Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The myth of the easy machine gun
The Star ^ | 5/21/6 | Michael Bowers

Posted on 05/21/2006 8:15:36 AM PDT by SmithL

A ban on assault rifles, pushed by the mayor of Chicago and our governor, is moldering in the state House Rules Committee. Lawmakers can take no action until they reconvene in October. And even then, there's little chance supporters can pick up the three additional votes they need to send the bill to the Senate.

But like the villain at the end of a movie, the assault rifle ban never dies. It's just wounded, waiting to come back when you're not looking. So I thought I would look into the validity of its major argument. That is, this notion that it's easy to convert a semi-automatic rifle (legal) into a fully automatic rifle (illegal), also known as a machine gun (illegal).

I've been following the debate. One point always seems to go unexplained. Once some concerned police chief declares that semi-automatic rifles are dangerously easy to convert, the discussion leaps elsewhere. No details of the conversion task are forthcoming.

So I called a spokesman for Gov. Blagojevich in Chicago. Could you explain, I asked. How do you do this job anyway? Do you need a screwdriver? A power drill? How long does it take? Could the governor's office be a little more explicit about the mechanics of the threat?

I gave the helpful spokesman a day to do a little research, then called back. He told me had learned the root of the problem is the "conversion kit," something that allows you to replace a certain part in the rifle and make it a machine gun.

I see. Do you know the name of this part? He didn't. In fact, as he readily acknowledged, he knew almost nothing about guns at all. Not that there's anything wrong with that. He did tell me: "It's very easy if . . .

(Excerpt) Read more at starnewspapers.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2a; 2ndamendment; automatic; bang; banglist; ckc; firearms; guns; machinegun; mg; myth; rkba; secondamendment; semiautomatic; sks; sksconversion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
To: Red6
It doesn't matter. All that counts is that he makes some statement that the "popular opinion polls" show is supported by the masses who shape their opinions based on TV shows.

It didn't help when, during the "assault" weapon ban debate, every nightly newscast without fail showed a film clip of a full auto weapon being fired.

21 posted on 05/21/2006 8:51:13 AM PDT by OSHA (Chuck Norris sends Karl Rove Christmas cards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LoneRangerMassachusetts
Its worth noting that the M-1 could have easily had full auto capability and a removable magazine, like the M-14, but the military thought it would be far more lethal if the soldiers were to aim vice spray.

Also worth note is that after going the selective fire route, the U.S. military decided to introduce burst selection in order to gain more lethality over full auto.

Full auto is only a plus at close quarters or when using it as a psychological tool to get peoples heads down.
22 posted on 05/21/2006 9:00:51 AM PDT by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Semi-automatic versions of military full auto guns, in order to be approved for sale by the BATFE, must differ enough internally, so that you cant even use or install the military internals and make it full-auto. I am not talking about just complex missing parts, but pin holes and part alignments have been moved on the civilian version. If you have the knowledge and machine tools to convert one, then you could also build the entire gun from scratch.
23 posted on 05/21/2006 9:11:55 AM PDT by Boiling point (When the GOP asks for donations, send them PESOs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
Despite that, this is a good piece and it explains that the conversion isn't going to be done by a schoolkid with a nail file and a screwdriver.

Never mind how "easy" it is to convert, I'm still looking for the klinton-era web sites where "chilron" could just click a mouse and get an automatic weapon, for free. I'm too lazy to risk a functional semi trying to convert it into something I can't hit the broad side of a barn with.

Despite all the wonderful search engines today, I still can't find those "readily available" sites that contain perfect images of American currency, ready to be cranked out with any publishing software on any ol' kind of printer. I guess it's just something more of the golden era of the klintons we've lost.

24 posted on 05/21/2006 9:18:50 AM PDT by 300winmag (Overkill never fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
The true motive behind this ban is to take another sneaky step toward prohibition of all private firearms of every kind.

Bingo

25 posted on 05/21/2006 9:29:38 AM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

Or the M3 grease gun... I favor long shot accuracy myself but that is a different subject.


26 posted on 05/21/2006 9:42:16 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LoneRangerMassachusetts

My wife and I own a fair collection of weapons including several registered full autos.In my opinion,the most deadly gun we have is a Remington 700 heavy barrel.Easily effective to 800 meters if you have the skills to use it properly.


27 posted on 05/21/2006 9:44:58 AM PDT by Farmer Dean (Every time a toilet flushes,another liberal gets his brains.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
It's easy to modify something like an SKS so it will "probably" fire multiple rounds without you having to pull the trigger for each one. Indeed, if you stick some gunk in the bolt so the firing pin jams forward, it will probably fire a bunch of rounds without you having to pull the trigger at all.

Of course, such a weapon would be extremely dangerous to everyone--including the shooter. For safe operation, locked-breach firearms need a mechanism to ensure that a round cannot be fired before be breech is locked. This is typically handled by disconnecting the trigger from the sear until the bolt carrier is fully forward. Disabling this mechanism may cause such a firearm to fire full auto, but only until it jams on an improperly-ejected or loaded cartridge, blows up from a ruptured casing, stops because the hammer either falls before it can fire a round or else snags on the bolt carrier, or has some other calamity.

28 posted on 05/21/2006 9:46:03 AM PDT by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
How does the amount of lead that a blunderbus could fire in less than a second compare with the amount of lead an M-16 could fire in 10 seconds (using a standard magazine)?

For that matter, how does a "sporting" shotgun like the 870 (4+1 capacity) compare? How about with a still-legal 6+1 capacity?

29 posted on 05/21/2006 9:48:09 AM PDT by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

*


30 posted on 05/21/2006 9:52:55 AM PDT by Sam Cree (Delicacy, precision, force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean

Winchester M70 in .30-06 w/ 4x12 40mm scope. Dead on at 750 yards...8-D


31 posted on 05/21/2006 9:57:13 AM PDT by Lancer_N3502A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: OSHA
People base the "opinions" on shows like Law and Order. The rest is done by our factual MSM which reports about bolt action 22 caliber assault rifles.
32 posted on 05/21/2006 10:14:13 AM PDT by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: paul51; SmithL

It's an incremental strategy. First the "machine guns" because they're scary and dangerous. Then "assault weapons" and semi-automatics because they look and sound scary and dangerous. Next, handguns because they are easily concealed. Then rifles, because they are too powerful and accurate. Shotguns? Devastating wounds and no one needs to hunt anymore. Anything left? Grab that too. There. Peace and utopia.


33 posted on 05/21/2006 10:14:37 AM PDT by Sender (“The beginning of wisdom is to call things by their right names.” – Old Chinese proverb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: OSHA
during the "assault" weapon ban debate

The absolutely best statement of ignorance I have ever heard came from Detroit's WXYZ reporter Bill Proctor who was reporting on a shooting that occured in Detroit.

He said "...police are looking for a SMITH AND WESSON .45 CALIBER GLOCK PISTOL......

He not only said it once but twice in the 6:00 a.m. news hour so it was not a mistake of my hearing going bad........

34 posted on 05/21/2006 10:17:36 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Don't make me have to call Jack Bauer.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DJ Taylor

People buy those DIAS'es and find out that it's not a solution for several reasons that I won't list here. In short, it's not enough.


35 posted on 05/21/2006 10:19:14 AM PDT by The KG9 Kid (Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DTogo

Funny how Journalists know so little of guns, yet write so much about them, as they do about military and war...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Funny how liberal politicians and their robotic disciples know so little of guns,the military, and the cost of freedom, yet they rail on and on and on with their endless PC palaver.


36 posted on 05/21/2006 10:28:12 AM PDT by OkeyDokeyOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

The simple fact that full-auto guns aren't being illegally manufactured, despite the ease with which that could be done, indicates how misguied the "assault weapon" argument is.

With a small, but modern machine shop and 2-4 people, hundreds of guns a week could be produced.


37 posted on 05/21/2006 10:31:16 AM PDT by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: randog

This all got started because it came out that the original MAC-10 could be converted to full auto in about ten seconds with a flat head screwdriver. That was the 1980s and things really went crazy from there.


38 posted on 05/21/2006 10:32:46 AM PDT by ExSoldier (Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 43north
I once got into an argument with a know-it-all hoplophobe at my brother's house who claimed that all you had to do to convert an AK rifle from semi to full-auto was file down "some part". I asked if he meant the sear. "I guess so." I then proceeded to educate him that the only thing you would get with a filed-down sear on an AK was an inoperable weapon. That really ticked him off so he did the usual liberal thing and started ad hominem attacks on me, the NRA, the Republican Party, and every other group he did not agree with.

You do realize that, in his mind, he won that argument?

39 posted on 05/21/2006 10:34:36 AM PDT by Lazamataz (If a woman gives birth in Indiana, is she a Hoosier Mama?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco
And the BS anti gun machine continues to lie. I'm a retired combat vet, and a gun smith.
The semi-auto versions of the popular military look alike rifles are a pain in the butt to convert. You can buy a set of templates but you better be a machinist and a gunsmith or you will never get the job done. The first thing you have to do is open up the rifle and toss out most of the existing parts then turn on the lathe and mill and make the replacement parts. After a few days machining the new parts, put on your gunsmith hat and fit them all together. Now all you have to do is polish all the surfaces and assemble your new toy for test firing.
Now you have 4 days into your project and in may or may not fire like you want it to. You have already committed a felony and it will cost you your ability to work on or even own firearms for the rest of your life.
Because of the loss of income you won't be able to pay the house payment or buy food for your kids. I'm sure that all of you can imagine the long line of college educated smith/machinists who are lined up to preform this conversion just so they can ruin their lives and spend some time in prison. The anti gun idiots do not have a dozen functioning brain cell between them.
40 posted on 05/21/2006 10:36:36 AM PDT by oldenuff2no
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson