Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gonzales 'not clear' if kin legal
NY Daily News ^ | 19 May 2006

Posted on 05/18/2006 5:14:48 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher

WASHINGTON - Attorney General Alberto Gonzales admitted yesterday it's "just not clear" if his Mexican-immigrant grandparents settled in the U.S. legally.

The nation's top cop - who is the first Hispanic attorney general - has become a pointman for the White House on divisive immigration reforms President Bush is pushing.

"Three of my grandparents were born in Mexico. They came to Texas," Gonzales told CNN.

Pressed by Wolf Blitzer, Gonzales conceded he didn't know if they sneaked across the border like millions of illegals at issue in the current debate.

"It's unclear. It's unclear," Gonzales said. "And I've looked at this issue, I've talked to my parents about it, and it's just not clear."

Gonzales has often cited his grandparents' Mexican heritage and his dirt-poor upbringing in Texas in a big family headed by his migrant worker parents.

"My grandparents were Mexican immigrants. I remember visiting them as a very young boy - there was no telephone in their house, no television, no running hot water," Gonzales said during a naturalization ceremony for new citizens in December.

Gonzales is the latest in a series of Washington politicians to talk about their immigrant heritage.

Sen. Pete Domenici (R-N.M.) recently recalled how his illegal Italian-immigrant mother was arrested by the feds in 1943.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: albertogonzales; family; unclear
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last
To: Heyworth

Let me guess...the Ninth Circus?


21 posted on 05/18/2006 5:36:34 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Gonzales should be asked if his grandparents had social security numbers. If he knows when and where they died he could just visit the Social Security Admistration office in DC and find out. He can get a copy of his grandparents original social security applications for $27.00 each. He could also visit the National Archives and determine if his grandparents applied for citizenship. He could also conduct a search to see if his grandparents came to the USA between 1942-1964 under the Bracero program.


22 posted on 05/18/2006 5:36:45 PM PDT by gpapa (Boost FR Traffic! Make FR your home page!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
I don't believe he doesn't know. I don't care how his grandparents got here but I just don't believe he doesn't know.

Families have stories about such things.

23 posted on 05/18/2006 5:38:37 PM PDT by isrul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
Can someone tell me at any time has the Mexican Government ever been on the side of America?

When Taco Bell began using a little talking chihuahua?
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
24 posted on 05/18/2006 5:39:34 PM PDT by mkjessup (The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ikka
And he would prefer that it remain unclear.

Yep. But you can be sure that some enterprising young reporters will be digging into this, and I bet we'll know the whole story soon.

25 posted on 05/18/2006 5:39:56 PM PDT by IndyTiger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Leave it to CNN miss the important stuff completely and instead focus on completely irrelevent fluff.


26 posted on 05/18/2006 5:40:32 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeremiah

Jeremiah,
I think you are confusing the economy with the government. Fortunately, the former is much larger than the latter. As you said, a vast majority of Americans receive more government services than they pay in taxes. This is also true of illegal immigrants. But this says nothing about whether they are contributing more to the economy than they are getting.


27 posted on 05/18/2006 5:41:03 PM PDT by TavoNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

LOL....geez.


28 posted on 05/18/2006 5:41:30 PM PDT by wardaddy (Are you a Coyote Republican or Un Hombre Verdad?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Gonzales and wife (his second) at swearing-in with Justice O'Connor.

Alberto R. Gonzales (born August 4, 1955) is the 80th and current Attorney General of the United States, becoming the first Hispanic to serve in the position. He formerly served under U.S. President George W. Bush as White House Counsel, and prior to that had been appointed by Bush to the Texas Supreme Court.

Personal background

Gonzales was born in San Antonio, Texas and raised in Houston. He was the second of eight children born to Pablo and Maria Gonzales. His father, who died in 1982, was a construction worker. Both his parents were children of immigrants from Mexico with less than a high-school education themselves; in the midst of a national debate in the US about immigration from Mexico, Gonzales told Wolf Blitzer on CNN that no immigration documentation exists for three of his grandparents and they may have entered and resided in the United States illegally. An honors student at MacArthur High School in Houston, Gonzales enlisted in the United States Air Force in 1973, serving for two years at Fort Yukon, Alaska before being accepted to the United States Air Force Academy in 1975. In 1977, he transferred to Rice University, where he was a member of Lovett College and earned a degree in political science in 1979; he then earned a Juris Doctor (J.D) degree from Harvard Law School in 1982. He was the only one of his siblings to finish college. He has been married twice: he and his first wife, Diane Clemens, divorced in 1985; he and his second wife, Rebecca Turner Gonzales, have three sons.

Despite keeping a low profile about his religious affiliation, Gonzales has described himself as a Catholic.

Texas career

Gonzales was an attorney in private practice from 1982 until 1994 with the Houston law firm Vinson and Elkins, where he became a partner. In 1994, he was named general counsel to then-Texas Governor George W. Bush, rising to become Texas Secretary of State in 1997 and finally to be named to the Texas Supreme Court in 1999, both appointments made by Governor Bush.

Outside of his political and legal career, Gonzales was active in the community. He was a board director of the United Way of the Texas Gulf Coast from 1993 to 1994, and President of Leadership Houston during this same period. In 1994, Gonzales served as Chair of the Commission for District Decentralization of the Houston Independent School District, and as a member of the Committee on Undergraduate Admissions for Rice University. He was chosen as one of Five Outstanding Young Texans by the Texas Jaycees in 1994. He was a member of delegations sent by the American Council of Young Political Leaders to Mexico in 1996 and to the People's Republic of China in 1995. He received the Presidential Citation from the State Bar of Texas in 1997 for his dedication to addressing basic legal needs of the indigent. In 1999, he was named Latino Lawyer of the Year by the Hispanic National Bar Association.

As counsel to Governor Bush, Gonzales helped Bush be excused from jury duty when he was called in a 1996 Travis County drunk driving case. The case led to controversy during Bush's 2000 presidential campaign because Bush's answers to the potential juror questionnaire did not disclose Bush's own 1976 misdemeanor drunk driving conviction.[1] Gonzales' formal request for Bush to be excused from jury duty hinged upon the fact that, as Governor of Texas, he might be called upon to pardon the accused in the case. Upon learning of the 1976 conviction, the prosecutor in the 1996 case (a Democrat) felt he had been "directly deceived". The defense attorney in the case called Gonzales' arguments "laughable".[2].

As Governor Bush's counsel in Texas, Gonzales also reviewed all clemency requests. A 2003 article in The Atlantic Monthly asserts that Gonzales gave insufficient counsel, failed to take into consideration a wide array of factors, and actively worked against clemency in a number of borderline cases. (The state of Texas executed more prisoners during Gonzales' term, and still has more prisoners on death row, than any other state.)[3] [4]

Legal problems

Gonzales has been accused of having connections with the former energy company Enron, which collapsed amid financial scandals in 2002; the law firm Gonzales worked for in Texas, Vinson and Elkins, represented Enron, and the company gave Gonzales $6,500 in campaign contributions for his 2000 run for re-election to the Texas Supreme Court, in which he defeated Libertarian Lance Smith with 81% of the popular vote.

Those and other incidents have led many to questions Gonzales' integrity and his perception of justice. Many others, however, regard these accusations as politically motivated attacks.

When Bush was sworn in as President of the United States in 2001, he appointed Gonzales White House Counsel. In this position, Gonzales has been already party to controversial legal matters involving the Bush administration. As a result, he has become a lightning rod for criticism of the administration's actions in these affairs.

It has come forward that during his January 2005 Attorney General Senate confirmation hearings, Gonzales apparently lied to Congress. Senator Russ Feingold, in attempting to determine where Gonzales believed the president's authority ends, asked whether the president could act in contravention of existing criminal laws and spy on U.S. citizens without a warrant. Gonzales avoided answering the question by claiming that warrantless eavesdropping was a "hypothetical situation" and thus impossible to answer. He went on to add that it was "not the policy or the agenda of this president" to authorize actions that conflict with existing law. These statements were later proven false, when on February 6, 2006, he testified before Congress to his knowledge of the U.S. domestic spying program while he was White House Counsel.

Gonzales has avoided further investigation surrounding his testimony, partly because Republican Senator Arlen Specter refused to swear in Gonzales, but also because confirmation hearings testimony was ruled as off limits as a precondition to questioning Gonzales.

SOURCE http://72.14.207.104/search?q=cache:GVzSoxYTjPAJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberto_Gonzales+Alberto+Gonzales+(born)&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1

29 posted on 05/18/2006 5:42:42 PM PDT by Liz (We have room for but one flag, the American flag." —Theodore Roosevelt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

My grandma's second husband chased Villa in Mexico with Blackjack.

Was he in Mexico illegally?


30 posted on 05/18/2006 5:42:42 PM PDT by wardaddy (Are you a Coyote Republican or Un Hombre Verdad?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
Can someone tell me at any time has the Mexican Government ever been on the side of America?

OK, I'll try this one.
When President Jimmy Carter gave away the Panama Canal.

31 posted on 05/18/2006 5:42:43 PM PDT by vox_freedom (Fear no evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ikka

Let the rats chew on that cheese a little while.


32 posted on 05/18/2006 5:43:27 PM PDT by chemicalman (Many have skeletons in their closets. In New Orleans, we have skeletons in our attics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

they pulled it ...said it was racist

I thought it was great....like that beer drinking bulldog


33 posted on 05/18/2006 5:43:47 PM PDT by wardaddy (Are you a Coyote Republican or Un Hombre Verdad?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Let me guess...the Ninth Circus?

Damn, you're good. Was it the decision itself, or the fact that it's California that tipped you off?

34 posted on 05/18/2006 5:44:15 PM PDT by Heyworth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

"It's unclear. It's unclear," "And I've looked at this issue, I've talked to my parents about it, and it's just not clear."

It appears the Attorney General is unclear.


35 posted on 05/18/2006 5:44:16 PM PDT by SeaBiscuit (God Bless America and All who protect and preserve this Great Nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
That is funny because the Chihuahua was bred to be a walking larder not as a dog!

Do you remember Les Nessman on WKRP pronounce it Chi who a who a?
36 posted on 05/18/2006 5:46:18 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator
So what? There was quite a lot of backslapping on this board when two Clinton appointees were (rightfully) rejected because the employed illegal aliens.

When the same thing happened to Linda Chavez, there was less backslapping but there were no sour grapes either.

But, at least to you it seems, it's okay to have a possible anchor baby as United States Attorney General? Are you out of your mind?

37 posted on 05/18/2006 5:49:44 PM PDT by Doohickey (Democrats are nothing without a constituency of victims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jeremiah
I have seen studies that say that a vast majority of citizens, take more money from the govt, than they pay in taxes.

      Say What?  Do you hava a reference for these studies?

38 posted on 05/18/2006 5:50:00 PM PDT by Celtman (It's never right to do wrong to do right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

bump


39 posted on 05/18/2006 5:50:01 PM PDT by AnimalLover ( ((Are there special rules and regulations for the big guys?)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

40 posted on 05/18/2006 5:51:25 PM PDT by hispanarepublicana (Don't fall for the soft bigotry of assuming all Hispanics are pro-amnesty. www.dontspeakforme.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson