Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Today' Blacks Out Bilbray Bellwether in Favor of Rehash of Mideast Woes
Today Show/NewsBusters ^ | Mark Finkelstein

Posted on 06/07/2006 5:18:17 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest

by Mark Finkelstein

June 7, 2006

For weeks, the MSM has been billing as a bellwether the congressional by-election in California to replace convicted felon Randy 'Duke' Cunningham. As per the conventional wisdom, if the Democrats managed to take the seat in what is normally a GOP-stronghold, it would be seen as a harbinger of horrible things to come for the Republican congressional majority.

Well, the election was held yesterday, and - whoops! - the Republican, Brian Bilbray, won. So how did Today spin it? Why, silence was suddenly golden. At least as far as the crucial first half-hour, not a word of coverage. Insert your imagine-if-the-Dem-had-won comment here.

While ignoring good GOP news at home, why not drag out Haditha, Abu Ghraib and any other black eyes for America and the Bush administration abroad? The excuse was an Andrea Mitchell-narrated segment on 'Selling America in the Mideast.' Here's a synopsis of Andrea's gloom-'n-doomer:

Mitchell: "How does the Bush administration win friends in the Muslim and Arab world while fighting an unpopular war with Iraq? It only got tougher recently with news of a possible civilian massacre at Haditha. While the facts are yet clear, to Muslim and Arab audiences, Haditha is the latest black eye for U.S. policy. Powerful images transmitted around the world, including on this week's covers of both 'Time' and 'Newsweek' [surprise!]. Before Haditha there was Abu Ghraib and criticisms of treatment of prisoners at at Guantanamo Bay."

Next, a clip of Shibley Telhami of the University of Maryland: "Iraq has become a prison of pain for most people in the Arab and Muslim world when they look at America. It is impossible for public diplomacy to overcome that."

NBC then went out of its way to embarrass the Bush administration and Mideast goodwill ambassador Karen Hughes, playing a clip of Hughes on an Arab street, caught asking an aide "how do you say 'friends?'"

Next, another clip of a US academic, Daniel Byman of Georgetown University, opining "The United States has deep problems in the Muslim world and a slightly better marketing effort can improve our image but won't solve the problem."

It got worse. Turns out we're not being nice enough to Hamas. Mitchell:

"The problem isn't only unpopular American wars and prisoner abuse. Mideast critics say while the president preaches democracy, when the Palestinians voted for Hamas, the U.S. cut off funds from the democratically-elected new Hamas government."

The president only 'preaches' democracy? And here I thought he had sent hundreds of thousands of troops and spent hundreds of billions of dollars in an effort giving Afghanistan and Iraq a real shot at democracy.

A woman in a head scarf was shown stating: "Democracy is democracy on US terms rather than the voice of the people really being heard."

Mitchell piled on: "Also undercutting the American argument for democracy, the US has often supported governments in the Middle East that have been brutal in repressing their own people."

Matt Lauer then took his shots:

"Andrea, let me talk to you about Haditha and the alleged massacre there. Adam Putnam who's a Republican congress from Florida who came back from Iraq recently said: 'What we know is pretty ugly stuff. I fear that Haditha can have even greater negative consequences in perception than Abu Ghraib.' Isn't this a situation for the U.S. where the fact the story is being reported, the damage is done?"

Andrea was happy to agree: "That's largely true. Even though there will be an investigation, what we know already is pretty negative. What my colleague Jim Miklaszewski has reporting from the Pentagon is that it's pretty clear that something dreadful happened. John Murtha, a very involved military-supporting member of the Congress [he supports the troops!], said that this is really, really bad example and the investigation will only make it worse. The images have been projected worldwide and that's been absorbed in the Middle East."

In a seemingly endless litany of gloom, Lauer segued: "Let's talk about Guantanamo and the treatment of prisoners there. In recent weeks some officials of key allies have spoken out harshly about Guantanamo. The British attorney general Peter Goldsmith said 'the historic tradition of the U.S. as a beacon of freedom, liberty and justice deserves the removal of this symbol. A prominent Spanish judge said 'a model like Guantanamo is an insult to countries that respect laws.' So, at what point does the Bush administration look at the risk/reward quotient and say is the information from the prisoners worth the damage to our reputation?"

Mitchell identified only one bright spot: the US's recent offer of direct negotiations with Iran coupled with a package of incentives if Iran gives up its nuclear ambitions, that has to be seen around the world as a positive development. Diplomacy over threats of military action?

But Mitchell did see a potential cloud on the horizon: "There will be counter-reaction and criticism from conservatives who opposed any talks with Iran." Yes, it's only those nasty conservatives who stand between America and an outreach to Iran that Jimmy Carter could love.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: abughraib; andreamitchell; bilbray; cunningham; guantanamo; haditha; iran; iraq; lauer; mediabias; nbc; todayshow
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: Huck

She didn't qualify. Not the same as losing.


41 posted on 06/07/2006 7:04:15 AM PDT by synbad600
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Well .. I'm just sick and tired of hearing "convicted felon Randy "Duke" Cunningham", or a couple of other sleazy words they put in front of Cunningham's name.

However, I've noticed that the "bribe man" William Jefferson (D-LA), has not been labeled with anything so crass.

Why is that ..??

Answer: THE MEDIA LOVES SMEARING REPUBS AND SHIELDING DEMS.

But .. there's no bias in the media .. right ..??


42 posted on 06/07/2006 7:40:13 AM PDT by CyberAnt (US Military: Raining fire from above for the freedom that we love!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sportutegrl

Yeah, the meathead's pet project did go down in flames, didnit it? Not a good day for liberals. I wonder how they'll spin it.


43 posted on 06/07/2006 7:43:32 AM PDT by Dionysius (ACLU is the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: synbad600

Yeah, I guess you're right. Not qualifying isn't even losing. It's worse than losing.


44 posted on 06/07/2006 7:45:13 AM PDT by Huck (Hey look, I'm still here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Wow! You have outdone yourself once again, GLGB.

Great synopsis and report today on TODAY.

The blantant bias of the MSM is stripped bare for even the most blind skeptic to see.

45 posted on 06/07/2006 7:58:29 AM PDT by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Bilbray is nowhere in the news. Just like DeLay's primary victory was blacked out.

Dems are panicking, for sure...

46 posted on 06/07/2006 8:04:56 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Conservatism is moderate, it is the center, it is the middle of the road)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCPatriot

Many thanks, DCP. I can't take much credit - this was shooting fish in a MSM barrel ;-)


47 posted on 06/07/2006 8:40:19 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show Since 2002 So You Don't Have To.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: demkicker

Wow... great cartoon!


48 posted on 06/07/2006 9:31:01 AM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Excellent article! And thanks for the ping. I was wondering how the morning MSM would handle the happy defeat of the 'RAT Busby. By ignoring it, of course.


49 posted on 06/07/2006 9:32:54 AM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

50 posted on 06/07/2006 9:33:36 AM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Rush just discussed this Drive By Omission.


51 posted on 06/07/2006 9:36:18 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (There's a dwindling market for Marxist homosexual lunatic wet dreams posing as journalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
"Mitchell: "How does the Bush administration win friends in the Muslim and Arab world while fighting an unpopular war with Iraq?"

The proper reply: "Well, Andrea, you've probably heard it said many times that one reason the Arabs don't like us is that we support their repressive governments. So Bush decided to change that policy, and we removed one of the most repressive, brutal regimes in the world. And now the Arabs are criticizing us for THAT! So, it's kind of like we're damned if we do, and damned if we don't, isn't it? Andrea? Andrea? Oh, so you agree that the old argument that they didn't like us because we supported oppressive regimes was just a fake, BS talking point? Andrea?"
52 posted on 06/07/2006 12:30:06 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson