Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LibLieSlayer
You could tell that she was threatened by Ann, due to the fact that Ann is smarter, prettier, more Conservative, and the fact that Ann was attacking the anti-American, POS, 9/11 Commission's "Useful Idiots" for their subversion in the name of their dead family members. Edie has far too much empathy for those types, and it shown on FnF's this morning... bigtime.

Well, there's no accounting for taste. I happen to think ED Hill is much more attractive than "Bones" Coulter.

Certainly the Jersey Girls are overstaying their 15 minutes, but to call them "witches" or "harpies," and asking if their husbands weren't planning to divorce them is really over the top. At least they were married, with children, unlike Coulter, who can't seem to snag a man on a bet.

The Coulterites love this red meat, but this goes in her pantheon of describing Harriett Miers as a "cleaning lady," and her entreaty to force Muslims to convert to Christianity.

Coulter makes her living being low class and mean. We ought to be able to do better than looking to this banshee for any kind of conservative wisdom.

BTW, your post, with the "POS" epithet, fits right in with Coulter's toilet-bowl approach to other human beings.

53 posted on 06/07/2006 5:34:22 AM PDT by sinkspur ( Don Cheech. Vito Corleone would like to meet you......Vito Corleone.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: sinkspur

I remember the bile spewing from the mouths of those low life opportunist women and you couldn't be more wrong, IMO.


58 posted on 06/07/2006 5:36:37 AM PDT by Pox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur

I would not have used the same language Coulter uses (which is a little strident and needlessly inflammatory, IMO) but I agree with her sentiments 100%.

These women have been propping up the corpses of their husbands to further their cynical political aims and no one has dared to point out their disgusting charade because of their victim status.

Using one's dead spouse as a prop to spew partison political rhetoric, and then hiding behind the corpse to disallow any criticism is far more disgusting than anything Coulter wrote in her book.


63 posted on 06/07/2006 5:39:28 AM PDT by Skooz (Chastity prays for me, piety sings...Modesty hides my thighs in her wings...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
At least they were married, with children, unlike Coulter, who can't seem to snag a man on a bet.

If Ann is not married, I can't know for sure but I'm guessing it's by choice. She's looks good for her age, is attractive, is famous and makes good money. With those factors I'm sure she can have her pick.

86 posted on 06/07/2006 6:01:15 AM PDT by gop_gene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
...The Coulterites love this red meat, but this goes in her pantheon of describing Harriett Miers as a "cleaning lady," and her entreaty to force Muslims to convert to Christianity...
If you keep posting the DU talking points, I will keep correcting you. :o)
Ann said NOTHING about using force.
As I posted on the "Ann's birthday" thread, see Ann's own words from her interview with Katie "the affable Eva Braun" Couric:
Katie Couric: You were also fired, I guess, because you wrote in the National Review that we should -- when it came to fighting terrorism, we should invade their countries, kill their leaders, and convert them to Christianity. Do you still believe that that's the best way to combat terrorism worldwide?

Ann Coulter: Well, that's a somewhat dishonest quote. I was referring to the people in the previous sentence of that column, cheering and dancing in the streets right now, and, in fact, this -- the way that was so widely misquoted is an example of what I described in my book, which is the constant mischaracterizations, which is a small word, picking out the word of parents. It makes a big difference. And these subtle differences that are then glossed over as if there's absolutely no difference. To try to portray conservatives as crazy people, as Nazis, slave owners, (unintelligible), homophobic, how about dealing with our ideas? I mean I've written two books now, I've written hundreds of columns, I've been on TV hundreds of times. The idea that someone can go out and find one quote that will suddenly, you know, portray me just dismiss her ideas, read no more, read no further, this person is crazy --

Katie Couric: Well, obviously --

Ann Coulter: -- is precisely what liberals do all the time.

Katie Couric: But obviously the National Review had a problem with these articles and some of the pieces you did because you were fired from that job. Can you elaborate or at least tell us what you exactly meant?

Ann Coulter: That also isn't quite true. I mean I write a syndicated column, I write for Human Events. That's the newspaper that hires me. People buy a syndicated column, and they dropped the column. But a lot of people don't like me for a lot of different reasons, including --

Katie Couric: Why don't you explain what you meant, then.

Ann Coulter
: -- that they're my competitors.

Katie Couric: What do you think is the best way to battle terrorism?

Ann Coulter: Point one and point two by the end of the week had become official government policy.

As for converting them to Christianity, I think it might be a good idea to get them on some sort of hobby other than slaughtering infidels. I mean perhaps that's the Peace Corps, perhaps it's working for Planned Parenthood, but I've never seen the transforming effect of anything like that Christianity...

CLICK HERE for the full text of Ann's EXTRAORDINARY article ("This is War" -- posted on 9/12/01) from which that quote was taken.

93 posted on 06/07/2006 6:05:09 AM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
You do love to be a contrarian, do you not?!

I think I'll surprise you and just say we disagree on several points.

LLS
121 posted on 06/07/2006 6:20:29 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
Coulter makes her living being low class and mean

Funny, I hear Democrats describe Bush with the exact same phrase. Go figure.

125 posted on 06/07/2006 6:22:46 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
Coulter makes her living being low class and mean. We ought to be able to do better than looking to this banshee for any kind of conservative wisdom.

I agree. I saw her interview, and she was shrill and detestable.

133 posted on 06/07/2006 6:24:56 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur; All
These women have not shut up, still use their victim status as a claim to authority, are partisan, are just as brutal as Ann and far more unfair, and yes they do seem to be enjoying themselves.

Kristen Breitweiser writing on April 5, 2006 about why Rudy Giuliani should not be allowed to make a victim's impact statement at the Moussaoui penalty phase hearing.

Monica Gabrielle, Hillary's guest

163 posted on 06/07/2006 6:41:11 AM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur

"Coulter makes her living being low class and mean. We ought to be able to do better than looking to this banshee for any kind of conservative wisdom."

Agreed on your points- 100%. Oh, but I forgot, shes "hot" (ROFLMAO). Flame away.


221 posted on 06/07/2006 7:14:05 AM PDT by LongsforReagan (Whackydoodles believe men and dinosaurs walked together. The world laughs at them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
I'm not a vapid Coulter fan, though I agree with her more than half the time. Some of her language might have been over the top, but "witches of New Brunswick" was a reference to The Witches of Eastwick

, about three widows who get mixed up with the devil, was exactly on target.

I remember some of the charges those shills made when they were campaigning for Hanoi John.

They have it coming, and far better coming from a woman. As you can see, we're called "catty" for a reason.

246 posted on 06/07/2006 7:42:01 AM PDT by cake_crumb (Drugs? Illegals? Legalize and Tax 'Em All, Right? Right??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
Ann for President! More people agree with her than don't.

She fights fire with fire and then some. You seem to have acquired liberal PC sensitivities lately, except of course for the annual priest bashing.

257 posted on 06/07/2006 7:51:34 AM PDT by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur

Stinkpur, you're as predictable as MurryMom.


293 posted on 06/07/2006 8:43:53 AM PDT by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur; sittnick; ninenot; Convert from ECUSA; Tax-chick
Sinkspur: If Annie were a supporter of legalized faggotry or various other perversions, instead of being a magnificent provocateur on behalf of normality, a supporter of the United States, conservatism, the war, and having the brass that our politicians lack to tell the unvarnished truth, I bet she would get more of a Kumbaya from certain circles, even some which agree with her on war.

Oh, and if you and I and most other FReepers could manage to marry, I bet Ann will have no difficulty if and when she decides that the time has come. If she prefers to remain single, despite the loss to the male half of the human race, that is AT LEAST as much her business as any decision by Lance and Bruce to massacre nature and morality.

AND, she is right about the Witches of East Brunswick. Their fifteen minutes is up. Maybe if you had lived in the northeast, you would be more familiar with this particular windtunnel social phenomenon (the Kristen Notsobreitweisers trolling for the unnatural extension of their fifteen minutes of notoriety because they imagine that 9/11 is all about them and constitutes a permanent credential). It is long past time for Kristen and her comrades to sit down and shut up. No one, but no one, cares about the lust for publicity of these aging left-wing drama queens of the New Jersey hunt country shamelessly exploiting their dead husbands to propagandize their irrelevant public policy perversions and prescriptions. They say they have suffered. Maybe! We have certainly suffered them.

Time for them to, ummmm, MOVE ON.

Sincerely,

Annie's low class and mean (and darn proud of it!) fan

Black Elk

Coulterite (since knowing her older brother John 35 years ago).

P.S. If she ever makes the full commitment to be a Catholic, I would love to see her go after John Allen and the National antiCatholic Reporter.

341 posted on 06/07/2006 10:14:41 AM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
So Coulter called out all those 'Jersey" widows who danced on their husbands grave. Boo freaking hoo.

The media took the bait and Coulter's publisher/distributors are probably in a fantastic mood.

I think Coulter's goal was reached. Use her bombastic style to, push the debate, sell books, piss off moderate Repubs and make a lot of $$$$.... I do think her only goal in life is to make a lot of $$$ judging by the men she dates but I am glad she called the Jersey girls out (With tremendous help from the media).
401 posted on 06/07/2006 11:58:35 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson