To: KC_Conspirator
So what? There was quite a lot of backslapping on this board when two Clinton appointees were (rightfully) rejected because the
employed illegal aliens.
When the same thing happened to Linda Chavez, there was less backslapping but there were no sour grapes either.
But, at least to you it seems, it's okay to have a possible anchor baby as United States Attorney General? Are you out of your mind?
37 posted on
05/18/2006 5:49:44 PM PDT by
Doohickey
(Democrats are nothing without a constituency of victims.)
To: Doohickey
"But, at least to you it seems, it's okay to have a possible anchor baby as United States Attorney General? Are you out of your mind?
Good grief now are people going to start talking about Anchor Grandbabies.
51 posted on
05/18/2006 6:24:34 PM PDT by
catholicfreeper
(Proud supporter of Pres. Bush and the Gop-- with no caveats, qualifiers, or bitc*en)
To: Doohickey
Okay, how is Gonzalez supposed to be punished for the possible legalities of his parents?
That is unless Gonzalez hired his parents to clean his house latelyt.
Apples and oranges.
To: Doohickey
Even if his grandparents were illegal, Gonzalez is not an anchor baby. Perhaps his parents were, but he is just a regular old citizen.
86 posted on
05/18/2006 7:58:50 PM PDT by
Miss Marple
(Lord, please look after Mozart Lover's and Jemian's sons and keep them strong.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson