Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush struggles for support to the inmigrant law
El Financiero en lĂ­nea ^ | June 1, 2006

Posted on 06/03/2006 7:37:23 AM PDT by KeyLargo

Bush struggles for support to the inmigrant law

Juees 1 de junio (12:30 hrs.)

* The US president speaks to the nation's biggest business group about the inmigration's benefits * The Chamber of Commerce and the National Restaurat Association support the guest worker program

El Financiero en línea

US, June 1st.- President George W. Bush, struggling to win broader support for his immigration proposals from his fellow Republicans, told the nation's biggest business group that new immigration laws would be a boon for the economy.

"In order for this country to be an economic leader, Bush said today in remarks to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in Washington, the country needs an immigration system that "is secure, orderly and fair".

Bush used his appearance before the Chamber, as he did with an address to the National Restaurant Association in Chicago on May 22, to try to keep up momentum for his immigration goals.

Both groups support the White House proposal for a guest worker program, which would maintain a legal flow of low-cost labor.

The tougher sell is to House Republicans, who stress getting tough on border security, immigration enforcement and bigger penalties for businesses that hire undocumented workers. The Senate has approved legislation that would strengthen border restrictions while also providing a guest worker program and giving some of the 11 million undocumented immigrants already living in the U.S. a path toward legal status and citizenship.

Bush is trying to bridge a divide between the two factions among Republicans as House and Senate negotiators try to resolve their differences to enact a new immigration law this year.

Democrats generally have supported the Senate version. Bush urged lawmakers to resolve their differences. "The difficulty of the task is no excuse for avoiding it", Bush said.

He backs a compromise plan crafted by senators, which, among other steps, would tighten borders, add 6,000 National Guard troops to augment Border Patrol agents, add new barriers and border sensors to reduce illegal immigration and provide an identification system for immigrant workers. It also would create a guest worker program.

"We re going to enforce our laws, that's what the people expect", Bush said, but the U.S. must also welcome immigrants that have contributed to the nation, and "these aren't contradictory goals.

The president said he doesn't want to pass the burden of verifying documents to businesses. The administration wants to adopt a biometric, tamper-proof identification card that employers can check against a federal data base to determine whether a worker is legal. The president also wants to raise fines for businesses who hire workers illegally. Penalties are now as low as $250.

"There's going to be a cost", he said, "and it's more than $250.

Representative Roy Blunt, the No. 2 Republican leader in the House, said last week that the odds of passing compromise legislation were not quite at 50-50. Representative James Sensenbrenner, a Wisconsin Republican, has called the Senate and House approaches "180 degrees apart.

The president will continue working with lawmakers to reach common ground, White House spokesman Tony Snow said. (Information provided by Finsat)


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; Mexico; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; aliens; amnesty; border; borders; bushbash; cira; guestworker; illegal; illegalaliens; illegalimmigration; illegals; immigrantlist; inmigration; laraza; mexico; reconquista; weneedanewpresident
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: gathersnomoss

All you do is have a potential employee fill out an employment application. Once they fill it out, I hand them an authorization to do a personal background check. If they refuse, you know that they are criminals, or illegal.


41 posted on 06/03/2006 8:54:13 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (If you got Sowell, you got Soul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SMM48
The House better not cave on this issue or they are toast!

Gotta agree with spokeshave here, the nation and we are the toast!

If this bill goes thru, then Bush should be impeached along with 2/3 of the Senate, and anyone in the House that voted for it!

We can only hope that Bush loses all support (statistically) for it.

42 posted on 06/03/2006 8:57:00 AM PDT by Fruitbat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bordergal

Face reality. Noone has a chance against Feinstein.....remember we live in California! lol


43 posted on 06/03/2006 8:57:00 AM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: sheana
.."We're going to enforce our laws, that's what the people expect"

He really has to stop talking like this. He's become a joke. We expect more from our President than empty words, repeated over and over like a mantra. So sad...

44 posted on 06/03/2006 8:57:19 AM PDT by doubtfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: doubtfire

Worse than that, I can't even stand to watch him on TV anymore. I turn my head and walk off. I have no interest in anything he has to say.
I am sure I am not alone.


45 posted on 06/03/2006 8:59:11 AM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
"All you do is have a potential employee fill out an employment application. Once they fill it out, I hand them an authorization to do a personal background check. If they refuse, you know that they are criminals, or illegal."

Simple enough isn't it..

In fact we don't even need new legislation for immigrants just the balls to enforce the current laws.

Maybe instead of bricks we should start mailing a pair of "Brass Ones" to those on the hill.

46 posted on 06/03/2006 8:59:57 AM PDT by Kakaze (American: a Citizen of the United States of America........not just some resident of said continent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: sheana

Yeah, sad to say, but California's a lost cause. Shame how far it's devolved since the heyday of the '50s, '60s and '70s there. When I think of California nostalgically I think of the Beach Boys, old movies, and other nice fun stuff. Today I think of it as a political itsh hole and a state not long for continued greatness.

It's past a reasonable balance politically all but ensuring that it and its enormous number of electoral vote, go Dim automatically henceforth. The nation's not far behind at the present rate however with RINO's behaving like libs on the most pressing issue(s).


47 posted on 06/03/2006 9:00:11 AM PDT by Fruitbat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: sheana
Face reality. Noone has a chance against Feinstein.

And Mountjoy can expect zero help from the national party or the Republican establishment and our president will continue to do his part to destroy the California Republican Party as he has since 2000.

48 posted on 06/03/2006 9:02:17 AM PDT by InABunkerUnderSF (Enforce the 13th Amendment - Free the H-1Bs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: tuvals
Add On to post # 38 Hmmm, amnesty? - Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
49 posted on 06/03/2006 9:02:52 AM PDT by tuvals (America First - Support Our Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: InABunkerUnderSF

Love your Nick rofl


50 posted on 06/03/2006 9:07:22 AM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
"The tougher sell is to House Republicans, who stress getting tough on border security, immigration enforcement and bigger penalties for businesses that hire undocumented workers."
MESSAGE TO REPUBLICANS: The "sell" is not merely to "House Republicans". The "sell" is to the American People! And anything less than
getting tough on border security,
immigration enforcement and
bigger penalties for businesses that hire undocumented workers
is a NO-"sell"--i.e. a deal breaker.

The American People want to re-elect the Republican Congress.

They are well aware of the benevolence and expert leadership of President Bush--that he has kept America safe since 9/11--and they are grateful.

However, their concern about open borders and illegal immigration carries over to their concern about national security--and other vital issues--and this overrides all other issues.

Fix this problem to the satisfaction of Middle America, and all will be well.

The basic loyalties of Middle America are definitely with President Bush and the Republican Congress.

51 posted on 06/03/2006 9:09:08 AM PDT by Savage Beast (The Spirit of Flight 93 is the Spirit of America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheana

With a MECHA-La Raza L.A. Mayor..........Good Lord!!


52 posted on 06/03/2006 9:11:17 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (If you got Sowell, you got Soul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

I don't live in L.A. thank God!


53 posted on 06/03/2006 9:17:37 AM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

"The difficulty of the task is no excuse for avoiding it",

"The irony of this statement by Bush is beyond words."


As is the fact that he makes the statements while keeping a straight face or feigning outrage.


54 posted on 06/03/2006 9:20:25 AM PDT by Kimberly GG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

That "adding 6000 National Guard troops to the border" is just such a big fat lie that it sticks in my craw. Sending about 200 Guardsmen at a time to the border states during their two-week duty rotations during a 12-18 month period to do nothing but answer the phone and shuffle papers with no enforcement duties is as bad as any lie Bill Clinton told the American people.


55 posted on 06/03/2006 9:26:47 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

"We re going to enforce our laws, that's what the people expect", Bush said, BUT the U.S. MUST also welcome immigrants that have contributed to the nation, and "these aren't contradictory goals.

IMO, Blackmail.


56 posted on 06/03/2006 9:27:17 AM PDT by Kimberly GG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker

"That video was disgusting. Has anyone on here ever been more dissapointed with a Republican president on a single issue?"


I have thought and thought about this, about how "disappointed" I personally am in President Bush. I have come to the conclusion that more of us would have been disappointed so much sooner, if it had not been for September 11, 2001. Bush responded so forcefully, surely and correctly. He rose to the occasion and was, well, magnificent. I felt he was personally defending ME, and my children.

There were things I wasn't totally satisfied with, yes. But I never expect to agree with anyone, especially a politcian, all the time. I told myself that he had his head on straight about our security, the safty of the nation, and that trumped everything else.

But when I began to look more closely at what was being done, here at home, to keep us safe, I began to wonder. I just did not sense the same urgency. Why, I asked myself, doesn't he publically express concern about the possible terrorists sneaking in on us, from the north and the south? At first, I told myself, he must be doing SOMETHING, behind the scenes, quietly, to keep from tipping our hand to our enemies. Time has proven me to be among the deluded ones.

So, why, I again ask myself, is not this danger seen as a danger by the man I helped to elect? What is his agenda? I guess he has had the same one all along,... but 9-11 blinded me....and gave him cover. I think I would have caught on much sooner. Well, I HAVE caught on now, .....I only hope it's not too late, for America.

pattyjo


57 posted on 06/03/2006 9:27:20 AM PDT by pj_627
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: InABunkerUnderSF
to do his part to destroy the California Republican Party as he has since 2000.

The what? I don't what California you live in but the one I am in has a bunch of guys who are so in bed with Democrats that you need a crowbar to pry them apart.

I think the call themselves Republicans but I can't be sure.

58 posted on 06/03/2006 9:28:06 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (FRee Charles Hendrickson!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: rcocean

"Welcome to Gerry Ford Part II"

But I hope we don't let Gerry Ford Part II lead to Jimmah Cahtah Part II.

Just four years of a commiecrat in the White House would spell catastrophe.

Let's just skip right to Ronaldus Magnus Part II.


59 posted on 06/03/2006 9:30:56 AM PDT by HalleysFifth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
What crap! I can check any of my employees back to the fetus in 30 minutes!! Are you using a proprietary service? It takes me 45 minutes!!!
60 posted on 06/03/2006 9:34:13 AM PDT by politicalwit (Freedom doesn't mean a Free Pass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson