Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Officers Likely to Be Charged in Haditha Killings, Sources Say
ABC News ^ | 6/1/06 | Jonathan Karl

Posted on 06/01/2006 8:15:24 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

June 1, 2006 — Military sources told ABC News that there are likely to be charges filed against officers up the chain of command in connection with the killing of 24 civilians by U.S. Marines in Haditha, Iraq, in November 2005.

Those who could be charged include senior officers who were not on the scene at the time of the killing but should have known something wrong had happened and done something about it.

Today the White House confirmed that it was nearly three months after the Haditha killings that an investigation began, only after Time Magazine showed a video to a military spokesman.

Until then, the military insisted the civilians in Haditha had been killed by a roadside bomb.

But the video showed a bloody scene that suggested otherwise and prompted officials to launch a preliminary investigation into what happened.

The investigation quickly uncovered evidence the civilians were killed by the Marines, not a roadside bomb. From that point interest in the case quickly reached the highest levels.

"This is just a reminder for troops either in Iraq or throughout our military that there are high standards expected of them and there are strong rules of engagement," Bush said. "The Haditha incident is under investigation. Obviously, the allegations are very troubling for me and equally troubling for our military."

Bush was first told about what happened on March 11, one week before Time Magazine first reported the story. Since then, the president has received regular updates on the investigation from the secretary of defense and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Sources familiar with the investigations told ABC News that the initial report claiming the civilians were killed by a bomb was filed by Sgt. Frank Wuterich. Wuterich was the top ranking Marine on the team that went into the houses where the civilians were killed. The question now, though, is where were his superiors?


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: charged; haditha; killings; likely; officers; sourcessay
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 last
To: txrangerette
He cannot speak in terms of the investigation, he can only speak in terms of media reports. Anyone would be troubled if they go by the media reports. DUH. Because he cannot exert command influence under the rules of the Military or it would compromise its legal system.

Oh C'mon. The President could have come out and said something to the effect of:

"Rather than comment on an ongoing investigation, I remind everyone in the media, the Congress, the public that in our system we are innocent until proven guilty."

Instead he gave that weak response about making people pay if they broke the law. Reminding us of our laws, values and commen sense is not only correct and needed, it would in no way compromise the Military legal system. Get a grip.

General Pace and Secretary Rumsfeld are following the same path. To be equal, go ahead and attack them, too, hotshot.

If I had heard them say something as feeble as that, then yes, I would have gone after them too.

Why you would think that reminding the everyone that these men are innocent until proven guilty, to remind us not to pass judgement until the investigation is over would be a wrong approach is beyond me.

81 posted on 06/02/2006 7:54:36 AM PDT by technomage (NEVER underestimate the depths to which liberals will stoop for power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Shelayne
He cannot say anything strongly in their defense because anything he says could jeapordize the case as "undue influence".

Well then, "undue influence" works both ways. the President should have been neutral, he was not. If undue influence is truly what you are concerned about, then reminding us that these men are innocent until proven guilty, that we should not jump to conclusions, would have made a hell of a lot more sense. Instead he appeared to allow media reports to sway.

I guess we must disagree.

82 posted on 06/02/2006 8:00:10 AM PDT by technomage (NEVER underestimate the depths to which liberals will stoop for power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

The 4 guys in the 4th house had one. It was also at hand. That's why they recieved no compensation.


83 posted on 06/02/2006 12:51:19 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

"sources say"

seems we should be finding and arresting these "sources say" as they should not be "saying"

If they are lawyers they should be disbarred.


84 posted on 06/02/2006 12:54:06 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

You're the joke, puke.


85 posted on 06/02/2006 1:05:04 PM PDT by sgtyork (Prove to us that you can enforce the borders first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Her name is Diana Irey and she is a great alternative to Murtha Focker. Plus, she is attractive and that is always a bonus for a public official. JK/LOL
FReepers are giving her support no matter the state they are from.
http://www.irey.com/


86 posted on 06/02/2006 1:13:52 PM PDT by JerseyDvl (If you can read this; Thank a Teacher. If you can read it in English; Thank a Veteran.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
If I were facing prosecution in this case, I'd offer to plead guilty and admit all wrongdoing after every pr!ck in the chain of command that sent me to that sh!t-hole was prosecuted for dereliction of duty.

You'd be waking up in Leavenworth the very next morning. That kind of motion would get laughed out of any court -- it would last about a nanosecond in a military court.

87 posted on 06/02/2006 7:06:48 PM PDT by Tallguy (When it's a bet between reality and delusion, bet on reality -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Took little if any resources to win the War on Telemarketeers.

If Iraq is allowed to be retaken by the forces of Terrorism you can say goodbye to a lot more than telemarketeers.

Removing the King of Terror was an absolute necessity for the region and the world. Now some of his minions and allies are making war upon the Iraqi People itself as a means of winning the War in the US media. It is only this success which keeps its hopes alive. It can only win the war HERE.


88 posted on 06/03/2006 9:00:00 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Took little if any resources to win the War on Telemarketeers.

OK. Then if the "war on terror" didn't cease to be priority #1 when the Federal anti-telemarketing legislation was passed, it certainly did when the Medicare prescription drug law was passed soon afterward.

89 posted on 06/04/2006 3:13:53 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

If trivialities can becloud our ability to comprehend what is necessary to protect our nation then we are truly forked.


90 posted on 06/05/2006 1:21:14 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: sgtyork; Alberta's Child; NormsRevenge

How could I have been so wrong? Zarqawi will not be turning himself in! The resistance goes on.


91 posted on 06/08/2006 3:02:24 PM PDT by sgtyork (Prove to us that you can enforce the borders first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson