Skip to comments.
Republicans Vote Against “Secure-First” Approach.
May/16/05
| Screw Boll
Posted on 05/16/2006 11:38:57 AM PDT by screw boll
A republican senator proposed a bill that will prohibit the granting of legal status, or adjustment of current status, to any individual who enters or entered the United States in violation of Federal law unless the border security measures are put up front. I9n other words: secure the borders first! The bill failed passage in a 55-40 vote. The Republicans that voted against this measure along side 36 Democrats and one Independent are as follows: Bennett (UT) Brownback (R-KS), Chafee (RI), Coleman (MN), Collins (ME), Craig (ID), DeWine (OH), Graham (SC), Hagel (NE), Lugar (IN), Martinez (FL), Murkowski (AK), Shelby (AL), Snow (ME),Specter (PA), Stevens (AK), Voinovich (OH), Warner (VA)
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: aliens; gop; johnwarner; senatevote
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-148 next last
To: Dominic Harr
41
posted on
05/16/2006 11:55:36 AM PDT
by
tomahawk
(Proud to be an enemy of Islam)
To: MNJohnnie
This is the group I find most interesting:
Voting for Strict Border Enforcement
Grouped By Vote Position YEAs --- Byrd (D-WV); Conrad (D-ND); Dorgan (D-ND); Landrieu (D-LA); Nelson (D-NE); Stabenow (D-MI); Wyden (D-OR)
Stabenow herself immigrated from Canada.
42
posted on
05/16/2006 11:56:23 AM PDT
by
Vicomte13
(La nuit tombe.)
To: Soul Seeker
"Those Republicans and Democrats that voted against the enforcement first amendment endorse Bush's approach. Wrap your mind around that reality."
I know that. But we Conservatives do not support Bush's approach.
To: Peach
That poll oversampled Republicans by about 2-1 and addressed their support of Bush's immigration policy, not his overall policies.
44
posted on
05/16/2006 11:56:56 AM PDT
by
tomahawk
(Proud to be an enemy of Islam)
To: MNJohnnie
45
posted on
05/16/2006 11:57:03 AM PDT
by
mnehring
(Those who advocate, and act to promote, victory by Democrats are not conservatives!)
To: screw boll
I have not read the bill but....
This seems as striking as the Duncan Hunter bill that put the dems on the spot about removing troops from Iraq.
Again it shows that the Senate is where the REAL problem is.
Even though I disagree with W in part about this issue he did the right thing sending the ball to Congress' side of the net. Seems they missed the ball entirely with this vote.
Simply amazing.
The senate really isn't listening to the people.
To: screw boll
As I've said many times, our Republican majority in the Senate is an illusion. Until 7 to 10 of these fakes get tossed in favor of conservatives, we'll get nothing done on this issue, and little done on the other agenda items.
47
posted on
05/16/2006 11:58:20 AM PDT
by
Antoninus
(I will not vote for a liberal, regardless of party. Let's make the RINO extinct.)
To: kerryusama04
You and me both, pal.
Did you see the article written last week by Fred Barnes about our Governor? Good stuff...
Missouri Pubbies Rock!
48
posted on
05/16/2006 11:58:56 AM PDT
by
liberty_lvr
(Those who stand for nothing fall for anything.)
To: mnehrling
I was thikning along those lines also. Maybe we need a three liner like the one Duncan hunter put forth about Iraq troop withdrawel??
To: Peach
Wow, Peach. Since when do we trust CNN Polls? LOL.
sw
50
posted on
05/16/2006 11:59:39 AM PDT
by
spectre
(Spectre's wife ("He who tries to please all, pleases none)
To: mnehrling
You wrote: Maybe this was the problem. It was added as an amendment to a non-immigration bill."
So, do you think that the Republicans who voted in favor of this bill or not aware of this fact? For all I know, democrats will hold up bills only to stop one amendment.
To: screw boll
We certainly knew that some of them were RINOs but now we have drawn out the unknowns.
52
posted on
05/16/2006 12:01:24 PM PDT
by
zerosix
(Native Sunflower)
To: MNJohnnie
All well and good except for the fact that we actually CONTROL THE DAMN SENATE which means that the measure should have passed and NONE of the Republicans should have voted against it.
53
posted on
05/16/2006 12:01:57 PM PDT
by
Bikers4Bush
(Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
To: tomahawk
CNN oversampled Republicans? I seriously doubt that. It would be the first time in their history they've over done it.
54
posted on
05/16/2006 12:02:08 PM PDT
by
Peach
(DICC's - doing the work for the DNC)
To: Peach
Thank you for the poll. I wonder if Bush's overall ratings will sky rocket as a result of this speech. Do not hold your breath.
To: screw boll
we cannot take them all down at once.......let's pick the biggest rino, and get rid of that one first, and be very public about the intent.......the rest will fall in line
56
posted on
05/16/2006 12:02:29 PM PDT
by
joe fonebone
(Time to bring back tar and feathering.)
To: screw boll
I hope the House gives 'em "what fer" when it comes time. The last hope seems to be with them.
To: BlueStateDepression
58
posted on
05/16/2006 12:03:08 PM PDT
by
mnehring
(Those who advocate, and act to promote, victory by Democrats are not conservatives!)
To: goalinestan
"Seriously, is there anyone who can rationally explain why these R's voted like this?" Looks like pretty much the "standard bunch of RINOS".
59
posted on
05/16/2006 12:04:15 PM PDT
by
Wonder Warthog
(The Hog of Steel-NRA)
To: goalinestan
Seriously, is there anyone who can rationally explain why these R's voted like this?They agree with the President and disagree with you? Just a guess.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-148 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson