Why the Media Doesn't See its TREASON

There is one concept that every red-blooded American must understand--, WHEN AN INDIVIDUAL OR GROUP ATTACKS THEIR ENEMY THEY DO NOT CONSIDER THEMSELVES TERRORISTS NOR DO THEY SEE THEIR TREASON. The American news media does not see its TREASON and its TERRORISM when it is attacking America, President Bush, morals, values, undermining families, attacking Republicans, lying to the American people, or just promoting propaganda. America and the public are their enemy.

It must be noted that this entire expose is based on a WELL-DOCUMENTED, VERIFIABLE PLAN by the Democratic Party, to work with the media to DESTROY AMERICA so they can beat Bush and the Republicans. It didn't work for the 2004 elections, but they are working overtime at implementing EVERY ONE of the items they listed to attack America.

Look at the routine media disinformation campaign, that often relies upon "anonymous sources" has become so routine that it is frightening. So much so, if you carefully evaluate it you'd almost think that Al Qaeda runs the "mainstream" media newsrooms in America. Dan Rather's 60 Minutes debacle taught these traitors that they must be careful with their Hollywood manufactured lies and citing to sources that might be able to be checked.

Take for example USA Today's most recent FRAUD on the public, suggesting that America's domestic phone calls are being collected and reviewed by the NSA. Yet all of the major phone companies deny this has taken place. In some instances, such as that with Verizon, the company even suggests that the specific records USA Today reports on do not even exist in some cases because of the way their network equipment is designed. [FN1]

The media hate machine, that routinely attacks Bush, Republicans, and anything representing morality or values was absolutely incensed that Americans were not angry when they found out about INTERNATIONAL calls to potential terrorists being intercepted. So USA Today had to re-invent the story with supposed spying on domestic calls.

What we have is widespread media TREASON. It's no longer about political ideology, it's about attacking, lying, manipulating and decieving the American public during wartime. Its sole purpose is to both undermine the war and to attack Conservatives and Republicans during an election cycle.

Consider other recent "scandals" manufactured by a treasonous media. The New York Times simply manufactured a statement, from a public official, out of thin air about "secret CIA prisons." [FN2] The insanity of the media, the treason, the misinformation campaigns and the outright manipulation of the public are very similar to the IDENTICAL tactics that the Communists used during the Korean and VietNamese conflicts. In this case, there are numerous examples of actual fliers and leaflets we can see from these conflicts that were used by the Communists during wartime. [FN3] In this case, we have the American media as traitors, committing TREASON to advance their twisted agenda to elect as many Democrats as possible and stop any real reform in government.

Let's take a moment and look closely at what the Wartime Communist, and the American Media propaganda goals looks like:

These are ALL wartime Communist propaganda themes. Now carefully consider the media message we hear almost every day:

All we hear about, like a constant drumbeat from the media terrorists is "the war was for Halliburton," we "went to war for oil," and a whole host of other issues. It has become so routine in almost all media reports that it is almost taken for granted. Watch carefully when you see CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS and other news outlets. Their Communist propaganda might as well have been desiged by the Chinese Communists pumping out leaflets during previous wars. And let's not forget the DIRECT CONNECTION of the Democratic Party to the Chinese for their fundraising. I wonder where Soros gets all that money to attack America from. I digress.

All we hear from the media, like a constant propaganda drumbeat from the media is that the war was based on lies. That we got it all wrong, that George Bush set about to fulfill some personal agenda as a favor to his father. The common implied Communist slogan from the media, and directlly stated Communist slogan from the left and the Democrats is that "Bush Lied, Thousands Died." I really have to wonder how much they paid to slick New York advertising companies to come up with the typical propaganda sloganeering.

Here are just a few of the verifiable facts that the media intentionally misleads the American public about:

And this is just the TIP OF THE ICEBERG! There is so much proof that the media and the Democratic Party are intentionally deceiving, undermining, and attacking America that those who don't consider America their enemy can only conclude that the media and the Democratic Party are engaged in TREASON!

Iraq had WMDs and the desire for stockpiles; links to al Qaeda; links to other terror organizations; had committed genocide against the Iraqis (sometimes with WMDs); and was a threat to the security of the United States and the world. [FN7] [FN8]

All we hear about is the body count from the news media and the Democratic Party. This is clearly designed to create frustration within America, and at the same time to plant the seeds of fear and concern in the troops minds. It is almost as if the media and the Democrats "prance with glee" at announcing another road side bombing, or another dead soldier. But watch how they howl when one of their own gets injured.

The media and the Associated Press use Hollywood and New York style marketing techniques to hide their motives. How could you argue with rows, and rows of caskets full of dead soldiers with flags draped over them?

Let's not forget the routine lies about Guantanamo Bay. Apparently to the media, "torture and abuse" means feeding potential terrorists lemon-chicken and fresh vegetables. In fact, the lies from the Democrats, given airtime and promoted by the media about "filthy" prisons and horrible conditions at Guantanamo are nothing but "giving aid and comfort" to America's enemies. [FN9]

The constant drumbeat of the dangers of death, bombs, and other issues in Iraq is designed for one purpose, to damage the American military's ability to recruit. This is a seditious, potentially terrorist act in and of itself. The dirty little secret that both the Democrats AND the media knows is that IRAQ IS SAFER THAN MANY MAJOR U.S. CITIES RUN BY DEMOCRATS! [FN10] I wonder why the Democrats and the media don't report "we have Lost the War in New Orleans, DC, and Detroit." The reason is that it doesn't fit their Communist anti-war propaganda.

Newsweek faked a story on the Koran, and it can't be for any other reason that to inflame hatred of the United States and cause more American troops to be murdered.

The media routinely creates scenarios that are intentionally designed to KILL more American soldiers. They love it, it makes for "great leftist theatre" and a few dead, maimed, and brutalized bodies might help get more Democrats elected. Their hatred of America and their bloodlust is obvious when you consider the overall madness of the media.

Look at the FRAUD of the recent Pulitzer Prize awarded to the media LIES about "secret CIA prisons." The entire story has since been proven to be a con, and there is no evidence of any such prisons existing anywhere, yet the media never gives up on attacking Bush, America, or destabilizing the country. They never give up on encouraging more hatred of the United States. [FN11]

Coming soon, an expose on how the Clinton Administration put "plants" in various government bureaucratic posts to undermine Bush and the Republicans. Even if it meant leaking sensitive or classified information; even if it means using Federal Attorneys General to attack conservatives and Christians (can we say, criminal charges against Philadelphia gay protesters); even if it means that America could be attacked again.

Resources about Democrat Corruption, the Anti-War "movement's" Anti-Americanism and pro-terrorism, and perverted media machine

{Yawn}...

On June 9th [2004], the UN Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission briefed the Security Council about the export of Iraqi WMD, missile and nuclear components shipped out of Iraq before, during and after the invasion. As reported by MENL news service, UNMOVIC acting executive chairman Demetrius Perricos told the Council, "The removal of these materials from Iraq raises concerns with regard to proliferation risks," and said inspectors found Iraqi WMD and missile components shipped abroad that still contained UN inspection tags.

The World Tribune reported on Perricos's briefing. "He said the Iraqi facilities were dismantled and sent both to Europe and around the Middle East at the rate of about 1,000 tons of metal a month... The Baghdad missile site contained a range of WMD and dual-use components, UN officials said. They included missile components, reactor vessel and fermenters ... required for the production of chemical and biological warheads. 'It raises the question of what happened to the dual-use equipment, where is it now and what is it being used for,' Perricos's spokesman, said. 'You can make all kinds of pharmaceutical and medicinal products with a fermenter. You can also use it to breed anthrax.'"

Source

Retired Air Force Lt. Gen. James Clapper, head of the National Imagery and Mapping Agency, said vehicle traffic photographed by U.S. spy satellites indicated that material and documents related to the arms programs were shipped to Syria."

Source

"Last month Moshe Yaalon, who was Israel's top general at the time, said Iraq transported WMD to Syria six weeks before Operation Iraqi Freedom began.

Last March, John A. Shaw, a former U.S. deputy undersecretary of defense for international technology security, said Russian Spetsnaz units moved WMD to Syria and Lebanon's Bekaa Valley.

"While in Iraq I received information from several sources naming the exact Russian units, what they took and where they took both WMD materials and conventional explosives," Mr. Shaw told NewsMax reporter Charles Smith.

Retired Marine Lt. Gen. Michael DeLong was deputy commander of Central Command during Operation Iraqi Freedom. In September 2004, he told WABC radio that "I do know for a fact that some of those weapons went into Syria, Lebanon and Iran."

In January 2004, David Kay, the first head of the Iraq Survey Group which conducted the search for Saddam's WMD, told a British newspaper there was evidence unspecified materials had been moved to Syria from Iraq shortly before the war.

"We know from some of the interrogations of former Iraqi officials that a lot of material went to Syria before the war, including some components of Saddam's WMD program," Mr. Kay told the Sunday Telegraph.

Also that month, Nizar Nayuf, a Syrian journalist who defected to an undisclosed European country, told a Dutch newspaper he knew of three sites where Iraq's WMD was being kept. They were the town of al Baida near the city of Hama in northern Syria; the Syrian air force base near the village of Tal Snan, and the city of Sjinsar on the border with Lebanon.

In an addendum to his final report last April, Charles Duelfer, who succeeded David Kay as head of the Iraq Survey Group, said he couldn't rule out a transfer of WMD from Iraq to Syria.

"There was evidence of a discussion of possible WMD collaboration initiated by a Syrian security officer, and ISG received information about movement of material out of Iraq, including the possibility that WMD was involved. In the judgment of the working group, these reports were sufficiently credible to merit further investigation," Mr. Duelfer said."

Source

"The short answer to the question of where the WMD Saddam bought from the Russians went was that they went to Syria and Lebanon," former Deputy Undersecretary of Defense John A. Shaw told an audience Saturday at a privately sponsored "Intelligence Summit" in Alexandria, Va. (www.intelligencesummit.org).

Source

"We are not talking about a large stockpile of weapons," he said. "But we know from some of the interrogations of former Iraqi officials that a lot of material went to Syria before the war, including some components of Saddam's WMD programme. Precisely what went to Syria, and what has happened to it, is a major issue that needs to be resolved."

Source

"Two days before the war, on March 17th, we saw through multiple intelligence channels - both human intelligence and techinical (satellite,eavesdrop) intelligence - large caravans of people and things, including some of the top 55 Iraqis, going to Syria."

Source

In in 1998, an Arab intelligence officer, who knows Saddam personally, predicted in Newsweek: "Very soon you will be witnessing large-scale terrorist activity run by the Iraqis." The Arab official said these terror operations would be run under "false flags" --spook-speak for front groups--including bin Laden's organization.

Then there were the predictions by an Iraqi with ties to Iraqi intelligence, Naeem Abd Mulhalhal, in Qusay's own newspaper several weeks before the attacks that stated bin Laden would “demolish the Pentagon after he destroys the White House and ”bin Laden would strike America “on the arm that is already hurting.” (referencing a second IRAQI sponsored attack on the World Trade Center). Another reference to New York was “[bin Laden] will curse the memory of Frank Sinatra everytime he hears his songs.” (e.g., “New York, New York”) which identified New York, New York as a target. Mulhalhal also stated, “The wings of a dove and the bullet are all but one and the same in the heart of a believer." which references an airplane attack.

The Arabic language daily newspaper Al-Quds Al-Arabic also cited the cooperation between Iraq, bin Laden and Al December 1998 editorial, which predicted that “President Saddam Hussein, whose country was subjected to a four day air strike, will look for support in taking revenge on the United States and Britain by cooperating with Saudi oppositionist Osama Bin-Laden, whom the United States considers to be the most wanted person in the world.” This info is in the link provided below. How could these people have had foreknowledge without Iraq being involved?

Source for this info

Warning...slow loading .pdf file. This was from a lawsuit filed against Iraq after 9/11...the court ruled against Iraq.

There was also another lawsuit filed by the family of John O’Neill (a former FBI agent who captured Ramzi Yousef after the 1993 WTC bombings) after he died in the WTC on 9/11. His personal files from his years of traveling around the world investigating al-Qaeda are were used as evidence in the lawsuit. The evidence includes documents unearthed in the headquarters of the Mukhabarat (Iraq's intelligence service) and information gleaned from the interrogation of both al-Qaeda and Iraqi prisoners. (Link below). It also quotes Vincent Cannistraro, the former CIA counter-terrorism chief, who stated in October 2000 that Iraq had been wanting to carry out terrorist attacks, and that the Iraqi military had been in contact with Osama bin Laden.

Click Here

We know from these IIS documents that beginning in 1992 the former Iraqi regime regarded bin Laden as an Iraqi Intelligence asset. We know from IIS documents that the former Iraqi regime provided safe haven and financial support to an Iraqi who has admitted to mixing the chemicals for the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center. We know from IIS documents that Saddam Hussein agreed to Osama bin Laden's request to broadcast anti-Saudi propaganda on Iraqi state-run television. We know from IIS documents that a "trusted confidante" of bin Laden stayed for more than two weeks at a posh Baghdad hotel as the guest of the Iraqi Intelligence Service.

Abu Nidal, September 11 and Saddam The terrorist network may be closer knit than we think.

Weekly Standard: The Mother of All Connections

List of newspaper article in the 90's which mention the world's concern regarding the growing relationship between OBL and Saddam:

America Versus Americans