Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

James Woolsey (Former CIA Director) Comments on Clarke + Ties between Iraq & AlQaeda (MUST READ!)
CNN (Lou Dobbs Interview) ^ | 3/23/04 | James Woolsey / CNN Moneyline

Posted on 03/23/2004 8:52:48 PM PST by Steven W.

DOBBS: ... My next guest served as director of the CIA for two years during president Clinton's first term. James Woolsey joins us now from our Washington bureau.

It's good to have you here.

The fact is that there seems to be plenty of blame placed on both the Clinton administration and the Bush administration. Are you surprised that it's being so even-handed, this commission?

JAMES WOOLSEY, FMR. CIA DIRECTOR: Well, I'm glad if that's the approach, because they really do need to look at the whole picture. I think that one very important issue here, Lou is whether there had been any ties between Iraq and al Qaeda back in the 90s. And, you know, George Tenet wrote in 2002, October 7, to the Senate, saying that there were senior level contacts going back ten years, senior al Qaeda in Iraq and training by the Iraqis of al Qaeda in, quote, "poisons, gases and conventional explosive."

So although there are a number of people, some of who served at senior levels in the Clinton administration, who don't want there to have been any contacts of any kind and don't want to admit it between al Qaeda and Iraq, I think including Dick Clarke, because then they would be charged with not having done enough to lean on Saddam. I think those contacts are clear at least in George Tenet's eyes and there's been more detail come out since.

DOBBS: Dick Clarke, Richard Clarke, asserts there were no clear ties between the September 11 attacks and Iraq. You obviously -- what would be the reason for him to say? He was in charge of counterterrorism at that point.

WOOLSEY: There may not have been Iraqi ordering of 9/11. The contacts going back a long time are clear. Clarke, on page 95 of his book, which I've just been reading, has at least three important misstatements. First of all, he does not seem to recognize at all that one of the major plotters in the '93 attack on the World Trade Center was an Iraqi citizen, went back to Iraq after the attack, was seen by ABC News in Baghdad outside his father's home and was told that he was being taken care of by the Iraqi government. And reports of documents we captured during the invasion indicate that Yassin was on a monthly stipend from the Iraqi government and was given a house. Why would the Iraqis do that with one of the World Trade Center bombers of '93 unless they had some kind of relationship with him. Clarke doesn't even seem to be curious about something like that.

DOBBS: Jim, one of the things that struck me in today's testimony, listening to former Senator Bob Kerrey, who I thought did a remarkable, candid, straightforward, evenhanded job, he goes back through, actually the late 80s, 90s, through the Clinton administration, through the Bush administration, the USS Cole, the first attack on the World Trade Center, the millennium attacks, the attacks on our embassies in Africa, the USS Cole and, of course, September 11. My God, all of that was known to be al Qaeda. How in the world could two administrations frankly be so ineffective in dealing with a demonstrated threat?

WOOLSEY: Part of the problem may have been that some of the senior analysts in CIA, DIA and some of the White House staffers got locked into early the view that al Qaeda had nothing at all to do under any circumstances with any governments and they missed some connection with governments. Look, Clarke in his book creates out of whole cloth the notion that some of us whom he calls part of a cult believe that Ramzi Yousef was not really in prison in Colorado. In fact, he was, as Clarke puts it, lounging beside Saddam Hussein as a mastermind of Iraqi intelligence during the 90s. It's nonsense. None of us has said anything remotely like that.

We're curious about whether or not this young Pakistani who lived in Kuwait was born there, Abdul Bassir (ph) became -- changed his name to Ramsey Yussef and became a terrorist or whether there had been some kind of theft of his identity. For Clarke to say something like that is like the 13th chime of the clock. Not only is it bizarre in and of itself, it calls into question, as far as I'm concerned, everything from the same source.

DOBBS: Jim Woolsey, this commission working hard, diligently a great deal of time being spent. What in your estimation will be the productive positive result from this commission's findings?

WOOLSEY: I think they need to go back and question everyone's assumptions back to the early and mid 90s about al Qaeda, and governments. And look hard at whether their objectively, whether there were any ties between al Qaeda and Iraq, between al Qaeda and Iran. There are a number of things al Qaeda did that I think it's going to be difficult in time for people to sustain saying they did completely alone and unhelped by anyone who was, you know, had some fake passports, whatever. Look, Lou, it doesn't mean that any organization were under the command of the others.

I look on them as sort of like Mafia families. They hate each other, they kill each other from time to time. They insult each other but they are capable of cooperating here and there. And the people like Clarke who have been saying they never work together under any circumstances I think those assumptions need to be questioned vigorously by this commission and others.

DOBBS: You are the professional. When you talk about questioning assumptions, I think there's sort of a reflex from most of us mere civilians we hope our intelligence experts are constantly challenging assumptions and assessing a word straightforwardly. Does it concern you and we've only got a few seconds but I would like to know. We're spending an inordinate amount of time looking in a rearview mirror rather than forward. Does that concern you?

WOOLSEY: To some extent. We need to get the past as clear as we can in order to understand the future. The assumptions a lot of people made is those organizations never touched base with one another, never cooperated on anything. I think maybe the major misleading thing that was done to all of us by the intelligence agencies from the mid 90s on and by people like Clarke.

DOBBS: Jim Woolsey, thank you very much for being here.

WOOLSEY: Good to be with you.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cia; clarke; iraq; jameswoolsey; prewarintelligence; richardclarke; ubl; woolsey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
In hearings today before the 9/11 Commission, former Navy Secretary John Lehman asked Madeline Albright if she was aware Yassin (93 WTC Terrorist) or any of the other terrorists found in Baghdad were given sanctuary in Iraq and SHE SAID SHE DID NOT KNOW!
1 posted on 03/23/2004 8:52:50 PM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mia T
fyi
2 posted on 03/23/2004 8:53:26 PM PST by jla (http://hillarytalks.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
Perhaps no one wanted to be the messenger?
3 posted on 03/23/2004 8:58:21 PM PST by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
For Clarke to say something like that is like the 13th chime of the clock. Not only is it bizarre in and of itself, it calls into question, as far as I'm concerned, everything from the same source.

Bizarre? Nothing is as bizarre as Clarke's statement that he thought Condi Rice had never heard of Al Qaeda. And that he could tell this by the expression on her face.

4 posted on 03/23/2004 8:58:24 PM PST by Shermy (Stirring the pot...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
I've got good money that says tomorrow's going to be worth watching: I think two and a half hours of Clarke is going to be quite entertaining; he may just go nuts on live TV.
5 posted on 03/23/2004 9:01:24 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
I read the "expression on her face" in two ways:

1) Condi thinks to herself ... "xyz was right, this guy really is a complete and total idiot. I've got to demote him ASAP!"

2) Condi retains her pose and grace as her nose wrinkles slightly as she slowly draws close some new breath, "this rude & apparently psychotic man has extremely bad breath and body odors! I'm going to x him ASAP!"

6 posted on 03/23/2004 9:01:29 PM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
Albright also said on a MTP show a few years ago that she did not know that the US was buying oil from the Iraqis under the Oil for Food program.
7 posted on 03/23/2004 9:04:12 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.; Shermy
In his testimony today, Wolowitz quoted from Clarke's book that Clarke said that he linked the first bombing of the WTC to Iraq because of the attempted assassination of former President Bush.

The only problem is that the assassination attempt took place two months after the first WTC bombing. (Wolowitz kind of snickered when he said it.)

8 posted on 03/23/2004 9:05:05 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
That's how good Clarke is! He's a legend in his own mind. If he's not right ... well ... he's psychic!
9 posted on 03/23/2004 9:06:38 PM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kabar
Abright?

"...The problem is not combating Al Qaeda's inherent appeal, for it has none. The problem is changing the fact that major components of American foreign policy are either opposed or misunderstood by much of the world...."

Delusional denial of jihadi appeal coupled with ritualistic anti-american self-flagellation.

Her ignorant quotes will be recited as "proof" from Paris to Riyadh.

10 posted on 03/23/2004 9:07:51 PM PST by Shermy (Stirring the pot...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
AQ ping
11 posted on 03/23/2004 9:07:51 PM PST by Pan_Yans Wife (Much of your pain is self-chosen. --- Kahlil Gibran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar; MizSterious
Really? LOL.
12 posted on 03/23/2004 9:08:03 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
I'm beginning to get the impression that Clark thought he should have had Condi Rice's job
13 posted on 03/23/2004 9:08:09 PM PST by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Steven W.; vbmoneyspender
Act rational or sell more books? Act rational or sell more books?

A dilemma Clarke is wrestling with tonight, among other dreams of Condi's face glaring at him, judging him, filling him with dread and confusion.

Poor guy...

14 posted on 03/23/2004 9:14:45 PM PST by Shermy (Stirring the pot...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Clarke will also be Larry King's guest tomorrow night.

Clarke is being given plenty of TV time to spew his lies.

15 posted on 03/23/2004 9:16:50 PM PST by BlueAngel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

No! Stay back! Nooooo!
16 posted on 03/23/2004 9:18:30 PM PST by Shermy (Stirring the pot...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BlueAngel
Busy as a little bee, isn't he?
17 posted on 03/23/2004 9:22:28 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
In a way clarke seems to be sort of on a par with Larry King. More gas than ass.
18 posted on 03/23/2004 9:23:44 PM PST by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Oh wow... wish I had seen/heard that! lol
19 posted on 03/23/2004 9:23:58 PM PST by nutmeg (Why vote for Bush? Imagine Commander in Chief John Fin al-Qerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
Well, it's rerunning right now........but it's at the very end. Just after Rumsfeld.
20 posted on 03/23/2004 9:27:11 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson