Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kennedy accident (another related thread)
Washington Post ^

Posted on 05/05/2006 7:24:46 AM PDT by Hammerhead

October 13, 2005 Sober = Drunk in Washington, DC posted by Daniel J. Solove I'm quite in favor of cracking down on DUI, but this story from the Washington Post is really disturbing:

Debra Bolton had a glass of red wine with dinner. That's what she told the police officer who pulled her over. That's what the Intoxilyzer 5000 breath test indicated -- .03, comfortably below the legal limit. She had been pulled over in Georgetown about 12:30 a.m. for driving without headlights. She apologized and explained that the parking attendant must have turned off her vehicle's automatic-light feature.

Bolton thought she might get a ticket. Instead, she was handcuffed, searched, arrested, put in a jail cell until 4:30 a.m. and charged with driving under the influence of alcohol.

Bolton, 45, an energy lawyer and single mother of two who lives in Alexandria, had just run into a little-known piece of D.C. law: In the District, a driver can be arrested with as little as .01 blood-alcohol content.

As D.C. police officer Dennis Fair, who arrested Bolton on May 15, put it in an interview recently: "If you get behind the wheel of a car with any measurable amount of alcohol, you will be dealt with in D.C. We have zero tolerance. . . . Anything above .01, we can arrest." Neither the police department nor the attorney general's office keeps detailed records of how many people with low blood alcohol levels are arrested. But last year, according to police records, 321 people were arrested for driving under the influence with blood alcohol levels below the legal limit of .08. In 2003, 409 people were arrested. . . .

Fair acknowledged that many people aren't aware of the District's policy. "But it is our law," he said. "If you don't know about it, then you're a victim of your own ignorance."

It strikes me as outrageous that people who are clearly not intoxicated (the national BAC limit is .08) are being arrested and charged with DUI. But what follows is even more troubling:

Not many people fight the charge, said Richard Lebowitz, another defense lawyer, because the District offers a "diversion program" of counseling for first-time offenders. "If diversion is offered and accepted, there's a guarantee that the charges will be dropped," Lebowitz said. "If you go to court and try to prove your innocence, it's a coin-flip. So most people choose diversion."

Bolton didn't. She balked at the $400 fee and the 24 hours of class time required to attend the "social drinker" program.

The system seems designed to encourage people just to accept a dubious criminal charge that would not stand up in court because fighting the charge can be more costly and time-consuming than just paying the fine and attending the class. Bolton decided to fight it as a matter of principle and hired a lawyer:

Since what she refers to as her "unfortunate incarceration," Bolton has spent hours in D.C. Superior Court and at the DMV and $2,000 so far fighting the DUI charge. Her refusal to submit to the 12-week alcohol counseling diversion program has sent her on a "surreal" odyssey. Twice, after hours of waiting, prosecutors told her that they had lost her file and that she would have to come back.

On Aug. 22, after four court appearances, prosecutors dropped the charge. But she spent all of September battling the DMV to keep her driving privileges from being suspended for three months.

Corey Buffo, the DMV's general counsel, explained that the agency drops its procedures only after a case goes to trial and is dismissed on its merits. "Our burden of proof is lower" than the Superior Court's, he said. "Not enough evidence for them may be enough evidence for us." Yesterday, the DMV decided not to suspend her privileges and issued her a warning instead.

This strikes me more like a form of extortion than a well-functioning criminal justice system.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: 1glassofwine; 2005; arrested; dwk; georgetown; patrickkennedy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
"Debra Bolton had a glass of red wine with dinner. That's what she told the police officer who pulled her over. That's what the Intoxilyzer 5000 breath test indicated -- .03, comfortably below the legal limit. She had been pulled over in Georgetown about 12:30 a.m. for driving without headlights. She apologized and explained that the parking attendant must have turned off her vehicle's automatic-light feature.

Bolton thought she might get a ticket. Instead, she was handcuffed, searched, arrested, put in a jail cell until 4:30 a.m. and charged with driving under the influence of alcohol.

Bolton, 45, an energy lawyer and single mother of two who lives in Alexandria, had just run into a little-known piece of D.C. law: In the District, a driver can be arrested with as little as .01 blood-alcohol content.

As D.C. police officer Dennis Fair, who arrested Bolton on May 15, put it in an interview recently: "If you get behind the wheel of a car with any measurable amount of alcohol, you will be dealt with in D.C. We have zero tolerance. . . . Anything above .01, we can arrest." Neither the police department nor the attorney general's office keeps detailed records of how many people with low blood alcohol levels are arrested. But last year, according to police records, 321 people were arrested for driving under the influence with blood alcohol levels below the legal limit of .08. In 2003, 409 people were arrested. . . .

Fair acknowledged that many people aren't aware of the District's policy. "But it is our law," he said. "If you don't know about it, then you're a victim of your own ignorance."

It strikes me as outrageous that people who are clearly not intoxicated (the national BAC limit is .08) are being arrested and charged with DUI. But what follows is even more troubling:

Not many people fight the charge, said Richard Lebowitz, another defense lawyer, because the District offers a "diversion program" of counseling for first-time offenders. "If diversion is offered and accepted, there's a guarantee that the charges will be dropped," Lebowitz said. "If you go to court and try to prove your innocence, it's a coin-flip. So most people choose diversion."

Bolton didn't. She balked at the $400 fee and the 24 hours of class time required to attend the "social drinker" program.

The system seems designed to encourage people just to accept a dubious criminal charge that would not stand up in court because fighting the charge can be more costly and time-consuming than just paying the fine and attending the class. Bolton decided to fight it as a matter of principle and hired a lawyer:

Since what she refers to as her "unfortunate incarceration," Bolton has spent hours in D.C. Superior Court and at the DMV and $2,000 so far fighting the DUI charge. Her refusal to submit to the 12-week alcohol counseling diversion program has sent her on a "surreal" odyssey. Twice, after hours of waiting, prosecutors told her that they had lost her file and that she would have to come back.

On Aug. 22, after four court appearances, prosecutors dropped the charge. But she spent all of September battling the DMV to keep her driving privileges from being suspended for three months.

Corey Buffo, the DMV's general counsel, explained that the agency drops its procedures only after a case goes to trial and is dismissed on its merits. "Our burden of proof is lower" than the Superior Court's, he said. "Not enough evidence for them may be enough evidence for us." Yesterday, the DMV decided not to suspend her privileges and issued her a warning instead.

This strikes me more like a form of extortion than a well-functioning criminal justice system. "

Man this pisses me off!

1 posted on 05/05/2006 7:24:50 AM PDT by Hammerhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hammerhead

And if you are a Kennedy, none of this applies.


2 posted on 05/05/2006 7:26:53 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hammerhead

Too bad she didn't have Kennedy at the end of her name.


3 posted on 05/05/2006 7:27:16 AM PDT by Shimmer128
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

If you are a Kennedy none of anything applies.


4 posted on 05/05/2006 7:28:40 AM PDT by steve8714 (Illegals are a pain in the butt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hammerhead

So why wasn't Congressman Kennedy handcuffed, searched, areested and put in a jail cell?


5 posted on 05/05/2006 7:30:05 AM PDT by quikdrw (Life is tough....it's even tougher if you are stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quikdrw

because the kennedys are the american royal family.


6 posted on 05/05/2006 7:33:53 AM PDT by Element187
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hammerhead

It strikes me as outrageous that people who are clearly not intoxicated (the national BAC limit is .08) are being arrested and charged with DUI.
___________

The author is a bit confused on this. Over .08 BAC and you will be charged with DWI, driving while intoxicated. Under .08 is DUI, driving under the influence. Much bigger problems with DWI than for DUI. .01 is a bit ridiculous, but I don't think that anywhere in America will you get a free pass for under .08.


7 posted on 05/05/2006 7:34:33 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hammerhead

So what's your opinion of mixing drugs and alcohol even though you're under the legal limit.


8 posted on 05/05/2006 7:36:07 AM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

"The rules don't apply to them." - Rush Limbaugh.


9 posted on 05/05/2006 7:36:44 AM PDT by CAWats (And I will make no distinction between terrorists and the democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hammerhead
This strikes me more like a form of extortion than a well-functioning criminal justice system.

No, it's a criminal justice system.
10 posted on 05/05/2006 7:37:11 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hammerhead

somehow I am missing the "Kennedy" in this story ...

I know that fat slob got off for murder for his REAL DUI, but other than making a slap at his being wrongly referred to as a human, I don't see him in the story anywhere .. (also since his DUI was in Massachusetts not DC.)


11 posted on 05/05/2006 7:37:16 AM PDT by AgThorn (Bush is my president, but he needs to protect our borders. FIRST, before any talk of "Amnesty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AgThorn

Patrick Kennedy's most recent crash ( 2nd in 3 weeks) was in DC, at the Capitol.


12 posted on 05/05/2006 7:41:11 AM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AgThorn

Wonder if her arrest has anything to do with her name being "Bolton"?


13 posted on 05/05/2006 7:42:48 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: expatpat

Oh THAT Kennedy .... thanks! I must get current with current events!! ;-)


14 posted on 05/05/2006 7:43:01 AM PDT by AgThorn (Bush is my president, but he needs to protect our borders. FIRST, before any talk of "Amnesty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hammerhead

How many Kennedy's does it take to change a lite bulb?

One to hold the bulb; The others just have to drink enough to get the room to spin.


15 posted on 05/05/2006 7:47:51 AM PDT by umgud (the profound is only so to those that it is)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hammerhead

Does anything good ever come out of D.C.


16 posted on 05/05/2006 7:48:05 AM PDT by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hammerhead

It isn't just DC. The usual wording of the law is this: That you are presumed DUI above a certain BAC (usualy 0.8, these days), but that you can be arrested with any measurable BAC coupled with any evidence of impairment. It's not enough to sustain a conviction, but it's probable cause for an arrest.

Georgia state law, at least as I learned it in Driver's Ed many years ago, also allowed the cops to hold an apparently impaired driver until he sobers up. Without any need to bring charges.


17 posted on 05/05/2006 7:50:39 AM PDT by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hammerhead

We have lots of stupid laws and lots of stupid LEOs to go with them....


18 posted on 05/05/2006 7:59:08 AM PDT by clintonh8r (Fake but accurate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hammerhead
"She had been pulled over in Georgetown about 12:30 a.m. for driving without headlights. She apologized and explained that the parking attendant must have turned off her vehicle's automatic-light feature."

So it's the parking attendant's fault that she didn't turn her lights on while driving?

Where is the personal responsibility? It's always someone else's fault. Ridiculous.

19 posted on 05/05/2006 8:03:42 AM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
And if you are a Kennedy, none of this applies.

Actually, if you are a member of Congress, none of this applies. Under Article 1 Section 6 of the US Constitution, the police cannot arrest or even question a Member of Congress if he is on his way to or from a debate in Congress.

The Police did the right thing in Patches' case, as uncomfortable as that fact is. Patches has a special immunity. Yet one more reason to never send a Kennedy to Congress.

20 posted on 05/05/2006 8:06:31 AM PDT by bondjamesbond (RICE 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson