Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Molehills And Mountains
dansargis.org ^ | April 26, 2006 | Dan Sargis

Posted on 04/26/2006 1:24:06 PM PDT by Dr.Syn

 

 

Molehills And Mountains

April 27, 2006 

The New York Times never held a hand of race cards that it didn’t like to play.  That is, of course, as long as the race cards were the right color.  Welcome to the NY Slimes’ fantasyland of Bizarro-Apartheid.  You know...that pharisaical world where white transgressions are mountains and all others are but a molehill. 

And speaking of molehills...the Slimes is certainly making much ado about nothing out of the Duke University lacrosse team’s situation.  As the entire universe is now aware, three “white” Duke laxers “raped” a “black” stripper...uh, I mean...” a 27-year-old single mother, student and wannabe lawyer”. 

As the story continuously unfolds, this “27-year-old single mother of two” with a previous criminal record for: stealing a taxi driver’s car after giving him a lap dance; leading police on a high-speed chase; driving with more than twice the legal limit of alcohol in her and trying to run over a deputy...had “held factory and store jobs but had begun working for an escort service to help pay for college”.   

Jesse Jackson has even “been told that she had plans to go to law school” and he wants to “to help her with that” by giving her a scholarship funded by the tax free dollars from “his Chicago-based Rainbow/Push Coalition” (where’s Tawana Brawley when you need her). 

By the way, will those will be the same tax-exempt dollars that Jackson used to pay his mistress, Karen Stanford, up to $120,000 per year plus a relocation bonus of $35,000 when she became pregnant with his child? 

I bet Jackson “can't wait ... to talk...and have prayer with” the “27-year-old single mother of two”.   

Even though there is no DNA match between the evidence “on or about” the stripper’s body and anyone from the Duke lax team, North Carolina’s Durham County district attorney Michael B. Nifong got a grand jury to indict two of the players (and a ham sandwich) based on a photo “lineup of 46 photos individually depicting all the Duke lacrosse team members” and nobody else.  Nifong is pressing for a third indictment.   

Hey Michael...I guess you take what you get in an election year even if the real evidence suggests that at least one of the indicted was not even in the building when the “rape” occurred. 

Based on this extraordinarily conclusive evidence, the New York Times jumped on the opportunity to run this story along with the names and home-state addresses of the indicted Duke students...oh, that’s right...the stripper is a student but these white kids are privileged lacrosse players. 

Not only did the NYT’s run this story, but they ran it again and again and again. 

In fact, an article search of the NYT’s website for the last 30days using the combined terms of Duke, White and Lacrosse yields 26 related printings. 

While the country was racially imploding over the alleged rape of a “black” stripper by 3 “rich white” laxers, a minor sideshow transpired in Las Vegas. 

In a scene that could been from the movie Hotel Rwanda, a gang (team?) of 15 to 20 people in their late teens and early 20s carried out what could be up to six robberies and beatings throughout the Las Vegas area last weekend (and unlike Duke, this was caught live on security video).  This color of the perpetrators was not released by the local media until it was graphically obvious that they are black and the color of the victims has never been mentioned (how do you spell Black Stripper-White Lacrosse Players?). 

And speaking of never being mentioned...an article search of the NYT’s website for the last 30 days using the search terms Las Vegas, Attack and Black yields not a single NYT’s article on this rampage.  Not one. 

Let’s put this in perspective.   

A group of 15 to 20 black individuals commit up to six robberies and beatings over a two day period in a major American city and not an ounce of ink about it is printed on the pages of the NYT’s.  In fact, the entire universe of the MSM is sketchy at best on the details of this rampage.   

As pieced together, here is the rampage’s timeline: 

1.       Saturday April 22 at 1:00am – A Walmart manager is beaten in the store’s parking lot and a female customer is beaten and robbed in the same parking lot for trying to call the police.

2.       By 2:30am the gang  beats and robs a 23 year old maintenance worker outside the MGM Grand Hotel (the victim suffered a broken jaw and collarbone)

3.       By 3:00am an innocent tourist is beaten and robbed outside a nearby Travelodge motel.

4.       Sunday April 23 at 2:30am the gang ransacked a Las Vegas grocery store, beat a customer and threatened to kill the store’s clerk.

5.       At 3:00am the gang beat and robbed an innocent couple at a nearby park.

6.       Within minutes of that, a man was shot in the same park.

Now that is a mountain! 

Yet, the Slimes et al totally ignore this mountain and elevate the molehill of a single alleged rape to 911 status. 

As one Durham resident commented about the alleged rape, “I'm trying not to call it racial terrorism, but that's really what it is.” 

Yes, it is racial terrorism...but against whom?  The “white” Duke laxers who have so far been completely exonerated by DNA evidence are still on the MSMs’ front pages with their lives already destroyed.  While...a black gang rampaging like a Hutu death squad is completely ignored. 

I guess that Al Sharpton was way ahead of the curve when he once asked “What's wrong with denouncing white interlopers?”  It has just taken the New York Times a few years to get on board.



TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; US: Nevada; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: duke; dukelax; dukerape; durham; lacrosse; mgm; nifong
While the country was racially imploding over the alleged rape of a “black” stripper by 3 “rich white” laxers, a minor sideshow transpired in Las Vegas.

Always love a little sarcasm.

1 posted on 04/26/2006 1:24:08 PM PDT by Dr.Syn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dr.Syn

I am sure they were all just trying to feed their children and we should show them some compassion...I mean if the world wasn't against them as young black men, they would surely have real jobs. Plus, I am sure that their victims have some really bad behavior in their past, like urinating in public or the such, so why are you picking on the poor gang?


2 posted on 04/26/2006 3:03:20 PM PDT by old and cranky (You! Out Of The Gene Pool - Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: old and cranky

LMAO


3 posted on 04/26/2006 7:43:52 PM PDT by Dr.Syn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Syn

Why didn't Dan Sarge document any of the Las Vegas events that occurred? Bloggers have to give their sources if they want to be taken seriously.


4 posted on 04/28/2006 4:52:42 AM PDT by TaxRelief (Wal-Mart: Keeping my family on-budget since 1993.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
Probably because he learned that editorials aren't footnoted but since you asked:

http://www.klastv.com/global/story.asp?s=4819138&ClientType=Printable

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/LegalCenter/story?id=1882724

5 posted on 04/28/2006 5:37:19 AM PDT by Dr.Syn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Syn

For clarity to the reader, editorials need to contain links or have footnotes when referring to events or statements of fact.

This is one of the problems that is behind the MSM's ongoing loss of market share. If bloggers and counter-media publications start adopting the same "sources-on-file-only" techniques, they too will lose market share once the thrill wears off.

Americans are a savvy bunch. The general population views all undocumented claims with suspicion, and the average time-restricted Joe will choose to drop a blog or news source that forces him to yahoo! search every statement in the article. JMHO.

The most popular blogs link everything ad-nauseum.

Thanks for the links. They were helpful.


6 posted on 04/28/2006 6:54:59 AM PDT by TaxRelief (Wal-Mart: Keeping my family on-budget since 1993.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson