Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Light's Most Exotic Trick Yet: So Fast it Goes ... Backwards?
University of Rochester ^ | 11 May 2006 | Staff (press release)

Posted on 05/12/2006 7:42:17 AM PDT by PatrickHenry

In the past few years, scientists have found ways to make light go both faster and slower than its usual speed limit, but now researchers at the University of Rochester have published a paper today in Science on how they've gone one step further: pushing light into reverse. As if to defy common sense, the backward-moving pulse of light travels faster than light.

Confused? You're not alone.

"I've had some of the world's experts scratching their heads over this one," says Robert Boyd, the M. Parker Givens Professor of Optics at the University of Rochester. "Theory predicted that we could send light backwards, but nobody knew if the theory would hold up or even if it could be observed in laboratory conditions."

Boyd recently showed how he can slow down a pulse of light to slower than an airplane, or speed it up faster than its breakneck pace, using exotic techniques and materials. But he's now taken what was once just a mathematical oddity—negative speed—and shown it working in the real world.


Robert Boyd, professor of optics (PHOTO CREDIT: University of Rochester)

"It's weird stuff," says Boyd. "We sent a pulse through an optical fiber, and before its peak even entered the fiber, it was exiting the other end. Through experiments we were able to see that the pulse inside the fiber was actually moving backward, linking the input and output pulses."

So, wouldn't Einstein shake a finger at all these strange goings-on? After all, this seems to violate Einstein's sacred tenet that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light.

"Einstein said information can't travel faster than light, and in this case, as with all fast-light experiments, no information is truly moving faster than light," says Boyd. "The pulse of light is shaped like a hump with a peak and long leading and trailing edges. The leading edge carries with it all the information about the pulse and enters the fiber first. By the time the peak enters the fiber, the leading edge is already well ahead, exiting. From the information in that leading edge, the fiber essentially 'reconstructs' the pulse at the far end, sending one version out the fiber, and another backward toward the beginning of the fiber."

Boyd is already working on ways to see what will happen if he can design a pulse without a leading edge. Einstein says the entire faster-than-light and reverse-light phenomena will disappear. Boyd is eager to put Einstein to the test.

So How Does Light Go Backwards?

Boyd, along with Rochester graduate students George M. Gehring and Aaron Schweinsberg, and undergraduates Christopher Barsi of Manhattan College and Natalie Kostinski of the University of Michigan, sent a burst of laser light through an optical fiber that had been laced with the element erbium. As the pulse exited the laser, it was split into two. One pulse went into the erbium fiber and the second traveled along undisturbed as a reference. The peak of the pulse emerged from the other end of the fiber before the peak entered the front of the fiber, and well ahead of the peak of the reference pulse.

But to find out if the pulse was truly traveling backward within the fiber, Boyd and his students had to cut back the fiber every few inches and re-measure the pulse peaks when they exited each pared-back section of the fiber. By arranging that data and playing it back in a time sequence, Boyd was able to depict, for the first time, that the pulse of light was moving backward within the fiber.

To understand how light's speed can be manipulated, think of a funhouse mirror that makes you look fatter. As you first walk by the mirror, you look normal, but as you pass the curved portion in the center, your reflection stretches, with the far edge seeming to leap ahead of you (the reference walker) for a moment. In the same way, a pulse of light fired through special materials moves at normal speed until it hits the substance, where it is stretched out to reach and exit the material's other side [See "fast light" animation].

Conversely, if the funhouse mirror were the kind that made you look skinny, your reflection would appear to suddenly squish together, with the leading edge of your reflection slowing as you passed the curved section. Similarly, a light pulse can be made to contract and slow inside a material, exiting the other side much later than it naturally would [See "slow light" animation].

To visualize Boyd's reverse-traveling light pulse, replace the mirror with a big-screen TV and video camera. As you may have noticed when passing such a display in an electronics store window, as you walk past the camera, your on-screen image appears on the far side of the TV. It walks toward you, passes you in the middle, and continues moving in the opposite direction until it exits the other side of the screen.

A negative-speed pulse of light acts much the same way. As the pulse enters the material, a second pulse appears on the far end of the fiber and flows backward. The reversed pulse not only propagates backward, but it releases a forward pulse out the far end of the fiber. In this way, the pulse that enters the front of the fiber appears out the end almost instantly, apparently traveling faster than the regular speed of light. To use the TV analogy again—it's as if you walked by the shop window, saw your image stepping toward you from the opposite edge of the TV screen, and that TV image of you created a clone at that far edge, walking in the same direction as you, several paces ahead [See "backward light" animation].

"I know this all sounds weird, but this is the way the world works," says Boyd.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: endochronic; physics; thiotimoline
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: RightWhale

I believe it was actually oog the neanderthatl who postulated, no light, no cave panting, leading to Einsteins theory that information was limited by light.

And of course in the future some people will choose another way of controlling information using something called "The Dark Side" of the force, negating this theory.


21 posted on 05/12/2006 8:02:32 AM PDT by Waverunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: battlecry

I'm flabbergasted!
22 posted on 05/12/2006 8:03:00 AM PDT by Coop (Proud founding member of GCA - Gruntled Conservatives of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
" Good luck with that. A perfect square wave of frequency x consists of the fundamental sine wave x plus the sum of all odd harmonic sine waves of frequency x."

Well, sure, everybody knows that. But what if you send it through the Stargate two or three times first? ;-)

23 posted on 05/12/2006 8:04:17 AM PDT by Pablo64 ("Everything I say is fully substantiated by my own opinion.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Waverunner

Einstein said a lot of things, but 'information' isn't in the index to his tract 'The Meaning of Relativity'. He also said that if chose to leave his second wife no force on earth could stop him.


24 posted on 05/12/2006 8:06:33 AM PDT by RightWhale (Off touch and out of base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

"an optical fiber that had been laced with the element erbium"

So, if the fiber needed to be repaired or upgraded, that would be kinda like erban renewal?


25 posted on 05/12/2006 8:08:44 AM PDT by Clioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fungoking
If the girls in space dress like the ones on (Star Trek), sign me up!

Be careful of what you ask for on this forum. There are twisted people who (a) know how to use Photoshop, (b) have images of Helen Thomas on their computers, and (c) have waaay too much time on their hands.

26 posted on 05/12/2006 8:09:02 AM PDT by Fudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Bump.


27 posted on 05/12/2006 8:09:20 AM PDT by techcor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pablo64
Well, sure, everybody knows that. But what if you send it through the Stargate two or three times first? ;-)

Well, that'll stun your beeber, which is very series!

28 posted on 05/12/2006 8:10:34 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Really nice article, PH. Every time I see a new physics breakthrough I'm painfully reminded of how specialized fields in science have become, because, to be quite honest, I really don't truly understand much of the physics they're talking about at all.


29 posted on 05/12/2006 8:12:34 AM PDT by Quark2005 (Confidence follows from consilience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Wow, fascinating.


30 posted on 05/12/2006 8:14:18 AM PDT by TAdams8591
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

"As the pulse enters the material, a second pulse appears on the far end of the fiber and flows backward."


Sounds more like a reflection to me than a case of light "flowing backward." The only thing that seems odd about it when viewed in that way is the timing, i.e. that the second pulse appears immediately at the far end of the fiber, apparently just after the initial pulse enters the fiber.

So your first thought is that it can't be a reflection because the initial pulse has not yet gotten to the end of the fiber. However, they say that a portion of the light impulse is apparently flowing faster than its normal speed. I wonder if they just mean the normal speed thru the material, which might very well be less than the speed of light in a vaccuum. If so, then I'm not too suprised by the result. In fact, if that's the case, then it seems like they are making a mountain out of a mole hill.


31 posted on 05/12/2006 8:15:44 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

There's a difference betwixt group velocity and phase veolcity.


32 posted on 05/12/2006 8:23:52 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

I'm not a physicist, but this smells like BS to me.


33 posted on 05/12/2006 8:24:02 AM PDT by BadAndy ("Loud mouth internet Rambo")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coop
Whooooaaa....


34 posted on 05/12/2006 8:24:19 AM PDT by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

"Sdrawkcab tou gnimoc era stsop ym "
""sdrawkcab krow t'nseod rekcehclleps ruoY""

OAML


35 posted on 05/12/2006 8:27:07 AM PDT by BadAndy ("Loud mouth internet Rambo")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

How do they know it wasn't going backward in the first place?


36 posted on 05/12/2006 8:27:45 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
This short column talks about what appears to be a similar phenomenon and why it doesn't violate relativity.
37 posted on 05/12/2006 8:39:36 AM PDT by Quark2005 (Confidence follows from consilience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Light's Most Exotic Trick Yet: So Fast it Goes ... Backwards?

Haven't these guys ever heard of a mirror? Next they'll be telling us that men and women are different.

38 posted on 05/12/2006 8:43:44 AM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

It's all smoke and mirrors.


39 posted on 05/12/2006 8:49:27 AM PDT by subterfuge (Call me a Jingoist, I don't care...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

How does the leading edge of the wave of the pule of light contain the information on the whole wave? Is that not impossible by definition?


40 posted on 05/12/2006 8:55:08 AM PDT by Bones75
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson