LIke the last time we lonst the house, it took 40 years to get it back.
Losing is LOSING, it's is beyond ludicrous to propose losing as a winning strategy.
Gotta bump to that!
And when did we get the House back? When the congresscritters learned conservatism.
How about the idea of voting to protect the Constitution, not just saying, "Well, the Republicans aren't destroying the nation as fast as the Dems would..."
Losing as defined by whom?
The republicans?..... Then I'm not sure I care..
Conservatives? .... Seems like true conservatives are already losing... Being sold out by RINO's in the republican party..
The Voters?.... Voters choose who gets to wield power in the President's office, and the Halls of Congress.. The only way they lose is if they choose the wrong people..
I'll try to vote for the "most conservative" candidate I can find.. although lately choices have been limited..
I won't vote for a Lib or a RINO..
Just because there is an (r) behind their name means nothing.. actions mean something.. voting records mean something..
When a Lib sells me out, I pretty much expect it..
But when a republican sells me out, it really ticks me off.. and they lose my vote, permanently..
I can and do vote for Independents when they meet the conservative criteria..
I will vote for a conservative Independent over a RINO every time...
What I'm seeing in congress right now is a bunch of RINO's.. They will not get my vote, or my campaign contributions..
Bingo, doesn't take a brick in the head for most logical conservatives to figure that one out.
Ah, but if one is in fact a loser, than losing is winning! There are a host of people who love losing and will gleefully back candidates who are guaranteed losers -- such as third party supporters. (Of course, there is no "third party" in America -- it's like Gorbachev's nonexistent "third way").