Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Six years later, the Dow is back
Christian Science Monitor ^ | May 1, 2006 | Ron Scherer

Posted on 05/01/2006 9:12:13 AM PDT by West Coast Conservative

Without much fanfare, the Dow Jones Industrial Average is closing in on its all-time high, set at the beginning of 2000 before Americans became disenchanted with stocks and turned to real estate.

Despite soaring oil prices, the Dow, watched as a barometer of the economy and Main Street, has regained more than 4,000 points that slipped away after the dotcom bust and the 2001 recession. Now, the average is closer than it's ever been to its Jan. 14, 2000, high of 11,723 - a number that brings back memories of taxi drivers talking about their stock portfolios and a book predicting a 36,000 level for the Dow.

Behind the rebound is a solid economy, emphasized last Friday when the Commerce Department reported that the nation's gross domestic product grew at a swift 4.8 percent, the best growth in 2-1/2 years. Indeed, the healthy economy is pumping up corporate earnings, which have been growing at double-digit rates. Some of the fastest-growing engines of economic growth are at the nation's smallest companies, whose stocks have averaged about a 20 percent gain per year for the past five years.

Some analysts expect the next leg in the economy to be powered by the capital spending of cash-rich companies.

"The economy is fundamentally sound," says Scott Brown, chief economist at Raymond James & Associates in St. Petersburg, Fla. "Even though economists have been expecting the economy to slow, recent data suggest it's not that soft."

Last week, companies from Chevron to Microsoft to GlaxoSmithKline reported healthy earnings increases. "The last few years, Wall Street analysts have continued to underestimate earnings, and that's true today. The majority of companies are beating the estimates," says Art Nunes of IMS Capital Management in Portland, Ore.

One reason is that even though times are good, US companies still act as if they might have to close their doors tomorrow, squeezing productivity gains out of their machines and workers. This was evident again last Friday, when the government reported that wage and salary growth was flat in the first quarter despite a relatively low 4.8 percent unemployment rate. "After the big recession, companies really pulled in their horns, trimmed their capital expenditures, became leaner and meaner," says Mr. Nunes.

In addition, reforms enacted in the wake of the Enron scandal and other corporate lapses have helped boost Wall Street's confidence in profit-and-loss statements. For example, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act mandates more corporate accountability in earnings reports. "The Sarbanes-Oxley legislation maybe brought some confidence back," says David Chalupnik, head of equities at First American Funds, which manages $90 billion in investments. "The market's been solid ever since."

The market has also avoided "irrational exuberance," as former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan termed the go-go 1990s. One key indicator is the price-to-earnings ratio: A lower ratio signals a more conservative investment outlook. Mr. Chalupnik says the market is currently selling at a price-to-earnings ratio of about 16 times earnings, compared with a more typical 18 times earnings. "If we go back to 17 times earnings for the Standard & Poor's or the Dow, prices would be about 6 to 7 percent higher than today," says Chalupnik. "That gives you a normal market return."

However, other analysts point out that the dynamics facing the economy are also starting to change. The Federal Reserve has raised interest rates 15 consecutive times. Next week, it is expected to hike rates another quarter of a percent.

"The engine for the recovery was cheap money, which fueled housing, which fueled borrowing, which fueled home equity and allowed people to take the cash out in home-equity loans for goods and services," says Jim Svinth, chief economist at LendingTree.com, an online mortgage lender based in Irvine, Calif. "There is always a lag in monetary policy in getting back to the consumer, and it will probably take six to 18 months for this to work its way through."

Others worry that the Fed may not be done raising rates. Ben Bernanke, the new Fed chairman, has indicated that the Fed may pause after it probably raises rates next week. But he hasn't ruled out raising them again in the future. "Factor in that the Fed may not be done, higher-than-expected energy prices, and a consumer who is stretched, and it does give us cause for concern," says J. Michael Barron, CEO of Knott Capital in Exton, Pa.

The market is trying to "sort through a lot of data" to determine the shape of the economy in the future, says Mr. Barron. "If the Fed has to cut interest rates next year, it will mean economic growth is slowing, and the question for stock investors is what does that mean for future earnings streams," he says.

Some market watchers point out that stocks have been rising in the face of the Fed ratcheting up short-term interest rates for some time. At least over the near term, that will continue, they believe. "We're bullish on the market over the short term. The economy is good, inflation is low, and earnings growth is terrific," says Chalupnik. But he adds, "What has changed is that long-term interest rates have started to move up, and that should start to affect economic growth. We are concerned that the expectations for the market for the second half of the year are too high."

But other stock-market players maintain that interest-rate movements are irrelevant for long-term investors. "Corporations worry about China, inflation, interest rates. They sell off parts of a company if they're not making any sense," says Jim Cullen of Schafer Cullen Capital Management in New York. His firm is known for "value" investing - that is, finding companies that the market may have overlooked. "As an investor, you just to make sure the corporate managers are halfway on the ball."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; busheconomy; bushlegacy; bushsfault; djia; dow; dowjones; economy; market; oil; stockmarket; stocks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 05/01/2006 9:12:15 AM PDT by West Coast Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

2 posted on 05/01/2006 9:16:04 AM PDT by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

This is impossible. Everybody knows Bush brought us the worst economy since Herbert Hoover.


3 posted on 05/01/2006 9:16:26 AM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

John Hoover Kerry must be crying in his ketchup.


4 posted on 05/01/2006 9:17:10 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

page one of the ny slimes no?


5 posted on 05/01/2006 9:23:52 AM PDT by italianquaker (Democrats and media can't win elections at least they can win their phony polls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Wouldn't S&P500 be more reliable as a general indicator? And in it it's not even close.


6 posted on 05/01/2006 9:24:29 AM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: italianquaker
page one of the ny slimes

Are you taking bets on that?

;->

7 posted on 05/01/2006 9:26:31 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
IMHO, the Dow, consisting of just 30 companies, is "your Father's index."

The S&P 500 is a much more reliable indicator. But even with 500 companies it still doesn't reflect the "real market."

To me, indices like the Russell 2000 are more indicative of what the market is really doing.

8 posted on 05/01/2006 9:49:05 AM PDT by upchuck (Wikipedia.com - the most unbelievable web site in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Despite soaring oil prices, the Dow, watched as a barometer of the economy and Main Street, has regained more than 4,000 points that slipped away after the dotcom bust and the 2001 recession.

Pathetic. It's as if 9/11 didn't even happen. No-o-o-o, that didn't have any adverse impact on the economy. Not a bit!

9 posted on 05/01/2006 10:02:29 AM PDT by Coop (Proud founding member of GCA - Gruntled Conservatives of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Argus

Now it is the job of the Bushies to promote this and fill the MSM with these facts on a daily basis. They have largely failed to advertize this and it has taken the Talk Radio, Blog, Fox and Cavuto to point this out. I still hear from my senior students just how terrible the job situation is. Baloney. Jobs are there but this entitlement generation will not deign to take some of them.


10 posted on 05/01/2006 10:17:10 AM PDT by phillyfanatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
Russell 3000: Uh-huh


11 posted on 05/01/2006 10:20:19 AM PDT by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: phillyfanatic

IB4BF

In before Bush's fault!!


12 posted on 05/01/2006 10:20:42 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Democrats = The Culture of Treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Dispite the monumental failures of the Republican Congress and the fury of its base support (Middle America) over them, there are overriding reasons to vote for and re-elect Republicans to Congress this November, to wit:
The economy is booming!

9/11 was never repeated--thanks to President G. W. Bush!

Republicans are lax on Illegal Immigration and Open Borders. Democrats actively encourage both because they expect them to enlarge the Democrat base support!

No one in his right mind would entrust National Security--or anything else of importance--to the likes of Nancy Pelosi!


13 posted on 05/01/2006 10:34:06 AM PDT by Savage Beast (The Spirit of Flight 93 is the Spirit of America! RIP Todd Beamer! Be forewarned, America's Enemies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Oh yeah, and
Republicans--NOT Democrats--must have the authority to appoint judges.

14 posted on 05/01/2006 10:35:56 AM PDT by Savage Beast (The Spirit of Flight 93 is the Spirit of America! RIP Todd Beamer! Be forewarned, America's Enemies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marblehead17

ping


15 posted on 05/01/2006 11:44:14 AM PDT by marblehead17 (I love it when a plan comes together.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

That's nothing.

Jimmy Carter was able to push the Dow right down to 700 or so. So there.

;-)


16 posted on 05/01/2006 12:03:21 PM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

What caused the 50+ Dow drop in the last 20 minutes?


17 posted on 05/01/2006 12:43:15 PM PDT by SierraWasp (Without consistent core conservatives in charge, the GOP is fast becoming the Gelded Old Party!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Never mind!

Stocks turn lower on report Bernanke feels 'misunderstood'

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- U.S. stocks turned lower Monday after a CNBC anchor said Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke had told her that the markets had misunderstood his congressional testimony, interpreting him as more dovish than he was on interest rates. Noted CNBC news anchor Maria Bartiromo announced on the air that she had a private conversation with Bernanke at a Washington dinner on Saturday and Bernanke told her that the media misunderstood his remarks. In testimony to Congress on Thursday, Bernanke said: "there is ... the possibility that if there is sufficient uncertainty, that we may chose to pause, simply to gain more information to learn better what the true risks are and how the economy is actually evolving." Bartiromo said that Bernanke told her that he was trying to create flexibility for the central bank and data would determine rate moves The Dow Jones Industrial Average ($INDU : Dow Jones Industrial Average News , chart, profile, more Last: 11,346.81-20.33-0.18%

18 posted on 05/01/2006 12:56:01 PM PDT by SierraWasp (Without consistent core conservatives in charge, the GOP is fast becoming the Gelded Old Party!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
When the DEMS take back congress in 06 and then the White House in 08 and the DOW falls to 8500, I hope the only folks effected are those fools who spend their time bashing BUSH for everything.
19 posted on 05/01/2006 2:05:40 PM PDT by wmileo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Without much fanfare, the Dow Jones Industrial Average is closing in on its all-time high

Yeah, without much fanfare because the press doesn't report it.

20 posted on 05/01/2006 2:44:19 PM PDT by speedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson