Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush is the Next Reagan
Persian Journal ^ | Jun 4, 2006 | Slater Bakhtavar

Posted on 06/04/2006 2:24:14 PM PDT by nuconvert

Bush is the Next Reagan

Jun 4, 2006

Slater Bakhtavar - Persian Journal

The same people who heavily criticized former President Reagan for his tough stance against Communism and for his aggressive push for democracy in Eastern Europe are now attacking President Bush for his tough stance against fundamentalism and his aggressive push for democracy in the Middle East.

-They argued then that Communism would never fall - it did They argue now that Islamic Fundamentalism will never fall - it will

-They argued then that the Soviet Union is too strong - it wasn't

They argue now that the insurgency is too strong - it isn't

-They argued that Reagans vision of democracy in East Europe would never work - it did

They argue now that Bushs vision of democracy for the mid-east would never work - it will

They argued then that Reagans evil empire speech was a failure - it wasn't

They argue now that Bushs axis of evil speech is a failure - it won't be

-They argued then that former soviet bloc countries wouldn't embrace democracy - they did

They argue now that middle east countries would never embrace democracy - they will

-They argued then that Eastern Europeans nations would never be our allies - they are

They argue now that middle eastern countries will never be our allies - they will be

-They argued then that people without God could never embrace democracy - they did

They argue now that Muslims will never embrace democracy - they will

-They argued then that President Reagan was unrealistic - he wasn't

They argue now that President Bush is unrealistic - he'll prove he isn't

-They argued then democracy isn't universal to former Communists - it was

They argue now democracy isn't universal to Middle Easterners - it will be

-They argued then that funding of pro-democracy groups in Eastern European countries won't work - it did

They argue now that funding of pro-democracy groups won't work in the Middle East - it will

The same exact critcism was directed at Reagan. The future will be the judge of President Bush and my guess is that he will be judged as the Great Liberator of the Middle East.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; bushdoctrineunfolds; deify; democracy; liberators; middleeast; reagan; spendalot; strongleader; weakposters; worstprezever
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 701-716 next last
To: blasater1960

The most thoughtful (and objective) comment posted do date.


101 posted on 06/04/2006 4:54:44 PM PDT by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Yeah, right.


102 posted on 06/04/2006 4:55:02 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (I'll believe in the efficacy of a "virtual fence" when they put one around the White House...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: akron

A LOT of people are criticizing the first President Bush for "cutting his losses" and not going all the way to Baghdad...and DO say, that perhaps if we had, 9/11 might not have happened.

Also, since Reagan DID pull out, we will never know, will we??

See, you can build Reagan up as this superhuman POTUS, because he didn't have a 9/11 to contend with..and you can hypothesize all day long, and say 'what ifs'...

That is a lib trick and I won't play that game.


103 posted on 06/04/2006 4:57:41 PM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
Do you think that if Reagan HAD done something, rather than leave Lebanon...that possibly al-queda might have not become what they are?? After all, it has been said that Bin Ladin HAS seen the times that America has "left" rather than stay and fight, as a weakness...and gave him more reason to believe he would take down the mighty USA...

bin Laden was a nobody in the early 1980's. He got his panties in a bunch when GHWB stationed troops in Saudi Arabia prior to kicking Saddam out of Kuwait. Blaming Reagan even in part for OBL's theory that we won't fight is quite a reach.

It is ironic though that Reagan, who did not do very well in the Middle East, is compared favorably to GWB who at least, as did his father, fight Saddam and other radicals.

104 posted on 06/04/2006 4:57:46 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats (I Love Free Republic!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
I read it again. I didn't 'get it' because it wasn't relevant.

I'm sorry that you have become so bitter, EV. I remember when you were a nice guy.

105 posted on 06/04/2006 4:58:30 PM PDT by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraq War VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

One little "voice of reason"...as Rush would say...gets it among all of the hate mongers.


106 posted on 06/04/2006 5:00:45 PM PDT by TatieBug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
You're right about one thing. Reagan TALKED a better game.

When all is said and done, Bush will have played a better game...........and that's where it counts.

107 posted on 06/04/2006 5:01:17 PM PDT by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraq War VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

Oh, no???

Haven't you heard the "culture of corruption" echoing from coast to coast...and the screams for hearings on almost every intelligence program we have??

Well...you will, the closer to the election we get..and trust me, if the dems win in NOV...Bush won't have ONE MINUTE of the next 2 years, where he ISN'T preparing for an impeachment hearing..or getting paperwork ready for others in his administration have hearings...

Also...Have you heard of Scooter Libby??


108 posted on 06/04/2006 5:02:52 PM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
Those of you who believe Osamma and Al Qaeda would not exist if Reagan went on the offensive in Lebanon or Bush I would have pushed on in Baghdad, are woefully uninformed about Islam in general and radical Islam in particular.

The goal of Islam since the day of Muhammad has been world domination. Islamic extremism starter in the middle of the 19th century and has been picking up steam ever since. The problems related to radical Islam would be different, but we'd still be having them.
109 posted on 06/04/2006 5:04:25 PM PDT by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: All

The left's attacks against Bush are straight out of the same playbook they used against Reagan. Parallels can defiantly be drawn between the cold war and the war on terror, with liberals being on the wrong side of both wars.

On the other hand, Bush does not have the charisma that Reagan had.


110 posted on 06/04/2006 5:06:18 PM PDT by CaliGangsta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
I read it again. I didn't 'get it' because it wasn't relevant.

You don't get the relevancy of how foolish it is to judge men by the standard set by other men instead of the standards set by the Lord? You don't understand that the particular verse I mentioned is addressing that very foolishness? Well, okay, then.

I'm sorry that you have become so bitter, EV. I remember when you were a nice guy.

I'm still a nice guy, friend.

But when it comes to the policies that will affect the future of liberty in this country for my kids and grandkids, I don't happen to believe that feel-good syncophancy is the way to go.

111 posted on 06/04/2006 5:06:47 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (I'll believe in the efficacy of a "virtual fence" when they put one around the White House...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: GianniV

gag me


112 posted on 06/04/2006 5:07:00 PM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
I guess you backed Obama, then.

Well, I did. :)

113 posted on 06/04/2006 5:07:46 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Coolidge is under appreciated. His stock is slowly going up.


114 posted on 06/04/2006 5:09:04 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats

It isn't "my theory", even though I agree with it...

I have read quite a few articles about how Bin Ladin used even our history in VIETNAM, to realize his dream of taking down the USA...

So don't tell me that just because he hadn't attacked the USA back in the early eighties, that he wasn't planning..

Also, the first WTC bombing was in EARLY 90's..right?


115 posted on 06/04/2006 5:10:35 PM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
When all is said and done, Bush will have played a better game...........and that's where it counts.

If he hadn't supported RINOs over conservatives at every turn, deepened government control over the schools, gutted the First Amendment with CFR, refused to enforce the laws against hiring illegal aliens, refused to close the border, spent taxpayer's money like a drunken sailor on steroids, exercised a veto once in awhile, treated with the terrorist Abu Mazen, forced Israelis to give up land to Palestinian terrorists, or even exercised his executive power to save Terri Schiavo from an out-of-control local judge, maybe I would agree with you.

116 posted on 06/04/2006 5:12:40 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (I'll believe in the efficacy of a "virtual fence" when they put one around the White House...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

I all ready think that President Bush has a great vision and is one of the top 3 Presidents this country has ever or will ever have!!!


117 posted on 06/04/2006 5:13:39 PM PDT by Jewels1091
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Then why us he hovering around 29%. Reagan NEVER HAD THSOE LOW NUMBERS.


118 posted on 06/04/2006 5:14:09 PM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Well, I did. :)

*shaking my head*

That's like handing Hillary a second vote to add to her own.

119 posted on 06/04/2006 5:14:11 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (I'll believe in the efficacy of a "virtual fence" when they put one around the White House...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Blah, blah, blah.....

You're still doing the old revisionist dance.

120 posted on 06/04/2006 5:14:28 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 701-716 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson