Skip to comments.
Coin image omits 'In God We Trust' [on school year book cover]
STAR-TELEGRAM ^
| 5/20/2006
| JESSAMY BROWN
Posted on 05/22/2006 3:44:32 AM PDT by weef
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 last
To: fzx12345
Thanks. I always wondered.
41
posted on
05/22/2006 5:07:24 AM PDT
by
keats5
To: weef
From the article:
"We are a public school," he [Tom Gardner of Colleyville, president of the Liberty PTA] said. "We sure do not want to step on anybody's toes. I don't think any harm was intended."
So next year the yearbook will feature a plain cover with no text or markings at all. Gotta be PC, ya know?
42
posted on
05/22/2006 5:07:31 AM PDT
by
upchuck
(Wikipedia.com - the most unbelievable web site in the world.)
To: mtbopfuyn
Where are you?
I may have to move!
43
posted on
05/22/2006 5:07:59 AM PDT
by
3D-JOY
To: weef
First, elementary schools really don't need a yearbook IMHO. Second, If the yearbook wasn't there, political statements couldn't be made.
Who wrote the content of the yearbook? Who paid for its publication? What value did its creation provide to the elementary students?
To: weef
"wanted to avoid offending students of different religions". The motto doesn't offend students of other reigions than Christianity, it offends the irreligious.
45
posted on
05/22/2006 5:17:06 AM PDT
by
MarxSux
To: weef
VOUCHERS!
To: polymuser
47
posted on
05/22/2006 5:38:37 AM PDT
by
cvq3842
To: weef
I wouldn't send my dog to a public school.
48
posted on
05/22/2006 5:45:39 AM PDT
by
Jonx6
To: weef
The principal is a dope. If he'd really wanted to avoid offending ppl (avoid controversy, really), then he shouldn't have used the nickel image at all. Only a moron would think using a censored nickel design was going to avoid offending ppl. Sheesh.
As for this:
She likened the situation to retailers that use "Happy Holidays" rather than "Merry Christmas" in their displays and advertising. "First, we can't say 'Christmas' trees. It's 'holiday' trees. Then it's 'holiday' decorations," Ackerman said. "It just doesn't make any sense to me."
Happy Holidays makes perfect sense to me. I use it during the holidays for the simple reason that I don't know what holiday the other person is celebrating. Hannukah occurs around the same time as Christmas. Anyone who can't handle "Happy Holidays" is too sensitive.
That said, "holiday tree" is ridiculous. Stuff that's clearly Christmas-related should be called what it is. That idiocy is what makes ppl so nuts that they can't deal with something reasonable like "Happy Holidays."
49
posted on
05/22/2006 5:49:46 AM PDT
by
Huck
(Hey look, I'm still here.)
To: weef
Keller administrators agreed with the decision, which Travis made in conjunction with a school parents group, district spokesman Jason Meyer said. District policy states, in part: "The District shall take no action respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech." So it's cool that they have taken it upon themselves to remove religion and references to religion?
Sounds eerily too similar to those that participated in and condoned the crucifixion of Jesus Christ (and I am not that religious...)
The intent of our forefathers was that religion not be sponsored by the state, not that any religious symbol or connotation be removed from "the state". These are truly evil people.
To: weef
Idiot. Options:
An overall design that just happens to obscure the offending text.
Use an E Pluribus Unum coin. It's a more meaningful and apt phrase anyway.
Don't use a friggin' coin!
To: mylife
"doesnt surprise me....its Dallas"
Since when did Keller become a part of Dallas?
52
posted on
05/22/2006 7:26:43 AM PDT
by
politicalwit
(Freedom doesn't mean a Free Pass.)
To: weef
Janet Travis, principal of Liberty Elementary School in Colleyville, wanted to avoid offending students of different religions, a district spokesman said
Next up on the agenda to be banned:
* The phrase - 'for God's sake'
* Exclaiming 'Jesus!' or 'Christ!' when exasperated or angry
* Clothing that have a particular pattern that could be mistaken for crosses, or that have any number of lines that intersect in a crosslike pattern.
* Fish will be banned in the cafeteria, as these may remind some of the Jesus fish and might be considered offensive.
* Standard suits and dresses will now be required at graduation ceremonies, as Jesus was known to wear robes and this could be upsetting to some.
Students will be allowed, however, to use swearwords containing 'God' or 'Jesus', as banning them might interfere with their Constitutional right to use them.
53
posted on
05/22/2006 7:41:46 AM PDT
by
reagan_fanatic
(Support American sovereignty - boycott employers of illegal aliens)
To: weef
what other religion is going to be offended by "in god we trust"? none that I know of
54
posted on
05/22/2006 11:29:10 AM PDT
by
markman46
(engage brain before using keyboard!!!)
To: ChadGore
I was laughing a little at the silliness of this teacher until I got to your chilling post.
55
posted on
05/22/2006 12:30:25 PM PDT
by
agrace
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson