The United States of North America?
What the hell...
Posted on 05/19/2006 6:56:03 AM PDT by Dark Skies
President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.
Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA to include Canada, setting the stage for North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.
President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.
The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled "Building a North American Community" published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration's actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union:
At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts.
What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is contained in a "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" little noticed when President Bush and President Fox created it in March 2005:
In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments. President Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a common commitment "to markets and democracy, freedom and trade, and mutual prosperity and security." The policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized.
To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.
The perspective of the CFR report allows us to see President Bush's speech to the nation as nothing more than public relations posturing and window dressing. No wonder President Vincente Fox called President Bush in a panic after the speech. How could the President go back on his word to Mexico by actually securing our border? Not to worry, President Bush reassured President Fox. The National Guard on the border were only temporary, meant to last only as long until the public forgets about the issue, as has always been the case in the past.
The North American Union plan, which Vincente Fox has every reason to presume President Bush is still following, calls for the only border to be around the North American Union -- not between any of these countries. Or, as the CFR report stated:
The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments’ physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening of travelers from third countries at their first point of entry into North America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America.
Discovering connections like this between the CFR recommendations and Bush administration policy gives credence to the argument that President Bush favors amnesty and open borders, as he originally said. Moreover, President Bush most likely continues to consider groups such as the Minuteman Project to be "vigilantes," as he has also said in response to a reporter's question during the March 2005 meeting with President Fox.
Why doesn’t President Bush just tell the truth? His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union. The administration has no intent to secure the border, or to enforce rigorously existing immigration laws. Securing our border with Mexico is evidently one of the jobs President Bush just won't do. If a fence is going to be built on our border with Mexico, evidently the Minuteman Project is going to have to build the fence themselves. Will President Bush protect America's sovereignty, or is this too a job the Minuteman Project will have to do for him?
FYI ping:
http://www.thenewamerican.com/artman/publish/article_3746.shtml
United States of North America
by Steven Yates
May 1, 2006
Elitists in the United States, Mexico, and Canada are plotting to merge these three nations into a single regional government similar to the European Union.
In 1787, 13 former British colonies that had briefly been independent states agreed to create a free trade zone inside a shared security perimeter. People, goods, and capital would move freely throughout that region, ignoring previously existing borders. The union thus created was christened the United States of America.
In the early years of the 21st century, elites in three nations — the United States, Canada, and Mexico — are busy creating a new political configuration called the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP). It would broaden and deepen the relationship between the three nations created in 1994 through the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in dramatic ways.
The new architecture would include a free trade zone protected by a common security perimeter, within which goods, people, and capital would move freely across what had once been firmly established international borders.
First of all, it would require that U.S. citizens effectively surrender their citizenship in the independent constitutional republic founded in 1787. Unlike the USA, which was an organic outgrowth of a political system rooted in Anglo-Saxon laws, customs, traditions, and language, the political entity created through the SPP — in effect, the United States of North America (USNA) — would be a forced three-way marriage of wildly incompatible cultures and political systems.
[snip]
RE: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1634942/posts?page=49#49
One of these URLs is now linked to an executable file.
Maybe remove it so no one's computer gets zapped.
yeppers!
The United States of North America.
That's what this "initial" step is all about.
Selling out America, and making it the "good ole US of NA"
Time to vote out every incumbent in the country. The GOP is the same as the RATS.
I couldn't agree with you more. This is treason to go ahead with a plan to destroy our country's sovereignty in order to make money for the globalists who seem to have overtaken our government.
This article came from Human Events -- hardly as library of radical lib articles. I believe every word of it. All you have to do is look at Bush's record -- no border enforcement, no immigration enforcement, not wanting to make English our official language, outsourcing of jobs, insourcing of cheap labor, Mexican colonies throughout the U.S. This agreement Bush made behind our backs is NAFTA on steroids. It is ALREADY happening. It's no conspiracy.
Over the past few days I've seen the term "Conspiracy Theory" being bounced from post to post on a few threads, with no clear explanation from anyone.
Given all the information presented, are we now somehow suppose to not believe that the "New World Order," "Bohemian Grovers," "Tri lateral Commission," "Council On Foreign Relations" (CFR), the mythical "Bilderbergers," simplified down to one word, "Globalization" doesn't exist? I'm a reasonable person, please enlighten me?
Yes. Move along; nothing to see here. You should know that government is your best friend, better than your mommy. Don't question their behavior or anything they are doing. It really is not some nefarious dealings behind the scenes.
I posted the article because I thought it would generate a lot of chatter...but I don't believe its premise.
Strength isn't land mass or even population.
Strength is character and faith and dignity. And as regards faith...that is faith in constructive affection. Faith in love and truth.
Faith in God!
That's your faith and mine.
Those who are doing these things have put their faith in something else altogether.
This is another endearing trait of the Party-Above-Principle Big Tent GOP/RNC loyalists, i.e., none of this can possibly be true because that would mean we are being sold out by our own government, and by the GOP leadership, headed by good ol' guess who?
You got that right!
Thanks for the pings, this is frightening stuff.
That it is.
Deny at your own peril. Unless Bush changes direction. We are being dared to cross a line.
Bump!
Actually, I already do shave my noggin. I was always a fan of Daddy Warbucks.
I told my nieces I was aiming for Mr. Clean...and they screamed in unison..."Uncle Fester!"
Those youtes of today...a real mystery!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.