Posted on 05/10/2006 7:15:13 PM PDT by Dems_R_Losers
Disaffection over spending and immigration have caused conservatives to take flight from President Bush and the Republican Congress at a rapid pace in recent weeks, sending Bush's approval ratings to record lows and presenting a new threat to the GOP's 12-year reign on Capitol Hill, according to White House officials, lawmakers and new polling data.
Bush and Congress have suffered a decline in support from almost every part of the conservative coalition over the past year, a trend that has accelerated with alarming implications for Bush's governing strategy.
The Gallup polling organization recorded a 13-percentage-point drop in Republican support for Bush in the past couple weeks. These usually reliable voters are telling pollsters and lawmakers they are fed up with what they see as out-of-control spending by Washington and an abandonment of core conservative principles more generally.
There are also significant pockets of conservatives turning on Bush and Congress over the their failure to tighten immigration laws, restrict gay marriage and to put an end to the Iraq war and the rash of political scandals, according to lawmakers and pollsters.
Bush won two presidential elections by pursuing a political and governing model that was predicated on winning and sustaining the loyal backing of social, economic and foreign policy conservatives. The strategy was based on the belief that conservatives, who are often more politically active than the general public, could be inspired to vote in larger numbers and would serve as a reliable foundation for his presidency. The theory, as explained by Bush strategists, is that the president would enjoy a floor below which his support would never fall.
It is now apparent that this floor has weakened dramatically and collapsed in places.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
I have no blinders on, EV. NONE.
Part of the SOLUTION...........not just griping about it on the Internet.
"Build a WALL or bye bye..."
Good luck getting there with the Democrats in charge and Hillary. I would have thought that 8 years of Bill Clinton would have taught you a lesson. Guess not.
A little perspective would go a long way with some of the posters on FR. Conservatives have finally accumulated enough power to be able to force a President to scrap his nomination of his good friend for Supreme Court justice, and you want to give that up by allowing the Democrats to win?
We have lower taxes, a better economy, a strong defense and a vigorous war on terrorism. We DO HAVE MUCH MORE TO DO, both on illegal immigration and reining in spending, but the answer is NOT to allow the Democrats to take charge.
I still am amazed that people here can take the "I'm staying home in November" attitude after having lived through 8 years of the Clinton presidency. The answer is to support more genuine conservatives and to root out RINOs, not allow the Democrats to GAIN power.
But I'm sorry, I didn't mean to let facts get in the way of a perfectly good temper tantrum.
Great, so enable the libs to take over so all illegals will automatically get amnesty. Smart move there.
So be it if all of the above happens??? Unreal. Btw, my post was simply stating the obvious. If A (sit out, vote 3rd party) then B (Rats win). It is not a threat, it is not a slogan, it is the obvious reality. There are many reasons to vote GOP, and you managed to list a number of them above, yet still suggest allowing a Rat victory by default.
GREAT post, Peach!
(The whole world's gone mad!)
I agree with you. It is time for action.
Just what to do is the question. Building a 3rd party takes money and dedication. I'm afraid before it was accomplished it would be infiltrated and hijacked.
I feel that internet solidarity can be a force that could reshape things.
Currently a ground swell of noise is about all we get from it. What is needed is a strategy to focus this emotion into an action plan.
I think targeting individuals who are currently in the game has the most potential. For starters identify incumbents from both parties that need to be removed. Identify candidates to be supported. Register independent and vote accordingly in the primaries of both parties.
Get the non-voters into the game. This has a lot of potential.
:)Easy Does It:)
We've been e-mailing and calling, but we can organize something bigger.
Have you ever been a political activist, tru? Have you ever actually WORKED for a conservative cause, or a strong conservative candidate? Have you agitated for change?
Well I have, and that's what I intend to do now.
Griping accomplishes nothing.
Are you with us, or against us? Are you a problem solver, or a girly man whiner?
Let's DO something.
Well, Bush never really campaigned as a conservative, for the most part. He was a "compassionate conservative".
It makes no sense to abandon "the GOP" because President Bush has done some things we don't like. He's not the guy up for reelection. What the GOP does nationally shouldn't really matter at all either when you're talking about Congressional races, because your vote should be based on the guys who are on the ballot in the particular races in which you are voting.
For the life of me, I can't figure out why how Arlen Spector or any other RINO votes should affect whether I'm willing to support a particular Republican in a race.
They've demonstrated that in spades.
You third party types will need the GOP.
I never said I was a "third party type". In fact, I said that I was going to vote Republican in November. But if it helps you to label people, go right ahead. One thing I'll never do, however, is "need" a political party.
Bye bye to the GOP means Hello to the DNC.
BS, I am hardcore and I aint leaving!
LOL! Thanks. :)
I scrolled down the rest of the thread, and I still saw no productive discussion about what can be DONE about this.
Ideas germinating in my head.......
"These people have NEVER been happy with Bush and the Republicans in Congress, and they never will be."
That is so NOT true. I have supported President Bush 100%, including Dubai. You have no idea how pissed off I am that he would betray me and the national security of my country by NOT securing the borders and rewarding illegal behavior with amnesty.
If you agree with his position, I'd like to know why? Or are you just going along because it's what Bush says and you support him no matter what.
Anyone threatening to leave is simply hardheaded. :)
Amen....... and media is full of bologna
"Build a WALL or bye bye..."
"Good luck getting there with the Democrats in charge and Hillary. I would have thought that 8 years of Bill Clinton would have taught you a lesson. Guess not."
It doesn't have to be all or nothing. I'm certainly not willing to throw out the baby with the bathwater just because Bush decided to take a leftist postion on this issue. There MUST be other Republicans who have their heads on straight and want closed borders and no earned amnesty.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.