Posted on 05/07/2006 9:53:58 AM PDT by Chi-townChief
A "blogstorm" is thundering across liberal Web sites. Many liberals are furious at the White House press corps for virtually ignoring Stephen Colbert's keynote speech at the press corp's own White House Correspondents' Dinner last Saturday. To non-liberals, this may seem like an isolated complaint. To liberals, it further justifies their belief that the media, particularly TV news, is a big stinking cabal of conservatives.
The truth is many in the media wrote about Bush's stand-up routine at the dinner as if they had just watched the coming of a comic genius, but they didn't report much on Colbert's funnier, harsher jokes. This may have been a case of the press corps following a standard motto: to the winner goes the spoils, and Bush got more laughs (out of copy written for him) than Colbert did.
How did Bush tickle reporters? He made fun of the fact that he can barely speak English (he is quite simply the worst communicator of all U.S. presidents), that our vice president is a heartless face-shooter, and that Bush is basically an idiot.
Ha ha, our "war president" knows he's a village idiot? To members of the White House press corps, that's some real funny stuff. To non-insiders, this looked like another example of good old boys and gals slapping each other on the back.
Colbert's routine was more remarkable for its unique and creative brazenness. He joked that Bush's presidency is like the Hindenburg; that Bush's wiretappers were monitoring this very event, and that the White House press corps, sitting in front of Colbert, gave Bush a free pass, scandal after scandal, until recently (when his polls numbers dropped).
How's this for a newsworthy lead? It was perhaps the first time in Bush's tenure that the president was forced to sit and listen to any American cite the litany of criminal and corruption allegations that have piled up against his administration. And mouth-tense Bush and first lady Laura Bush fled as soon as possible afterward.
From whom were they fleeing? A star comedian pretending to be a Fox News-like blowhard doing a sort of performance art that America hasn't witnessed nationally since the days of Andy Kaufman. Even if Colbert's bit had been reported as a train wreck, that would have sufficed. Instead, shocking lines like the following were barely covered by any traditional organ except industry magazine Editor & Publisher: "I stand by" Bush, Colbert cracked, "because he stands for things. Not only for things, he stands on things. Things like aircraft carriers and rubble, and recently flooded city squares. And that sends a strong message that no matter what happens to America, she will always rebound with the most powerfully staged photo ops in the world."
For TV reporters in particular to quote that gruesome line would be an agreement with Colbert, that they helped Bush mix politics with corruption from the ashes of 9/11 ("aircraft carriers and rubble"), and failed to see through Bush's politicization of the drowning of an American city after a hurricane ("recently flooded city squares").
But ignoring a newsworthy keynote speech -- at an event the press corps itself set up -- doesn't go unnoticed anymore. Internet stables for liberals, like the behemoth dailykos.com, began rumbling as soon as the correspondents' dinner was reported in the mainstream press, with scant word of Colbert's combustive address.
This is trouble for the media. It has been losing customers to bloggers and Web sites for years. This won't help. The media's implosion of silence could be one of the final reasons many liberals use to not turn on TV news. It's not like they feel a vested interest in the industry anyway, since it has been bought and parceled by conservatives.
There is Rupert Murdoch's Fox News, that Pravda of GOP propaganda and breeding ground for Bush appointees. There are the networks' Sunday news shows that give more face time to Republicans. There are cable news channels like MSNBC, where Republicans have programmed the shows and hired on-air Republicans and conservatives-lite, from Tucker Carlson to Joe Scarborough and Chris Matthews. Some TV watchdogs even chronicle these conservative media daily, backed up by transcripts and video clips from TV news shows, in the expansive Web site, MediaMatters.com.
On cable, only CNN still plays the journalism-school middle ground most of the time, questioning liberals, moderates and conservatives with equal skepticism and respect. Clearly, in terms of advertising revenue, CNN alone cares to attract the disposable income of American viewers of all political stripes.
To liberals, this must be somewhat puzzling, since the rest of the conservative media primarily sides with a president whose approval ratings stand at 32 percent, a whisker better than Nixon's before he resigned in disgrace.
Liberals find true solace on TV only in the fake news of Comedy Central's "The Colbert Report" and "The Daily Show," a place where Jon Stewart merely has to show actual clips of Bush speaking, or Condi Rice, or Cheney, or Donald Rumsfeld to elicit laughter at their hubris. If NBC News let in audiences during its broadcasts, those people might also laugh at the president.
But the TV news corps, the unthinking and unblinking herd of pack journalists, prefer to laugh with the president, and kiss many viewers goodbye.
mailto:delfman@suntimes.com
I didn't see it, and clearly Colbert has hurt his career by doing it, but for the record, I like Colbert's half hour -- Like Jon Stewart only much BETTER, AND, I always thought -- with a conservative edge.
He IS a practicing Roman Catholic, and makes no bones about it, but sees the problems that church has too -- "The Pope may be infallible," he said once, "But that does mean he never makes mistakes."
I think that's a funny line.
Colbert's humor works well in a controlled, Tele-Promptered, Canned Laughter enviornment.
Considering that nearly all of his "jokes" TANKED before a silent audience. I can kind of imagine the MSM's hesitation in airing Colbert's miserably un-funny diatribe.
Jack.
Hey, uh, Elfman? You're the frigging TELEVISION CRITIC. Leave your damned politics out of your column and just tell me what new shows suck, OK?
}:-)4
Wow, Doctor. I think you have hit the nail squarely on the head.
>>
. . . only CNN still plays the journalism-school middle ground . . .
<<
Ha. Ha ha ha.
Ha ha. Ha ha ha, ha.
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!
I agree. I have no trouble listening to Pres. Bush. As far as I am concerned, he speaks English articulately. This writer is just flapping his gums. I wish the moderator would put up a "Barf Alert" to these kind of liberal rampages.
>>
. . . a president whose approval ratings stand at 32 percent, a whisker better than Nixon's before he resigned in disgrace.
<<
And a full ten points better than Harry Truman, the democRAT who, based on bad intelligence, lied to the country and murdered hundreds of thousands of innocent Japanese CIVILIANS with the only nuclear weapons ever used in combat.
TRUMAN LIED AND INNOCENTS DIED! IMPEACH TRUMAN!
-To non-insiders, this looked like another example of good old boys and gals slapping each other on the back.-
Well, DUH. It's a White House press dinner. It's all ABOUT insiders. Is he jealous because he didn't get an invite? Poor widdwle weftie.
DOUG ELFMAN: "Dislike her if you insist, but Oprah really helps people."
To me all the "Bush is an idiot" jokes have jumped the shark, but the cumulative effect is dreadful. Even my Republican students have that same general attitude.
Worse than Chester Arthur? Worse than Grover Cleveland? Is this idiot some presidential historian?
Dubya's not glib, but I'll wager the Taliban and Sadamm and his surviving murdering thugs understand him perfectly now.
Even veteran WaPo Bush-hater/ultra-lib Richard Cohen thought Colbert's act was juvenile and insulting...and unfunny.
All it took to free the hostages was to kick Jimmah out. Betty Boop could have follwed Carter and the Iranians would have trembled.
It's no longer fun because the liberals of this country have become political satire.
You're right, Truman alipped to 22% in February 1952, yet he's regarded as a stand up guy who held to high principles when he had to.
The libs try and belittle Bush calling him "The Decider" but history will laugh at the when George W. "Te Decider" Bush and harry "The Buck Stops Here" Truman are evaluated as greater Presidents than Bill "I did not have sex with that woman" Clinton.
Very good. Great summary.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.