Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coin image omits 'In God We Trust' [on school year book cover]
STAR-TELEGRAM ^ | 5/20/2006 | JESSAMY BROWN

Posted on 05/22/2006 3:44:32 AM PDT by weef

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: fzx12345

Thanks. I always wondered.


41 posted on 05/22/2006 5:07:24 AM PDT by keats5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: weef
From the article:
"We are a public school," he [Tom Gardner of Colleyville, president of the Liberty PTA] said. "We sure do not want to step on anybody's toes. I don't think any harm was intended."
So next year the yearbook will feature a plain cover with no text or markings at all. Gotta be PC, ya know?
42 posted on 05/22/2006 5:07:31 AM PDT by upchuck (Wikipedia.com - the most unbelievable web site in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn

Where are you?

I may have to move!


43 posted on 05/22/2006 5:07:59 AM PDT by 3D-JOY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: weef
First, elementary schools really don't need a yearbook IMHO. Second, If the yearbook wasn't there, political statements couldn't be made.

Who wrote the content of the yearbook? Who paid for its publication? What value did its creation provide to the elementary students?

44 posted on 05/22/2006 5:09:40 AM PDT by eeriegeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weef

"wanted to avoid offending students of different religions". The motto doesn't offend students of other reigions than Christianity, it offends the irreligious.


45 posted on 05/22/2006 5:17:06 AM PDT by MarxSux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weef
VOUCHERS!
46 posted on 05/22/2006 5:30:18 AM PDT by polymuser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: polymuser

Yup.


47 posted on 05/22/2006 5:38:37 AM PDT by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: weef

I wouldn't send my dog to a public school.


48 posted on 05/22/2006 5:45:39 AM PDT by Jonx6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weef
The principal is a dope. If he'd really wanted to avoid offending ppl (avoid controversy, really), then he shouldn't have used the nickel image at all. Only a moron would think using a censored nickel design was going to avoid offending ppl. Sheesh.

As for this:

She likened the situation to retailers that use "Happy Holidays" rather than "Merry Christmas" in their displays and advertising.

"First, we can't say 'Christmas' trees. It's 'holiday' trees. Then it's 'holiday' decorations," Ackerman said. "It just doesn't make any sense to me."

Happy Holidays makes perfect sense to me. I use it during the holidays for the simple reason that I don't know what holiday the other person is celebrating. Hannukah occurs around the same time as Christmas. Anyone who can't handle "Happy Holidays" is too sensitive.

That said, "holiday tree" is ridiculous. Stuff that's clearly Christmas-related should be called what it is. That idiocy is what makes ppl so nuts that they can't deal with something reasonable like "Happy Holidays."

49 posted on 05/22/2006 5:49:46 AM PDT by Huck (Hey look, I'm still here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weef
Keller administrators agreed with the decision, which Travis made in conjunction with a school parents group, district spokesman Jason Meyer said. District policy states, in part: "The District shall take no action respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech."

So it's cool that they have taken it upon themselves to remove religion and references to religion?

Sounds eerily too similar to those that participated in and condoned the crucifixion of Jesus Christ (and I am not that religious...)

The intent of our forefathers was that religion not be sponsored by the state, not that any religious symbol or connotation be removed from "the state". These are truly evil people.

50 posted on 05/22/2006 7:13:03 AM PDT by American in Singapore (Bill Clinton: The Human Stain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weef
Idiot. Options:

An overall design that just happens to obscure the offending text.

Use an E Pluribus Unum coin. It's a more meaningful and apt phrase anyway.

Don't use a friggin' coin!

51 posted on 05/22/2006 7:18:03 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

"doesnt surprise me....its Dallas"

Since when did Keller become a part of Dallas?


52 posted on 05/22/2006 7:26:43 AM PDT by politicalwit (Freedom doesn't mean a Free Pass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: weef
Janet Travis, principal of Liberty Elementary School in Colleyville, wanted to avoid offending students of different religions, a district spokesman said

Next up on the agenda to be banned:

* The phrase - 'for God's sake'
* Exclaiming 'Jesus!' or 'Christ!' when exasperated or angry
* Clothing that have a particular pattern that could be mistaken for crosses, or that have any number of lines that intersect in a crosslike pattern.
* Fish will be banned in the cafeteria, as these may remind some of the Jesus fish and might be considered offensive.
* Standard suits and dresses will now be required at graduation ceremonies, as Jesus was known to wear robes and this could be upsetting to some.

Students will be allowed, however, to use swearwords containing 'God' or 'Jesus', as banning them might interfere with their Constitutional right to use them.
53 posted on 05/22/2006 7:41:46 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Support American sovereignty - boycott employers of illegal aliens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weef
what other religion is going to be offended by "in god we trust"? none that I know of
54 posted on 05/22/2006 11:29:10 AM PDT by markman46 (engage brain before using keyboard!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChadGore

I was laughing a little at the silliness of this teacher until I got to your chilling post.


55 posted on 05/22/2006 12:30:25 PM PDT by agrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson