Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paul Craig Roberts: Evil in Our Government [barf]
NewsMax ^ | 5-30-06 | Paul Craig Roberts

Posted on 06/01/2006 5:34:00 PM PDT by Calif Conservative

Evil in Our Government

Paul Craig Roberts Tuesday, May 30, 2006

Is the Bush regime a state sponsor of terrorism?

A powerful case can be made that it is.

In the past three years, the Bush regime has murdered tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians and an unknown number of Afghan ones.

U.S. Marines, members of our finest and proudest military force, are under criminal investigation for breaking into Iraqi homes and murdering entire families. In an unprecedented event, Gen. Michael Hagee, the Marine Corps commandant, has found it necessary to fly to Iraq to tell our best-trained troops to stop murdering civilians.

Hagee told the U.S. Marines: "We do not employ force just for the sake of employing force. We use lethal force only when justified, proportional and, most importantly, lawful."

The war criminals in the Bush regime have dismissed the murders as "collateral damage," but they are in fact murders. Otherwise, there would be no criminal investigations and the Marine commandant would not be burdened with the embarrassment of having to fly to Iraq to lecture U.S. Marines on the lawful use of force.

The criminal Bush regime has now murdered more Iraqis than Saddam Hussein. The Bush regime is also responsible for 20,000 U.S. casualties (dead, maimed for life and wounded).

Bush damns the "axis of evil." But who has the "axis of evil" attacked? Iran has attacked no one. North Korea has attacked no country for more than a half-century. Iraq attacked Kuwait a decade and a half ago, apparently after securing permission from the U.S. ambassador.

Isn't the real axis of evil Bush-Blair-Olmert? George Bush and Tony Blair have attacked two countries, slaughtering their citizens. Israel's Ehud Olmert is urging them on to attack a third country, Iran.

Where does the danger to the world reside? In Iran, a small religious country where the family is intact and the government is constrained by religious authority and ancient traditions, or in the United States, where propaganda rules and the powerful executive branch has removed itself from accountability by breaking the constitutional restraints on its power?

Why is the U.S. superpower orchestrating fear of puny Iran?

The U.S. government has spent the past half-century interfering in the internal affairs of other countries, overthrowing or assassinating their chosen leaders and imposing its puppets on foreign peoples.

To what country has Iran done this, or Iraq, or North Korea?

Americans think that they are the salt of the earth. The hubris that comes from this self-righteous belief makes Americans blind to the evil of their leaders. How can American leaders be evil when Americans are so good and so wonderful?

How many Serbs were slaughtered by American bombs released from high above the clouds, and for what reason? Who even remembers the propagandistic lies that the Clinton administration told us about why we absolutely had to drop bombs on the Serbs?

Wasn't it evil for the United States to bomb Iraq for a decade and to embargo medicines for children? When U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright was asked if she thought an embargo that resulted in the deaths of 500,000 Iraqi children was justified, she replied, "Yes."

The former terrible tyrant ruler of Iraq, Hussein, is on trial for killing 150 people. The U.S. government murdered 500,000 Iraqi children prior to Bush's invasion. When the U.S. government murders people, whether Serbs, Branch Davidians at Waco, Texas, or Iraqi women and children, it is "collateral damage." But we put Hussein on trial for putting down rebellions.

Gentle reader, do you believe that the Bush regime will not shoot you down in the streets if you have a rebellion?


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: assclown; morethorazineplease; paulcraigroberts; senility; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-123 last
To: WhiteGuy
let's consider each of the writer's assertions individually and determine their accuracy.

Beauty. Prepare for napalm.

121 posted on 07/25/2006 8:33:25 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (Howard Dean thinks I shot a man in Reno just to watch him die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
Beauty. Prepare for napalm.

I finally followed your link (from the future! from your tagline!) I love the smell of napalm in the morning...

I thought I was reading DUmmieFUnnies at first.

I guess ol' GWB (and his staff) would say that this is a free country, and this moonbat can say whatever he likes -- you know, high road and all that.

I wouldn't be surprised, however, if he went onto Karl's Cindy/CodePinko/LimosineLiberalWithABigMouth List.

I just wish that the staff would reference "1441" more often, especially when HE WAS SUPPOSED TO TELL US HOW HE GOT RID OF THE WMDs.

Oh, yeah -- BRING BACK THE MASS GRAVES! BRING BACK THE RAPE ROOMS!!

Why, I don't know whose regime I should pin this on -- saddam's, or Mr&MrsX42's!



122 posted on 08/27/2006 3:59:58 AM PDT by Watery Tart (Bibi: “It is our house. Israel, America... it is the same house. They want to destroy our house.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Rhiannon; shempy
Paul Craig Roberts is an economist and very fiscally conservative. He has been a good conservative until Bush was elected.I think he is basically an isolationist and therefore very much against the Iraq war and Bush. I have noticed his increasing virulent attacks against Bush.

Exactly...an old-time conservative and big hero of the Reagan Revolution alarmed by the rise of neoconservatism. While there's truth in many of his statements, he has gone the way of many paleoconservatives into nutland. :-(

Here's an article that explains his positions and seeming change. It begins...

A number of readers have asked me when did I undergo my epiphany, abandon right-wing Reaganism and become an apostle of truth and justice.

I appreciate the friendly sentiment, but there is a great deal of misconception in the question.

[...]

123 posted on 09/04/2006 7:42:47 AM PDT by Gondring (If "Conservatives" now want to "conserve" our Constitution away, then I must be a Preservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-123 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson