Skip to comments.
Gonzales 'not clear' if kin legal
NY Daily News ^
| 19 May 2006
Posted on 05/18/2006 5:14:48 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-110 next last
THIS could be the story behind the story...
To: Aussie Dasher
Can you hold the thread up a moment...I just put the popcorn in the microwave.
To: Aussie Dasher
It could be this is a completely irrelevant tin foil hate nut job post instead Of the two I suspect MY analysis is closer to the truth.
3
posted on
05/18/2006 5:16:51 PM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(Conservative, The simple fact about DC is this . "There is more work to do"...)
To: Aussie Dasher
To: CWOJackson
LOL!!! Put some in for me!
5
posted on
05/18/2006 5:17:43 PM PDT
by
Aussie Dasher
(The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
To: Aussie Dasher
And he would prefer that it remain unclear.
6
posted on
05/18/2006 5:20:13 PM PDT
by
ikka
Comment #7 Removed by Moderator
To: Aussie Dasher
Soon, illegal immigration will become virtuous. Orwell was only off by 20 years.
8
posted on
05/18/2006 5:21:36 PM PDT
by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(Memo to GOP: Don't ask me for any more money until you secure our Southern border.)
To: Aussie Dasher
Well this is no fun.
I'll throw some chum in the water: "Gonzales further denied claims by Wold Blitzer that his grandparents had actually been smuggled across the border by President Bush's grandfather to work in his kitchen."
To: Aussie Dasher
Can someone tell me at any time has the Mexican Government ever been on the side of America?
10
posted on
05/18/2006 5:23:17 PM PDT
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
To: CWOJackson
11
posted on
05/18/2006 5:23:22 PM PDT
by
Tribune7
To: CWOJackson
hehe...you just want a chance to munch the popcorn before it goes cold.
If the Libs had any inkling of this, they would have screamed it at his confirmation hearings I bet...oh wait. Nope, they wouldn't.
To: Aussie Dasher
You know this story is probally very complicated for several reasons. Before , I believe 1920 I think the immigration policies were a tad different. People sort of just showed up. So to say if his all Grandparents showed up legally might be sort of a tough call depending when they arrived. I suspect in a few cases that might be why its not "clear"
13
posted on
05/18/2006 5:24:03 PM PDT
by
catholicfreeper
(Proud supporter of Pres. Bush and the Gop-- with no caveats, qualifiers, or bitc*en)
To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
This explains the Attorney General's position on Row v. Wade.
14
posted on
05/18/2006 5:25:03 PM PDT
by
David Allen
(the presumption of innocence - what a concept!)
To: CWOJackson
I would not be bothered at all by those sneaking in to make a living, if they were disqualified from medical, welfare and driving priveleges. We now live in a socialist state, and the cost to keep illegals taken care of is too much to bear. I have seen studies that say that a vast majority of citizens, take more money from the govt, than they pay in taxes. Telling people that illegals put more into the economy than they take out is therefore a lie.
15
posted on
05/18/2006 5:26:17 PM PDT
by
jeremiah
(How much did we get for that rope?)
To: CWOJackson
I wonder if their "Illegal" immigrant ancestors came in Waving a Mexican and an Italian Flag ???????
16
posted on
05/18/2006 5:27:08 PM PDT
by
tsali
To: jeremiah
"I would not be bothered at all by those sneaking in to make a living, if they were disqualified from medical, welfare and driving priveleges."
Therein lies just as big a problem as the border...and that problem is mostly driven by the states. I see some folks from California complaining about the open border but NOT outraged that their counties and state literally protect illegal immmigrants and provide them handsome benefits.
To: ikka
Thing is, depends on when his grandparents crossed into the US whether or not they were illegal. It's conceivable they came in the very earliest part of the 20th Century, before the type of immigration laws with which we are familiar were enacted. Most immigration laws were previously focused on how long it took to become a citizen, not only mere residency.
In 1921 the first quota law was enacted.
18
posted on
05/18/2006 5:32:43 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
(-)
To: CWOJackson
I see some folks from California complaining about the open border but NOT outraged that their counties and state literally protect illegal immmigrants and provide them handsome benefits.But when we tried to cut them off from those benefits a few years back, we were slapped down by the federal courts.
19
posted on
05/18/2006 5:33:54 PM PDT
by
Heyworth
To: Aussie Dasher
It matters not a whit at this point if Gonzalez' parents swam the Rio Grande, came over on the Mayflower or were delivered here by alien spaceship. The Attorney General has an obligation to enforce the laws equally and without bias.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-110 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson