Brian and the Judge, Monday, May 8, 2006

Fox Radio | 5.8/06 | Brian Kilmeade and Judge Andrew Napolitano

[Bahbah]

 

The New Brian and the Judge Show on Fox News Radio

---

You can find out more information about the line-up, stream the show, find local radio stations as well as other fun stuff off his website.

CLICK HERE and follow the "Listen Live" link to stream the show which runs from 9 AM est to noon and replays from noon to 3:00pm

A comprehensive list of streaming servers is available here.

XM Channel 168 also airs the show for satellite radio subscribers.

Also Fox Radio is back on Sirius channel 145

---

To call the show and talk to the boys dial: 1.866.408.7669

By the way, if you miss anything, the show is streamed again immediately after the three hours. Please feel free to add thread narrative about what is aired on the show as a group effort is helpful to get more of the content posted and is much appreciated by those reading the thread later.

"Woof" is used in broadcasting to say "stop," "that's enough" or to mark a specific point in time -- which is what is done in this case. "The show show starts in 3 minutes: WOOF!" Means in 3 minutes from-- NOW!

[HitmanLV]

Yep, I agree.

[RasterMaster]

Bill O'Reilly is only FOR whatever isn't seen as "fringy and extreme", takes no serious stand on anything. If he's the face of modern conservatives, I'd say they are all GIRLIE-MEN.

I couldn't give a rip what's considered "mainstream" by BOR or his knee-padders on this forum.

[HitmanLV]

You should consider what is mainstream and practical. Politics is at least partly about convincing people of your vision and moving the status quo in the direction you want it moved.

If your positions are impractical or alienating, you can't build consensus, and you won't ever be given the chance to get things done.

I'm a conservative, and not a girly man in any way, but I do realize there are some conservative principles that most Americans don't want. I see no justifiable reason to pursue an agenda that most people don't support. I figure if we cant convince most people that we are right, we don't deserve to advance on the issue.

I realize that many conservatives who are fixated on one issue may find that unpalatable, but they aren't even likely to gain a consensus among conservatives, let alone the general public. And in most cases, that's a good thing.

[RasterMaster]

Hey, Neville! That sounds more like a call for appeasment than anything I've heard so far...only thing you get with a "big tent" are circus freaks.

[HitmanLV]

Specifics, please? Where did I call for appeasement?

[RasterMaster]

First by admitting you like BOR! ROFL!

[HitmanLV]

I said I agree with him more often than not.

[RasterMaster]

Okay, "LAST WORD" freak.

[HitmanLV]

You still haven't answered my question with any specificity.

[RasterMaster]

Damn, you are dense! "NO" isn't specific enough for ya? I don't owe you anything, pal.

I don't watch guys who wear more makeup than any woman I know, but if you watch it - GREAT, enjoy!

[HitmanLV]

It has nothing to do with being dense. 'No' is not specific. I asked for specifics as to why you think you do, and all you do is reiterate your conclusion.

If that's cutting edge conservative thinking, you shouldn't be surprised as your positions are rejected.

[RasterMaster]

If consensus with traitors considered "cutting edge", I'm more than happy to be labeled as "extremist" and "intolerant".