Well.....not necessarily....
Posted on 04/27/2006 4:55:19 AM PDT by IrishMike
To understand the meaning of the gay invasion of this year's White House Easter Egg Roll, let me ask you a pointed question: Would you use your children to make a political point? Would you shlep your kids somewhere to help advance an agenda?
On Monday, April 17, an estimated 100 "gay families" descended on the White House lawn, kiddies in tow. The annual event is open to the first 1,000 families in line.
This street theater came to us courtesy of Mel White (self-styled "militant gay activist") who's into using his cadre to crash Christian colleges and churches that dissent from the happy (gay) cause. Protestors wore rainbow colored Hawaiian leis to identify themselves. For them to be there without being in-our-face would have served no useful purpose.
Organizers disingenuously claimed that they were not playing politics, and--in the same breath--admitted that's exactly what they were doing.
"We not protesting the president's policies on gay families," said Jennifer Chrisler, executive director of Family Pride (the force behind the rainbow putsch). "We are, however, helping him understand that gay families exist in this country (he didn't know that?) and deserve rights and protections that all families need."
Oh, and what would those rights and protections be--lifestyle indoctrination in the schools, allowing homosexuals to serve openly in the military, abolishing the few remaining barriers to gay adoption, sticking a finger in the eye of state voters who've adopted defense of marriage amendments, harassing the Catholic Church for refusing to place adoptive children with the rainbow families, crushing dissent from gay dogma, and the deconstruction of marriage--little stuff like that?
(Excerpt) Read more at chronwatch.com ...
A family is a man and a woman joined by marriage, with or without children. Two male homosexuals, or two lesbians, who are roommates, engaging in mutual acts of sodomy, aren't a family. Two homosexuals who have children are just that--two homosexuals who have children. They're no more a family than a fish with a machine gun is an army.
Homosexuals acquire children--through adoption, artificial insemination, or from a previous marriage. And now they're using our natural sympathy for children as a weapon to normalize the abnormal--to put the healthy and life-giving on the same plane as the sick and life-negating.....>
<......* The Salvation Army is also a target. In D.C., activists have urged public officials to boycott the group's kettle campaign, calling the best charity in America "homophobic group," for refusing to provide domestic-partner benefits. How many poor children have been helped by these notorious homophobes over the past 141 years?
* Because it refuses to place adoptive children with homosexuals, activists are going after Catholic Charities, the nation's largest provider of adoption services. They used a state anti-discrimination law to force the church to stop doing placements in Massachusetts. The San Francisco City Council, a rubber-stamp for the movement, recently passed a resolution excoriating the Catholic Church for refusing to bow to the fashion of the times.
* Churches that adhere to scriptural teaching might as well have bull's-eyes painted on their doors. In Europe and Canada, ministers have been prosecuted for proclaiming the Bible's truth about what Leviticus calls an "abomination." Activists' goal is to put out of business the churches that dissent from same-sex dogma. If millions of children grow up without the word of God, that's a price militants are willing to pay to enforce their orthodoxy.
* The family is the crucible of civilization--a culture for growing healthy children with real values. Through gay "marriage," homosexuals are intent on destroying the family as we know it, with all of the social chaos that will ensue. After society is forced to treat same-sex couples as "families," we can move on to the legitimization of so-called group marriage. (HBO is presently laying down a polygamy propaganda barrage with its series "Big Love.") ...>
If they're going after the Easter Bunny, I'm sure they'll be sneaking up from behind.
Well.....not necessarily....
"In their sights" -- Peter Singer does say sex with animals is ok, after all.
turd burgler alert!!!
If you're Al Gore, you do.
Like they have with gerbils?
"let me ask you a pointed question: Would you use your children to make a political point? Would you shlep your kids somewhere to help advance an agenda?"
Anyone who's dragged little kids along in freezing January weather to protest - or support - Roe v. Wade, has done THAT. :) So yes, a lot of people would do exactly that.
Next problem.
Two homosexuals who have children are just that--two homosexuals who have [other peoples] children.
As I have said before; Easter is a pagan festival and nothing to do with the Passover gift of life in the resurrection anyway. We should give this abomination to the queers where it fits so well. Coloring eggs and worshiping rabbits as fertility emblems of gods.....ARGH!
shalom
Two homosexuals who have children are just that--two homosexuals who have [other peoples] children.
As I have said before; Easter is a pagan festival and nothing to do with the Passover gift of life in the resurrection anyway. We should give this abomination to the queers where it fits so well. Coloring eggs and worshiping rabbits as fertility emblems of gods.....ARGH!
shalom
One correction: two lesbians are "engaging in mutual acts of" masturbation.
IMO homosexuals have no problems using children as pawns in their political games because their intention is to raise them as homosexuals.
Intentional or not a child living in a home where 2 males or 2 females are kissing and fondling each other in front of the kids is bound to have the effect of helping that child to become homosexual. I cant help but believe that if a member of NAMBLA is raising a child , that child is likely to be assaulted some time before he turns 12.
There was a mistake made when we become "tolerant" of deviant behaviour.
There is no such thing as "sexual orientation" and besides even if one was "orientated" to a certain behaviour, that does not make it right.
This is the creed that the left lives by - that right and wrong are merely subjective.
Amazing that they see nothing wrong in what they do and yet would scream like hell if a group of Christians entered a gay bar under the same premises to make a political statement.
So much of the homosexual agenda is about access to children.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.