Posted on 04/28/2006 9:03:39 AM PDT by Bob J
In a just concluded debate and press conference, author and FBI Consultant Paul Williams and Jeff Epstein of "America's Truth Forum" reveal they have been advised by Pakistani journalist and Bin Laden biographer Hamid Amir that Al-Qaeda will use smuggled nukes against the US if the US takes military action against Iran.
Amir established his credentials by correctly predicting that Egypt would be hit by terrorist action a full two weeks prior to the events of last week. Amir, a Pakistani journalist, has been in contact with high ranking Al-Qaeda officials for several years.
The debate (between Richard Miniter and Paul Williams) and press conference were webcast LIVE by Rightalk.com. Audio files of both events will be available for downloading by this afternoon.
Well, I've advocated all along a "war on Islam" -- in order to totally eliminate it from the world and make it illegal everywhere you find it. If we can't do that -- then we are going to be cursed with Islamic terrorist until "Kingdom come". And that won't be too much longer anyway...
Ah, the perfect segway into the prescient mind of a precocious 24 year old Winston Churchill commenting on Islam in his 1899 master work, The River War.
Take it away, Winston
“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity.
The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceasedto be a great power among men. Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities – but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.”
-Sir Winston Churchill (The River War, first edition, Vol. II, pages248-50 (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1899).
Of course he did. And I'll bet you're going to run right out and buy his book.
Benny Hinn has made a quite comfortable living convincing sick people that he can heal them. Listen to him sometime and tell me he doesn't sound believeable and completely trustworthy in his motivations.
So, where would you bomb first?
"Something like, say, hundreds of thousands of people out in the streets of a large number of major cities all at the same time?"
Sounds like a Cindy Sheehan rally to me.
Bring.
It.
And what would be your first 10 targets?
They are so easy to spot, they are taking the fun out of it.
Precisely - if they had 'em, they'd a used 'em.
You mean like on May 1st when a bunch of commies are celebrating? We can only hope...
Unfortunately, we will never see such a demonstration of power. Just as one shark generally won't eat another (out of professional courtesy), one group of anti-Americans won't prey on another group of anti-Americans.
I'd have liked to see Mecca and Medina go up right after 9/11, that night. We'd simply say, who is next? The Iraq war wouldn't have been fought, and we wouldn't have the problem with Iran either.
North Korea was so far along that they'd probably not be stopped. That's a big thorn.
However, we'd simply take out the religous sites that the 9/11 hijackers and supporters cared so much for, and then say 'it's over with now. The score is even'.
Then we'd sit and concentrate intelligence and make darn sure Iran/Iraq didn't produce WMD's. If we even thought they might, nuke their plants. If that didn't stop them, move towards population centers.
That's how we utterly won WW2. That's how this should be fought.
For a great read about Islime go to yati.org and select "Sermon notes" and pull up "The Final End Timr Beast". And read about Saudi Arabia-Mecca-Iran and so forth.
Well put. That's really what my tagline implies.
The source of my tagline if from a conversation I was having with my 13 year old son. He was asking me about terrorism and trying to get a handle on the "War on Terrorism" since it doesn't have any true borders.
What I was explaining to him was that this war is not like Vietnam. You cant just walk away from it and that let that region take care of itself. Vietnam didn't attack us after we left. Islam would. And there will be consequences if we "give up" that will span beyond even his generation. And then I said what's in my tagline.
wishful thinking. They could be coordinating and being very careful about it. Who would've thought on 9/10 that they could've had such abilities to pull off 9/11? They can surprise us again.
Yes, and we all know the Democrats are all for closing the border.
(If a nuke goes off within the United States, the status of the Republican party would not be a major concern of mine.)
Well said. Clearly, logically and dispassionately surrendering the field.
Of course, as most such posters do, you accompanied your non-surrender surrender with gratuitious, nasty and totally unsubstantiated slander and personal attacks. You have absolutely nothing to say that addresses any of the points I made and provided logical support for so you slip into name calling
Again, well done. Well said. 10 out of 10 for sleaze, but minus several million for logic or honor.
I call what you did "going down whining."
No I will not buy his book...without this becoming a silly little pissing posting war between us...why are you so convinced he is completely wrong? I hope you are right but what if it is true. Hey, the hosts of the debate laid out some serious arguments. I don't know to what degree I believe him but I will not allow myself to write off anyone I disagree with as out to make a buck before I hear him out.
Honestly-have you read his book? Why are you so sure he is wrong. I'm just hedging my bets , keeping my powder dry, and making sure my family is prepared. If based on BS so be it...
You said -- "Well, okey dokey, then. If you read my posts on this thread, you'll see that I've never advocated nuking anyone. I merely countered someone else's assertion that New York was a "terrorist-friendly" city."
Well, at the very least, then -- stay out of any "terrorist-friendly city" in the U.S., because you may be nuked.
You are expendable in the war on terrorist and the "nuke-em first" crowd.
Wait a minute -- I just got to thinking. If you're in a "non-terrorist friendly city" -- you'll be nuked by the terrorist. And if you're in a "terrorist-friendly city" -- you'll be nuked by the "nuke-em first" crowd.
Come to think about it, there isn't any place you can be in the U.S.
Regards,
Star Traveler
"However, we'd simply take out the religous sites that the 9/11 hijackers and supporters cared so much for, and then say 'it's over with now. The score is even'."
Ya, that'll work...
It won't matter. All they'll need to do is posture as if they will.
How would it not work? They'd up the ante? Then we'd up the ante, and we have a larger betting pool. We can quash this, or play games. You seem to enjoy the games.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.