Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who Killed the Electric Car?
http://filmforce.ign.com/articles/708/708800p1.html ^ | 5/15/06

Posted on 05/24/2006 12:29:25 AM PDT by BlueSky194

In 1996 a number of EV-1 electric cars began appearing on California's highways. The General Motors-produced vehicle was fast, ran quietly, produced no polluting exhaust and it ran without gasoline and then, suddenly, it was gone.

The documentary, Who Killed the Electric Car?, from producer Dean Devlin and filmmaker Chris Paine, chronicles the life and mysterious death of the groundbreaking vehicle, examining its cultural and economic ripple effects and how they reverberated through the halls of government and big business. Filmmakers make the case that the death of the EV-1 was, in fact, a murder. They claim to show that production of the revolutionary car was halted due to pressure from industries that would be harmed by the proliferation of electric car technology.

Who Killed the Electric Car?, a 2006 selection at the Tribeca and Sundance film festivals, interviews and investigates automakers, legislators, engineers, consumers and car enthusiasts from Los Angeles to Detroit, to work through motives and alibis, and to solve the complex mystery.

Who Killed the Electric Car?, from Sony Pictures Classics, opens in New York and L.A. on June 28 and will further expand this summer. It's been rated PG for "brief mild language."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: automakers; electriccars; energy; generalmotors; oil; oilcompanies
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: ABN 505
Makes me wonder why steam has not been used or developed further since that time.

Mainly because external combustion is not as efficient as internal combustion, but picture this scenario:

You get up in the morning to go to work. You light the fire in your boiler (now of course you're using coal because you're doing this to avoid the high price of oil based products) and wait half an hour or so until you have adequate pressure. then you drive to work. Shut off the boiler which then cools down while you're at work thus wasting all of the heat used to heat the water. Then you go to lunch. Start heating the boiler which only takes 20 minutes because it hasn't cooled to ambient just yet. You drive around, but notice although you have plenty of coal, you're getting a little low on water so you stop to add about 50 gal (400 lb) of water. On the way back you notice that the ashes are building up, so you have to stop and dump off your ashes at a government approved ecologically friendly ash dumping station. You shut off the boiler and go to work. When you quit for the day you start heating it again, and in about 20 minutes you're ready to drive. On the way home you discover that your usual route home is blocked because an accident between two steam cars caused the boilers to blow on both with catastrophic results to the occupants of the vehicles. You get home shut off the boiler, top off your on board coal supply from your bunker top off your water, and wait for the boiler to cool down so you can do your daily cleaning of the boiler tubes.

61 posted on 05/24/2006 5:58:35 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: bert
Actually electric cars are ubiquitous. You just have to go where they are.

Exactly! People are just too ambitious and want the electric car to do everything. Just use them for what they are best at.

A golf cart with a solar panel roof would make a great low speed commute vehicle to supplement a regular car if you didn't live too far from work. Use it to drive to work and back...then use the gas car for other stuff.
62 posted on 05/24/2006 6:04:43 AM PDT by \/\/ayne (Give me Liberty or give me the ACLU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Jaxter
Well heck fire, the problem with the extension cord could have been solved by using bungee cords instead of electric cords. That would have provided employment for retired sailors and ex-boy scouts, untangling the inevitable knots at major intersections.
63 posted on 05/24/2006 6:41:47 AM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (A government that will not enforce the laws of the land, is a government standing on quicksand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

"Weeee did!"

Now lets play ping pong.


64 posted on 05/24/2006 7:13:06 AM PDT by Holicheese (Stanley Cup's new home will be North Carolina!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bert

Zambonis are going electric also because of the CO2 levels in hockey rinks.
How sweet would that be to drive to work everyday on a zamboni.


65 posted on 05/24/2006 7:21:22 AM PDT by Holicheese (Stanley Cup's new home will be North Carolina!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: BlueSky194
"Who Killed The Electric Car?"

Ed Begley Jr.?

66 posted on 05/24/2006 7:25:37 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert
All golf cars are electric.

I've driven a gas-powered golf cart before.

SD

67 posted on 05/24/2006 7:30:57 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: bert
A large fraction of forklifts are electric cars on steroids.

Yes indeed, especially at food warehouses (no gas fumes)...but those huge honkin' batteries need a charge nightly of course, and as I recall from my 10 years in the cold storage biz, get replaced every few years - at a cost of some big bucks.

About three years ago, out here in the low desert, there was a guy with an EV-1 doing some testing work to see how the battery held up in our extreme summers....I stopped seeing him and the car after about a year, so I can't comment on the results.

68 posted on 05/24/2006 7:31:35 AM PDT by ErnBatavia (Meep Meep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Locomotive Breath
We couldn't go for a very long drive because it had already been driven that morning and needed to be recharged.

Out of curiosity, did you ever work out the energy costs per mile for electrics? I believe that with even our current high gasoline prices, the average for IC engines around 12 cents per mile.

69 posted on 05/24/2006 7:39:33 AM PDT by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Ditto

I used to know those numbers but can't remember any more. Sorry.


70 posted on 05/24/2006 8:03:31 AM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: I Luv Bush

Everybody likes to say Beta was the better technology, but from a consumer perspective it actually wasn't. It had one major drawback from the consumer side: tape length. Beta's max length was inconveniently short, causing it to be not really useful for the commercial video market. Also the fact that Sony kept it closed where-as VHS was open to multiple manufacturers seriously crippled the market.


71 posted on 05/24/2006 8:14:34 AM PDT by discostu (get on your feet and do the funky Alphonzo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: polymuser
And, we don't see testosterone-spiking commercials for hemi-powered golf carts smoking the course.

It seems to me that you have just stumbled onto a brilliant idea for a new NASCAR class.

72 posted on 05/24/2006 8:17:14 AM PDT by Erasmus ("Peace on you!" -- Imam Ofo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel

Something that nobody's mentioned up to this point: You have to carry at least twice as much water as you do fuel in order not to run out of water.


73 posted on 05/24/2006 8:21:38 AM PDT by Erasmus ("Peace on you!" -- Imam Ofo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell

And what's more, your return trip is free! Fast too!


74 posted on 05/24/2006 8:24:07 AM PDT by Erasmus ("Peace on you!" -- Imam Ofo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Erasmus

ROFLMAO! Just caught on to what you said.


75 posted on 05/24/2006 9:16:42 AM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (A government that will not enforce the laws of the land, is a government standing on quicksand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

Polluter! Who turns greens brown!


76 posted on 05/24/2006 9:20:27 AM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (A government that will not enforce the laws of the land, is a government standing on quicksand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel
Steam is a great idea - better than electric, in general, I think - but someone has to come up with a way to warm it up "instantly" and efficiently (you need something to make steam - fuel or electric), primarily. I have worked at a small company that uses a steam process in heat treating parts, they have a small steam boiler about 2'long and a foot in diameter,it weighs about 100 lbs, it takes less than 5 minutes to go from cold to producing steam , it uses an electric coil to make the steam. I don't know why a steam hybrid could not be made using a electric or gas powered engine for starting quickly and then have steam power take over. Seems to me that if we did not have cheap gasoline we would be driving some sort of Steam powered vehicle by now.
77 posted on 05/24/2006 9:21:23 AM PDT by ABN 505
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: ABN 505

5 min is still too long. What if you're in an emergency? You can't just turn on your steamer; or you'd have to leave it running all day!

My hope is that someone would actually find a way to make these things viable. So far, they haven't. I'm not confident of it, either, even if hopeful.

Unlike politicians and the fool sheep they herd, who think "beaming up" is a technology just around the corner!


78 posted on 05/24/2006 10:15:39 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: ABN 505

We clear cut all the virgin forests, hadn't you heard?


79 posted on 05/24/2006 10:45:39 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: BlueSky194
I'd bet a fin that the word "economics" is never uttered during this flick.

Problem is, it would cost more than 5 bucks and kill precious hours of my time to find out, and that right there would be an example of poor economics.

80 posted on 05/24/2006 10:52:09 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (© 2006, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson