Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Illegal Immigration Counter Protesters Detained
OrbusMax ^ | 5/4/06 | SteveB

Posted on 05/04/2006 8:53:59 AM PDT by StevenB

Illegal Immigration Counter Protesters Detained

The topic of discussion on the Bryan Suits radio show on 570 KVI earlier this evening was a call by a Seattle area citizen, Eric, who called to say that while thousands of illegal immigrants marched a couple of feet away, 5 United States citizens, he being one of the 5, who should be covered by all of the constitutional amendments, including the 1st and 2nd, were detained by the Seattle Police Department for over 2 hours because... well hard to say really. The reason for Caller Eric's call into the show was, surprise, surprise, the medias total lack of coverage of what should be a fairly big story. U.S. Citizens constitutional rights infringed in order to protect illegal aliens non existent right to hold a protest march.

Now I am a regular listener of the Bryan Suits show, as you should be, especially if you, like me, are in the male 35-64 year old demographic, and as Bryan can testify, I am also a regular emailer, but did not catch every single minute of the show since the 5pm to 8pm time slot is right in that end of the work day - drive home - eat dinner time window so I may have missed out on some of the conversation but here is a recap as best as I can recall. Full disclosure on my part requires that I state my Father is a 25 year retired Seattle Police Officer and I may or may not own a gun, try breaking into my house and you may or may not get an answer right then and there.

It all started with a 911 call from someone the police say was not part of the march claiming that there was a group of people with signs opposed to the marchers who were armed. The caller said he saw a gun holster sticking out from a partly open jacket. The police responded to the call and found the counter protesters and asked if any of them had weapons and sure enough, 3 of the 5 had guns and one had a switchblade or some sort of knife. Caller Eric said he was the one counter protester that did not have a weapon. At that point they were cuffed and taken to the West precinct where they spent the next 2 plus hours being detained until the march was over. The problem is they had not violated the law as the 3 with guns had valid concealed carry permits and as best as I can tell while switchblades appear to be illegal, there was no mention of the person carrying the knife being arrested or charged with a crime.

A Seattle Police officer, who called himself Steve, called into the show to give his version of the events. While for the most part, the stories matched, Office Steve's main point was they felt they were doing the appropriate thing in order to potentially avoid a violent situation and needed to take the people to the station in order to do a proper investigation. As Bryan Suits said, it was kind of a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation for the police but he, along with myself, kept asking under what authority were these people detained and why did it take over 2 hours to finish the investigation and let them leave? Bryan's conclusion, as was mine was it seems fairly obvious that the message from the police hierarchy was to hold these people until the march was over. One thing that bothered me about the conversation with Officer Steve was how Suits had to explain to him it is legal to openly carry a firearm. In the State of Washington you must have a concealed carry permit to have a concealed weapon but not to openly carry. Officer Steve made a comment that implied he thought since the holster was partly visible, that was in some way a violation of the law since the weapon was no longer concealed, which is not the case.

Later a female caller gave Bryan a ring and said she was one of the counter protesters who was packing heat. The first question from Bryan was in effect, what were you thinking bringing a gun into a situation like that even though you are totally within your rights to do so? Her response was she always has her gun with her, expect in bars and other "gun free zones" or as I like to call them, "potential sitting duck shooting galleries". She mentioned that the gun was in her purse and they told the officers when they first asked about the weapons that they had valid permits for them. She said once at the station they were told they would be released once the march was over which contradicted what Office Steve said about it just taking that long to finish the investigation and there was no intent to simply hold them until the march was over.

Now last I checked, United States Citizens have a 1st amendment right to free speech and even in Seattle we have a 2nd amendment right to keep and bear arms and it sure seems to me like those and potentially others were violated. I do know one thing, if I were one of the Seattle 5, I would "lawyer up" and have filed a lawsuit against the City yesterday, because as I emailed Bryan, until the city gets hit with a lawsuit and pays a big judgment, expect this kind of thing to keep on happening. My one question of any city official is when did POTENTIALLY preventing a violent situation supersede our constitutional rights?

Thursday on the Bryan Suits show, where you can listen to live over the internet by going here, the hope is someone from the City will be on to discuss this topic in further detail. Also, its Led Zeppelin Thursday, so get your request in early.

If anyone has any additional information, clarification or corrections, please post them in the comments and I will update accordingly.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: aliens; atf; bang; banglist; batf; batfe; bradywatch; ccw; donutwatch; federalgovernment; feds; govwatch; guncontrol; immigrantlist; immigration; jackbootedthugs; janetreno; libertarians; libs; pc; politicalcorrectness; protests; racism; rkba; seattle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-303 next last

1 posted on 05/04/2006 8:54:02 AM PDT by StevenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: StevenB

Let's see if the skunks from the aclu jump to help these people sue.


2 posted on 05/04/2006 8:57:38 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Everyday brings a new reason to distrust Hillary Clinton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Hopefully the NRA will help out.


3 posted on 05/04/2006 8:58:30 AM PDT by saganite (Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: StevenB

btt


4 posted on 05/04/2006 8:59:07 AM PDT by NW Mike (Proud member of the VRWC since 1972 -- who the hell are you calling 'neo'?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StevenB
Last Monday, a lot of FReepers were demanding to know where all the anti-illegals counter demonstrators. Many of answered "work."

Looks like some who did take a day off to counter-protest the illegals were carted off to jail for "public safety" concerns. Interesting.

5 posted on 05/04/2006 9:05:08 AM PDT by cake_crumb (Leftist Credo: One Wing to Rule them All and to the Darkside Bind them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite

'Minority Report' in real life..

So they can arrest 5 legal citizens but they can't find out who is illegal criminal out of 500,000 people marching???

We need PD & City contact info here..


6 posted on 05/04/2006 9:05:13 AM PDT by b2stealth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: StevenB

The issue should be referred to the U.S Justice department, and the Seattle officers should be arrested for civil rights violations.


7 posted on 05/04/2006 9:05:37 AM PDT by ScottfromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StevenB
Though some may believe it wasn't too smart to bring guns with them, as violent as peacenik-types are, and a lot of illegals fall into that category, they really might have needed those guns to protect them from the peaceful demonstrators.

I can't say the police did the right thing. Protection would have been far better, even though the protestors were a riot waiting to happen. They should have been prepared for that eventuality, too.

8 posted on 05/04/2006 9:10:56 AM PDT by cake_crumb (Leftist Credo: One Wing to Rule them All and to the Darkside Bind them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b2stealth

West Precinct, where they were detained
810 Virginia St.
Seattle, WA
98101
(206)615-1999

Chief of Police:
(206)684-5577

Mayor's office:
(206) 684-4000


I am working on getting a case number. There was a report written up. So far I am getting the run around.


9 posted on 05/04/2006 9:11:51 AM PDT by StevenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: StevenB
Once again, STUPID COPS who cannot comprehend the Constitution they swore an oath to uphold blow it big time. All police officers should be required to take a course in Constitutional Law and read, (and tested on), "The Federalist Papers" before they're put on the streets.

Whoever in the "police hierarchy" that authorized this and wanted them "held until the march was over" should be fired iommediately and lose every cent of any vested retirement account.

We either have a Constitution or we don't, and "maintaining civil order" isn't a valid excuse for this kind of crap.
10 posted on 05/04/2006 9:11:57 AM PDT by Crispus Attucks Patriot (The first to give his life for your liberty was a Black man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StevenB

How do you send this article to the Dept of Justice?


11 posted on 05/04/2006 9:12:24 AM PDT by native texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StevenB

bump for later.


12 posted on 05/04/2006 9:12:42 AM PDT by Centurion2000 (Before I refuse to take your questions, I have an opening statement. - Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StevenB
Can we bail them out with these?


13 posted on 05/04/2006 9:14:27 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StevenB
So, the rights of American citizens that are supposed to be protected by the Constitution - specifically those mentioned in the 1st and 2nd Amendments in the Bill of Rights - are being violated in order to give rights to the hordes of marching invaders who neither possess nor deserve those rights.

I, for one, welcome our new alien overlords. < /sarcasm >

14 posted on 05/04/2006 9:17:35 AM PDT by Spiff ("They start yelling, 'Murderer!' 'Traitor!' They call me by name." - Gael Murphy, Code Pink leader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crispus Attucks Patriot

I just got thought taking to the mayor. She said she would like to read the article. Her e-mail is: Cheryl.Brush@seattle.gov

I'm sending her a copy. I think she may need more than one.


15 posted on 05/04/2006 9:21:06 AM PDT by native texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: StevenB

I'd say a lawsuit is in order.


16 posted on 05/04/2006 9:21:38 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici (ICE, ICE Baby.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

not a bad idea


17 posted on 05/04/2006 9:24:02 AM PDT by ziggy_dlo (The answer is not less guns, it is more. Hell, the criminals have 'em! - Danny Crane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

if they have no rights they should not be allowed to congregate.
plain and simple.
But they let it go on.
WOW i though i spent my tax money on having the govermnet and police do their jobs.
silly me!


18 posted on 05/04/2006 9:27:12 AM PDT by ziggy_dlo (The answer is not less guns, it is more. Hell, the criminals have 'em! - Danny Crane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: native texan

You know what the best thing is about blogs? It puts all this BS that would usually slip under the radar in the spotlight. No more hiding it as a local issue that would usually go nowhere.


19 posted on 05/04/2006 9:37:46 AM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ziggy_dlo

Let me think about this. I am going to go to a rally that is populated by mostly illegals. Would I carry a gun if I had a CCW permit? Does anyone actually have to think about that for any period of time?

Sheesh.


20 posted on 05/04/2006 9:41:18 AM PDT by Stashiu (RVN, 1969-70)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-303 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson