Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pedophiles to launch political party [Netherlands]
Yahoo News/Reuters ^ | 5/30/06 | Reuters

Posted on 05/30/2006 10:27:26 AM PDT by Dragonfly

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: Dragonfly
Dutch pedophiles are launching a political party to push for a cut in the legal age for sexual relations to 12 from 16 . . .

The age of consent is 12 in Kentucky . . . as long as the other person is within five years (17). That is true for 13, 14, and 15 year olds as well. 16 is the "no stipulations" age of consent.

21 posted on 05/30/2006 10:38:49 AM PDT by Bluegrass Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dragonfly

Speechless but not surprised...lots of el sicko two-legged beast out there...


22 posted on 05/30/2006 10:39:01 AM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc. 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jameison
Technically, wouldn't they be considered ephebephiles, instead of pedophiles?
23 posted on 05/30/2006 10:39:32 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dragonfly

Un-blinkin-believable...


24 posted on 05/30/2006 10:39:33 AM PDT by mhking ("I make my livin' on the evening news...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dragonfly

They're Progressives!


25 posted on 05/30/2006 10:39:59 AM PDT by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dragonfly
"Sex with animals should be allowed although abuse of animals should remain illegal..."

Well, I'm glad we've got that covered.
26 posted on 05/30/2006 10:41:38 AM PDT by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

"If they point to America, they will find it is legal over here (it is criminal only in certain states and under certain circumstances)."

It was legal in the states of Washington and Florida, but last I heard Washington banned it. Not sure about Florida.


27 posted on 05/30/2006 10:43:18 AM PDT by NapkinUser (Why isn't there a 'virtual fence' around the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bluegrass Conservative

That's the same in Maryland.


28 posted on 05/30/2006 10:43:19 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Kellis91789

Nah, Mo would fit right in!! ;)


29 posted on 05/30/2006 10:43:38 AM PDT by Irish_Thatcherite (~A vote for Bertie Ahern is a vote for Gerry Adams!~| IRA supporters on FR are trolls, end of story!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Dragonfly

Ginsberg, when at the ACLU, promoted the same thing.


30 posted on 05/30/2006 10:47:18 AM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dragonfly
"We are going to shake The Hague awake!"

Right....because the kids are down for their afternoon nap and they're feeling a bit "anxious."

Sickos.

31 posted on 05/30/2006 10:52:23 AM PDT by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dragonfly

Have you ever observed the actions of Cardinal Roger Mahony of the Diocese of Los Angelos?

The following article describes Cardinal Roger Mahony relative to pedophiles:




And anybody who thinks Mahony is a sincere advocate for civil disobedience should talk to protesting pro-lifers: Squeamish about getting too close to them, Mahony won't even let them collect signatures for ballot propositions on his parishes' property. Notice, too, that he now speaks of compassion as more important than law — but when common sense and basic compassion dictated that he cooperate with the authorities in protecting children from pedophile priests, he didn't, arguing that his understanding of the law didn't technically require cooperation.

Michael Baker, an ex-priest caught molesting children, has testified about Mahony's hypocritical brand of I'm-above-the-law clericalism, recounting that after he offered to turn himself in to the police, Mahony's chancery lawyer said, "Should we call the police now?" And Mahony's response was, according to Baker, "No, no, no." Mahony then assigned Baker — over the subsequent 14 years — to several parishes near schools and children.

Jurors sitting on a case involving a pedophile priest in Stockton (a priest whose ministry partially overlapped with Mahony's tenure as bishop of Stockton) concluded that Mahony didn't even respect the rules of the courtroom. In their deliberations on the size of the settlement to the victims in the case, the jurors disregarded Mahony's testimony, sizing him up as a witness who lacked credibility. One juror told the press that he "found Mahony to be utterly unbelievable."

Standing against the law, in other words, comes easily to Mahony — not because he grasps a higher law, but because his self-indulgent liberalism is essentially lawless. His left-wing clericalism means that he can ignore justly enacted positive laws with the same casualness with which he ignores inconvenient parts of canon law.

I had to laugh when I heard last week that he in effect called on Los Angeles Catholics to "fast" and "pray" that amnesty be extended to illegal immigrants. This is a cardinal who normally considers such practices ultramontane burdens — a cardinal who waives Holy Days of Obligation when they fall too close to Sunday, because he doesn't want the faithful to suffer the agony of going to church twice within three days. Yet to advance his chic liberalism he will harness the power of old-time piety and invoke weighty Catholic language he usually dismisses as too sectarian. The Church, he proudly harrumphs against a phantom threat, "is not in a position of negotiating the spiritual and the corporal works of mercy" — a phrase I've never heard him utter before.

http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/neumayr200604120719.asp




32 posted on 05/30/2006 10:52:37 AM PDT by petkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dragonfly

Dateline:


Amsterdamned.


33 posted on 05/30/2006 10:53:25 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dragonfly

It was only a matter of time....


34 posted on 05/30/2006 10:53:53 AM PDT by AlaskaErik (Everyone should have a subject they are ignorant about. I choose professional corporate sports.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dragonfly

In a related story, Michael Jackson has just announced that he is moving to The Netherlands.


35 posted on 05/30/2006 10:54:48 AM PDT by dfwgator (Florida Gators - 2006 NCAA Men's Basketball Champions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dragonfly

They have the NVD, we have the DemocRATS.


36 posted on 05/30/2006 10:54:50 AM PDT by BadAndy ("Loud mouth internet Rambo")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dragonfly
"A ban just makes children curious, safer " Ad van den Berg, one of the party's founders, told the Algemeen Dagblad (AD) newspaper.
37 posted on 05/30/2006 10:55:03 AM PDT by Tokra (I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dragonfly
The party also said everybody should be allowed to go naked in public and promotes legalizing all soft and hard drugs and free train travel for all.

What a bizarre statement. I'm picturing trains full of naked stoned Dutch people.

38 posted on 05/30/2006 10:57:42 AM PDT by Tokra (I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dragonfly
Other politicians only talk about us in a negative sense, as if we were criminals

~~~~~~~~

"as if..."???

I have lost track of how many FReepers have predicted that, if homosexuals were legitimized, the pedophiles would be right behind them, claiming to be, "normal, too"...

To all of you: You were right on!

39 posted on 05/30/2006 10:57:43 AM PDT by TXnMA (Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! Repeat San Jacinto!!! AND START IN AUSTIN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dragonfly
An opinion poll published Tuesday showed that 82 percent wanted the government to do something to stop the new party, while 67 percent said promoting pedophilia should be illegal.

So, I understand that 33 percent consider promoting pedophilia as a freedom of speech or already have such tendencies, what a pathetic clowns.

40 posted on 05/30/2006 11:00:34 AM PDT by Lukasz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson