we have asked enough questions,” and whacked his gavel.

He scanned the faces of the other senators. “I move that this committee recommend to the full senate that the professor be confirmed for the office of secretary of the Department of Terror.”

The motion was seconded.

“All in favor raise your hand,” the chairman said. “All opposed… The ayes have it.”

Copyright 2006 Stephen Coonts. All opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily reflect those of Military.com.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: departmentofterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
This short story by Stephen Coonts is set 4 years from now and is a very harsh solution for the war on terror.

I would like to hear from anyone who has an opinion, What do you think about this proposal?

There is also a forum on military.con that you might want to join.

1 posted on 06/08/2006 6:41:04 PM PDT by oldtimer2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: oldtimer2

I think it's stupid, but you asked for opinions.


2 posted on 06/08/2006 6:46:46 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldtimer2

With Coonts you really don't know which way he's taking the story with just this short of a snippet.


3 posted on 06/08/2006 6:47:04 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Coonts has never backed off from stern measures in any of his previous books. I hope this is an excerpt from an upcoming book.
4 posted on 06/08/2006 6:50:30 PM PDT by oldtimer2 (You don' defeat terrorism with temperance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: oldtimer2

bttt


5 posted on 06/08/2006 6:53:04 PM PDT by dennisw (We should return to calling them Muhammadans -- Worshippers of Muhammad and maybe Allah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldtimer2
It's a short story. I agree that Coonts has remained consistent with his main characters (Jake Grafton), however, he's also been consistent in that the upper levels of our government, individuals or institutions, can and will make grave mistakes.

With just this snippet you can't tell which was he intends to go with the story....we know nothing about the professor.

6 posted on 06/08/2006 6:55:09 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: oldtimer2

Two things will stop Islamic terror. Mass death, or mass conversion to Christianity. Not political freedom, unless of course, it's accompanied by spiritual freedom, which is the 'mass conversion to Christianity' part.

That is the reality.


7 posted on 06/08/2006 6:55:47 PM PDT by ovrtaxt (Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie!'... till you can find a rock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldtimer2

That's about what my people had to do to make the Islamics pay attention. They executed our ambassadors and traders without provocation. They didn't respond to negotiation, they didn't respond to threats.

So we responded in the only way they understood - by waging unrestricted war upon them and crushing their civilization. This is why they seem stuck in the 14th century; we decapitated their culture.

The only thing I regret is that we didn't finish the job.


8 posted on 06/08/2006 6:56:33 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
"I think it's stupid, but you asked for opinions."

Ah! In four years the Bird Flu Pandemic will have corrected this problem.

9 posted on 06/08/2006 7:06:11 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: oldtimer2

I say let's take the fiction and turn it too reality.The U.S. is the one government on this earth that can do it and we the civilised people of the western world will not allow a group of savages to take us back to the 7th century.

The U.S. government should put these countries on notice that if they fund terrorist or allow them to flourish they will be eradicated by use of the Neutron bombs.

Its the only way to save western civilization.


10 posted on 06/08/2006 7:06:48 PM PDT by puppypusher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: puppypusher

If the WOT is still going strong 4 years from now, we may see your wishes come true. At that point I don't think it would be unjustified.


11 posted on 06/08/2006 7:09:38 PM PDT by oldtimer2 (You don' t defeat terrorism with temperance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: oldtimer2

I think the GWOT has been largely a police action, fought with kid gloves. In most cases, we know where the terrorist are, but do nothing because of political and diplomatic considerations. Certainly, the trial of Mossoui was a joke and I fear Guantanomo will be closed before long (and its inmates repatriated). The Professor makes some good points. I don't think we can ever really win the war with our current approach. That being said, a lot more Americans would have to die before we embrace the Professor's approach.


12 posted on 06/08/2006 7:12:29 PM PDT by rbg81 (1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldtimer2
This short story by Stephen Coonts is set 4 years from now and is a very harsh solution for the war on terror.

Maybe after 4 years the general public will realize that we are not fighting a war on terror but are fighting a war against Islamic extremists who happen to use terror as a tactic. IMHO, there is more truth to this story than fiction......

13 posted on 06/08/2006 7:25:36 PM PDT by eeriegeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

In 1939 we would not have approved carpet bombing Germany or Japan either. $ years later we willing did it. I think it was the right thing to do.


14 posted on 06/08/2006 7:27:41 PM PDT by oldtimer2 (You don' t defeat terrorism with temperance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: oldtimer2

Sorru, I meant 4 years.


15 posted on 06/08/2006 7:28:22 PM PDT by oldtimer2 (You don' t defeat terrorism with temperance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: oldtimer2

The "KILLEMALL"s wet dream. If I'm a Muslim and the US pulls this sh!t on me, it wouldn't matter how pro-America I was, I'd instantly sign up with the Jihad express.

I'll ask a hypothetical question. Aliens from another world came to our conflict ridden earth and claim to offer, at no expense, a path to global peace and prosperity. Groups of humans, mistrustful of the aliens, formed an organization to attack these aliens. After various skirmishes and military expeditions against the rebels, the aliens perceived no visible success. To bring the rebellious humans to heel, they torched our infrastructure, destroyed our towns and homes, and wiped out millions. Now, the million dollar question, would you kowtow to the aliens and ask for forgiveness, or join up with the rebels and send the aliens back to whatever planet cam from? I don't care if they offer cookies and icecream. If they wiped out my homes and family, I'd sure as hell send these b@stards packing. So would anyone subjected to such Godless terrorism.

America is great because we care and always take the higher ground. Even after Dresden and the two a-bombs, we didn't just move in and mow down every German or Japanese men, women, and child. We don't have too. Despite the heated propaganda and rhetoric and threats to "wipe the Huns and Japs off the face of the earth" we never did that when we easily could have. In fact, Operation Downfall would have resulted in the near or total extinction of the Japanese ethnicity. The A-Bomb saved many times more lives; ours, friends, enemies, and innocents alike, than the proposed invasion of Japan. We came not only as guardians of the world, but as saviors of our enemies from an evil, dehumanizing, and dictatorial delusion.

Screeds advocating thermonuclear warfare or destroying Islam/Muslims disgust me. Behind the genocidal mentality infecting us there are very real lives, loves, families, and relationships. By adopting the same language and tactics as our enemy, we prove to be an inferior, hypocritical nation. Who cares if they see our kindness as weakness. We didn't lose a major general. Our country isn't falling apart like their pitiful rabble. We can ask the terror maggots again whether our kindness is weakness when they are staring down the barrel of a soldier's M4.

The fastest way to recruit more Bin Laden and Zarqawis is to prove every hate filled lies they ever make true. And we can do no better than adopting the tactics being advocated by this fictional professor and the hundred of armchair Hitlers indulging in their evil little fantasies with no regard to the principles this country was founded on, the proper conduct of a great nation in a (barely) civilized world, human decency, and more importantly the teachings and edicts of God himself.


16 posted on 06/08/2006 7:34:03 PM PDT by Killborn (Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Killborn

Well said.


17 posted on 06/08/2006 7:42:49 PM PDT by GoDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GoDuke

Thank you. We are winning and we are doing the right thing. Don't let ANYONE, friend or foe, tell us otherwise.


18 posted on 06/08/2006 7:47:47 PM PDT by Killborn (Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Killborn
We'll see what you say in the years to come if this country's economy and way of life come crashing down to the point where we may be the ones scrounging around like rats for food, fuel, shelter and what-not.

The Germans and Japanese people of the 1940 did live in the "civilized" world with modern ways of life and knew when they were defeated. Not everyone in those countries were the radicals of the ruling parties.

The Muslims on the other hand all use religion as their guiding principle and their reward will come when they die ... taking as many of us as possible.

This war will be one of absolute survival and it will be a decision between OUR extinction or THEIR extinction ... Period.
19 posted on 06/08/2006 7:59:30 PM PDT by MaDeuce (Do it to them, before they do it to you! (MaDuce = M2HB .50 BMG))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MaDuce

The only way in h3ll that can happen is if the reins of power go to the treasonous communists.

All else is secondary. Twenty 9/11s can not destroy this country like an immoral tyrannical socialist pig taking the reins as POTUS.


20 posted on 06/08/2006 8:03:05 PM PDT by Killborn (Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson