Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More Women Not Waiting For Mr. Right
CBS2CHICAGO ^ | 18 May 2006 | CBS2CHICAGO

Posted on 05/21/2006 11:55:33 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560 ... 601-617 next last
To: rintense

I live in Virginia and don't remember anything like that; can you give some reference?


521 posted on 05/22/2006 5:48:59 AM PDT by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 520 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
Why?

The two situations say two very different things about the people involved.

Military wives who lose their husbands during war intended to provide a home with a mother and father. They were willing to do what was necessary to give their children what they needed. This gives a strong testament to the character of both the mother and the father.

It does not give a strong testament to a mother when she doesn't even attempt to provide a home with a mother and father for their children, even after study after study after study shows that an environment with both parents is ideal for children.
522 posted on 05/22/2006 5:49:40 AM PDT by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies]

To: 7thson

That's not true. The majority of sperm banks offer photos of the donor, both as a baby and an adult. They also offer 'open' donor agreements where the sperm donor can choose whether they want any future contact with children. Some donors even write letters to their future children.


523 posted on 05/22/2006 5:50:07 AM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 516 | View Replies]

To: linda_22003

I'm not sure it was Virgina. Let me go check an email...


524 posted on 05/22/2006 5:51:00 AM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 521 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
So much for a normal, 2 parent (Mom and Dad) family. Further leading to moral decay and a further incidence of dysfunctional youth.

BLAH!
525 posted on 05/22/2006 5:55:04 AM PDT by roaddog727 (eludium PU36 explosive space modulator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Married a woman with two daughters. She always puts the girls first - and so do I!


526 posted on 05/22/2006 5:57:27 AM PDT by Little Ray (I'm a reactionary, hirsute, gun-owning, knuckle dragging, Christian Neanderthal and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
to purposely rob children of their patrimony is the greatest act of selfishness I could ever imagine.

The consequences of these stupid people will bear sour fruit indeed for us all.

527 posted on 05/22/2006 6:06:13 AM PDT by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81

I dated a guy who had a child (that didn't live with him). I didn't mind in the least bit. When his child visited, he kept emailing me saying things like he couldn't wait for his son to go home so we could date again. That was a huge turn-off as well as a big red flag, and we broke up not long after.


528 posted on 05/22/2006 6:07:39 AM PDT by Seamoth (Hemocyanin, chlorophyll, and hemoglobin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies]

To: ProCivitas
On a serious note, I suppose men don't value their chasity as much as they should nowadays.

Neither do women. The more convicted of women just lie about it.
529 posted on 05/22/2006 6:10:36 AM PDT by Seamoth (Hemocyanin, chlorophyll, and hemoglobin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 515 | View Replies]

To: rintense

It's not Big Brother. It's the rest of us who are tired of paying for the dumb mistakes of halfwits who bring children without a father into the world, and think that's fine.

We all take up the slack for the women who naively think they can be mother and father to a child.


530 posted on 05/22/2006 6:10:42 AM PDT by David Allen (the presumption of innocence - what a concept!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 520 | View Replies]

To: Seamoth
I dated a guy who had a child (that didn't live with him). I didn't mind in the least bit. When his child visited, he kept emailing me saying things like he couldn't wait for his son to go home so we could date again. That was a huge turn-off as well as a big red flag, and we broke up not long after.

Probably a good decision. It doesn't say anything good about him. The reason my relationship ended with the single mom I was seeing was because she absolutely refused to attend church with me. That's pretty much a show-stopper for me. My parents never worked that little detail out before they got married and it ended in total disaster.
531 posted on 05/22/2006 6:13:19 AM PDT by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 528 | View Replies]

To: David Allen

Assuming you mean they will seek government assistance, I encourage you to look at the statistics of those who choose to be single mothers. They are financially secure and will not rely on the government for support.


532 posted on 05/22/2006 6:14:43 AM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 530 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81
The reason my relationship ended with the single mom I was seeing was because she absolutely refused to attend church with me.

Good decision. If I had to name the third strongest commandment in the Bible, it's not to be unequally yoked. It's a pattern that is echoed throughout the Old Testament as well as repeated in the New Testament. God even forced a prophet to exile his pagan wife & children (can't remember for the life of me which one that is, though), and there's also Esau and Solomon and Samson, among others.
533 posted on 05/22/2006 6:21:38 AM PDT by Seamoth (Hemocyanin, chlorophyll, and hemoglobin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 531 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

I don't mind progress, but some of these people have a sinister agenda. I get a little nervous when man plays God. Who wouldn't like to manipulate genetic material for a truly good reason? I'm worried about what happens when you get the ones who do it for other purposes.

Lol, I'll try and relax ;-)


534 posted on 05/22/2006 6:37:48 AM PDT by TheSpottedOwl (If you don't understand the word "Illegal", then the public school system has failed you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: rintense

If you think the bulk of these single mothers are paying their own way, you're wrong. We take up the slack financially almost across the border, but the bigger cost is the result in the kids. Boys and girls running loose, getting in trouble, having kids, and generally NOT being good citizens.

If she doesn't have a man, she shouldn't be making babies. The arrogance of women today who think they're smarter than nature! YOU'RE NOT A FATHER, LADIES!!


535 posted on 05/22/2006 6:49:12 AM PDT by David Allen (the presumption of innocence - what a concept!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 532 | View Replies]

To: David Allen

Make ^^^that "almost across the board."


536 posted on 05/22/2006 6:50:14 AM PDT by David Allen (the presumption of innocence - what a concept!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 535 | View Replies]

To: David Allen
If you think the bulk of these single mothers are paying their own way, you're wrong.

The bulk of women who choose to become single mothers by using a sperm bank are paying their own way- artificial insemination isn't cheap, for one thing. These women tend to be professionals in their 30's or older.

537 posted on 05/22/2006 6:55:08 AM PDT by LWalk18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 535 | View Replies]

To: LWalk18

Those make up a small number of the problem, but certainly, that group is better able financially and typically not a drain on the local treasury. But the fact that they can afford an illiterate nanny from Salvador to raise their fatherless child is not a good thing, either.

If you're too busy to find a husband, you're too busy to have a child. Besides, we don't NEED women like that having children. They're failed the life test, so why should we help them perpetuate themselves?


538 posted on 05/22/2006 7:36:35 AM PDT by David Allen (the presumption of innocence - what a concept!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 537 | View Replies]

To: David Allen
Must be nice to live in that quaint box. Societies ills aren't all because of single mothers. There's a fair share of screwed up kids from allegedly happy homes too. It is sorry to say, but we no longer live in an ideal world.

Let me ask you the same question I asked another person; if these women chose to sleep around and get pregnant, would that be a more satisfactory situation?

539 posted on 05/22/2006 7:49:51 AM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 535 | View Replies]

To: rintense
"So you think having a father, any man who fell on a woman and created a child AND is completely worthless as a father, a father who is absent as a father, let alone human being, is better than having no father at all?"

No absolutely not, which is why a woman waits until she meets someone who actually wants to have children, and will be a good father. You seem to feel all men are lousy fathers, and that is just not true. Most of the "father problem" in this country is due to women/girls having relationships with men who obviously are not the type to stick around, and then even though they are fully aware of that, they have kids with them anyway.
540 posted on 05/22/2006 8:14:27 AM PDT by gidget7 (PC is the huge rock, behind which lies hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 436 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560 ... 601-617 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson