Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Concerned About China's Military Buildup
Voice of America ^ | 23MAY06 | Al Pessin

Posted on 05/24/2006 12:47:23 AM PDT by familyop

A new report by the U.S. Defense Department says China is continuing to increase its military capabilities in ways that have already altered the regional military balance and is causing concern about China's future intentions. The annual report is required by Congress.

The report says China is increasing its force of short range ballistic missiles that could attack Taiwan and other regional targets, and looking to buy or develop more advanced and capable aircraft and ships. The report says China is also increasing its high-technology ability to disrupt other countries' access to communications, computer networks and other services essential to modern defense, and society as a whole.

Assistant Secretary of Defense Peter Rodman says China appears to be preparing to project its military power beyond its immediate surroundings. "There are indications that they are thinking more broadly and at the very beginnings, perhaps, of developing power projection for other contingencies other than Taiwan," he said.

The report says such contingencies could involve conflicts over territory or resources. Last year's report on China came to a similar conclusion. But this year, the report adds that U.S. analysts have been 'surprised' by 'the pace and scope' of the modernization of China's strategic forces. And Rodman says Chinese officials are also discussing possible revisions in their defense doctrines, including their pledge not to be the first to use nuclear weapons in any conflict.

"What is interesting to us is the fact that there seems to be a debate going on there. As their capabilities improve it is possible to speculate that they may be looking at other options," he said.

Rodman says the United States accepts Chinese assurances that the 'no first use' doctrine is still in effect, but his concern on nuclear doctrine and China's growing military capability is for the future. "Certainly they have limitations now. We don't exaggerate their capability. And they, too, seem realistic about their capability. But they seem to have a very patient strategy of investment, planning, just growing over time. And five years from now, ten years from now, they can expect that maybe the balance of forces will be different than it is now," he said.

The assistant defense secretary says U.S. concerns are heightened because, although it has made some progress toward more openness, China continues to provide very limited information on its military programs and intentions, at a time when its military spending is increasing rapidly.

China analyst Daniel Blumenthal at the American Enterprise Institute, who used to handle China issues at the defense department, says U.S. policy has been to 'go slow' with China, and try to convince its leaders to use their growing power constructively. He supports that for now, but he says a more active U.S. response in terms of increasing its own military capabilities may be needed in the future. "At this point, I think we still need to push them into areas where we might gain cooperation, but I think that you also have to know when to say that that's not working, and be prepared to really balance against this military expansion," he said.

The U.S. government report says China continues to pursue an approach articulated by the late Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping, an approach that includes quiet development and hiding the country's true military capacity. Assistant Secretary Rodman says U.S. policy-makers keep that very much in mind. "It should be obvious from this report that we're watching pretty carefully and we know what we're dealing with," he said.

China strongly criticized last year's U.S. Defense Department report on its military. U.S. officials defended that report, saying it was factual and not inflammatory. This year, they say that while there is continuing cause for concern, there are only incremental changes to report.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antiamericanaxis; buildup; chicoms; china; coldwar2; communism; india; iran; pacific; rim; russia; sco; soviets; sovietunion; taiwan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: lndrvr1972
"Hate to say it but China is the oldest civilization and will be around long after we are gone."


I won't debate that, however I do find it interesting that Wal-Mart is the devil incarnate in all things, including being responsible for China to become the monster that ate the earth.


I had occasion to purchase a "Square D" well pump switch at Ace Hardware the other day.

Seems it was made in Mexico, and Square D is owned by a French corporation.

I am now guilty of supporting the French (spit-spit) and the Mexican's. (los gringo land here we come)

Am I a loser, or what?



21 posted on 05/24/2006 4:17:48 AM PDT by G.Mason (And what is intelligence if not the craft of outthinking our adversaries?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Being currently assigned to Okinawa, I'm very aware of China's missile threat. All of us on the island are under the gun, so to speak.


22 posted on 05/24/2006 4:51:49 AM PDT by Poundstone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Waco

And Bush did what to stop it?


23 posted on 05/24/2006 4:53:04 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
Keep shopping at wal-mart folks, China needs the money.

You can't blame all of this on WM. China has infiltrated all markets because at this point the rest of the world can't compete with them. I don't see it to be in China's best interest to start a war with anyone. Why kill your best customers.
24 posted on 05/24/2006 5:12:27 AM PDT by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek
Why kill your best customers.

In June 1941 Nazi Germany's largest trading partner was the Soviet Union.

25 posted on 05/24/2006 5:19:21 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: familyop

And couple with this: About 10 years ago, didn't the PRC complain when we proposed to give/sell AEGIS-equipped ships to Taiwan because the enhanced ability to detect the PLA's increasingly aggressive activities was seen as 'provocative'? Didn't Clinton cave on this?


26 posted on 05/24/2006 5:49:00 AM PDT by walford (http://the-big-pic.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Well said.

China's been eclipsed by the War on Terror, but prior to 9/11 they were the topic around here.

Free traders don't understand that China's economy isn't about free trade, it's mercantilist and dedicated to making themselves top dog.

I'm wondering what's going to happen as energy prices go up (10% this week) ? They seem to be tweaking the nationalistic even racist tendencies of their populace, as if priming them for war. They haven't got enough women for their men, thanks to the one child policy. They're still carrying a torch over Japan's occupation.

Horney men from one-child homes, a declining economy, a strong ethnic (Han) identity, nervous political elites...
We're in for 'interesting times.'


27 posted on 05/24/2006 6:50:30 AM PDT by tsomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: familyop

This is bad news, just today morning I read in the newspaper Pakistan is buying 4 Chinese F22 frigates. China is building its navy along with that of its allies in the Indian Ocean in a big way. They are preparing for a showdown while US is caught up in Iraq and Afghanistan.


28 posted on 05/24/2006 6:54:36 AM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ainast
china just decide to invade the United States of America?

They already have.

They invaded our federal government a long time ago, and especially own Senator Feinstein and the Clintons.

They have access to the port of long beach, control both sides of the panama canal, and are positioning themselves in the caribbean and South America virtually surrounding the US.

They are building their navy, but their merchant marine is vastly formidable and much larger than ours, including their ship building capabilities.

When Hu Jintao came to visit last month, his first stop was with our 'captains of industry' not our lowly president.
29 posted on 05/24/2006 6:58:55 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn

Japan is beginning to remilitarize in response to China's movees.Besides this, there is the oil in the South China Sea.


30 posted on 05/24/2006 7:03:29 AM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ainast

"I am just wondering. Is there any country out there that could invade us. like tomorrow could china just decide to invade the United States of America?"

No. And we can't just up and invade China. However, China could invade Taiwan and dare us to intervene. With Bush in office? We would intervene. With a RAT in office? Taiwan would lose.

China could also move into Mongolia, North Korea or any country formerly occupied by the Soviet Union and there wouldn't be a thing militarily that could be done, outside of some whining from the UN.




31 posted on 05/24/2006 7:03:30 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Democrats = The Culture of Treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ainast
could china just decide to invade the United States of America?

It is not possible. Even invading Taiwan is dubious.

32 posted on 05/24/2006 10:45:40 AM PDT by A. Pole (Rasmussen: "multiculturalism cannot work as intolerant culture will impose its will on tolerant one")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander
"Considering how often the word "surprising" is applied by the analysts who study Red China's military progress, well, I wouldn't expect anything except sharp revisions downward on those time scales."

Yes. Here's our problem. Many of our officer veterans of the Vietnam years (including some in the Pentagon) continue to equate such Asians with monkeys (not me--them, as I've listened to too many of them) and assume that they are not intelligent enough to learn from our university engineering programs and to update military hardware. ...bad mistake, but what should we expect from the time of our hippies but vanities? Now the hippie generation is making big bucks ("live for today, but don't worry 'bout tomorrow, yeah, yeah") off of the Chinese.

Quite a few Freepers bow to the FAS site, too, though the FAS lefties are running nothing more than an antique show to lull us. Our US Defense publishes newer stuff than the FAS anti-defense freaks.

Sadly for all of us, they'll be even more surprised in the near future, if they don't stop underestimating certain foreign nations.
33 posted on 05/24/2006 11:35:16 AM PDT by familyop ("Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." --President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan
"This is bad news, just today morning I read in the newspaper Pakistan is buying 4 Chinese F22 frigates. China is building its navy along with that of its allies in the Indian Ocean in a big way. They are preparing for a showdown while US is caught up in Iraq and Afghanistan."

Our military itself is not so caught-up, as only a small portion of it is in those countries. Only about three of our carrier groups would probably be enough to stop worst likely expansionist move--for now.

But you are correct in that China is taking advantage of the War on Terror in general to increase its military capabilities beyond its interests. Destabilization of the Middle East has been perpetrated for similar reasons in the past.

Our politicians and media people are caught-up and are trying to interfere with the needed building of our defense. They seek to under-fund defense projects and to appease nations that are building on aggressive intentions.
34 posted on 05/24/2006 11:43:48 AM PDT by familyop ("Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." --President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: familyop

You should also see the speed of Russia's military modernization/rebuilding. It is at a pace that has never been seen, even during the height of the cold war.


35 posted on 05/24/2006 12:32:13 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

It is not just wal mart friend. It is nearly every business. Not just wal mart.


36 posted on 05/24/2006 12:33:53 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (You better prepare, the war is coming to the USA VERY SOON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

I know, now all retailers must sell Chicom goods to stay competitive, but 5 or 6 years ago it was just wal-mart. Wal-mart started it all.


37 posted on 05/24/2006 1:09:59 PM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek
China has a domestic market of over 1 billion people, the US market is less then 300 million and 5,000 miles distant. What US free traders are doing is jump starting the Chinese economy, at some point soon China domestic/Asian market will dwarf it's usa market and resources (oil/gas) will be far more important to the Chinese economy then selling to us.

Should China be able to humiliate the US say over Taiwan or some other incident US influence in the Pacific Rim will crumble and the Pacific Rim nations will ally/trade with the Chicoms not the USA.

Thank you very much free traders.

38 posted on 05/24/2006 1:20:18 PM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: tsomer; Ainast; RobbyS; EQAndyBuzz
”China's been eclipsed by the War on Terror, but prior to 9/11 they were the topic around here.”

The Muslims today remind me of the Indian Alliances a few hundred years ago.
Interesting how history kind of repeats it’s self, the savages never seem to go away.

In those days France was the primary concern for the English. Russia and China should be our primary concern today. The savages shouldn't be our main concern.

China and Russia are also working together with Muslims in the Sudan.

China has been up to last year ‘kinda’ working with the Tali-ban and Al Qaeda until Al Qaeda declared a Jihad on China. Now China has plans in the works with Russia to invade Muslim territories someplace in Kazakhstan bordering Xinjiang Province. This isn’t a matter of ‘if’ it is a matter of when they will invade.

”If china invades Taiwan or continues to build up as if it is going to, then I would bet Japan starts a serious build up as well.”

As RobbyS points out Japan is re-militarizing and at a rate nearly as fast as the Chinese though Japan has much better equipment. Japan could still be taken in the near future with the new Alliance between China and Russia.

39 posted on 05/24/2006 1:23:55 PM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* “I love you guys”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

Wal Mart did not "start it." We have been importanting goods from China well before just Wal Mart did it. The USA has always done this. Shoe makers, even baseball gloves made in other countries. You can bash Wal Mart all you want if you desire, but Wal Mart is not the causer here. Wal Mart simply followed all the others before it.


40 posted on 05/24/2006 1:27:02 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (You better prepare, the war is coming to the USA VERY SOON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson