Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush slammed for charging Hu protester
WORLDNETDAILY.COM ^ | April 25, 2006 | unknown

Posted on 04/25/2006 2:14:59 PM PDT by ovrtaxt

Bush slammed for charging Hu protester

Pastors: Administration 'hypocritical' for throwing book at woman


Posted: April 25, 2006
5:00 p.m. Eastern


© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com

Some Christian leaders are protesting the Bush administration decision to seek up to six months in federal prison for Wenyi Wang, the woman who shouted at the president and Chinese leader Hu Jintao at the White House last week.

At the event, Wang, who got access to the White House grounds as a media representative with a Chinese opposition paper, shouted, "President Bush, stop him (President Hu) from persecuting Falun Gong" and "President Bush, stop him from killing."

In Chinese, the woman shouted, "President Hu, your days are numbered."

Tomorrow morning, representatives from the Christian Defense Coalition and the National Clergy Council will hold a news conferences at Georgetown University that coincides with a conference on religious freedom and tolerance there.

"We are extremely disappointed that the Bush administration is bringing charges against Dr. Wenyi Wang that may result in her spending six months in federal prison," said the Rev. Patrick J. Mahoney, director of the Christian Defense Coalition, in a statement.

"Her crime? Shouting out for President Bush to help stop the killing and religious persecution of Falun Gong. We believe these federal charges are sending a horrible message to the worldwide community concerning America's commitment to protecting religious freedom and liberties.

"It seems extremely hypocritical for the White House to roll out the red carpet for a world leader whose government supports the trampling and crushing of human rights. And, at the same time pursue prison time for a women fighting to end religious persecution and violence. Our message is clear: President Bush, support religious freedom and the First Amendment, and drop all charges against Dr. Wang."

Commented the Rev. Rob Schenck, president of the National Clergy Council: "With all due respect to President Bush, this incident demands leniency. This is an extraordinary case. Wenyi Wang was persecuted by one of the last totalitarian communist regimes left on Earth. Communist China is an enemy of the United States, and Hu Jintao embodies one of the worst, most abusive and morally bankrupt regimes in the history of the human race. Wenyi Wang had proper press credentials to be where she was. Her only crime was to interrupt Chinese President Hu Jintao, the chief of this illegitimate, murderous, repressive and repugnant government.

"The Catholic, Evangelical, Orthodox and Protestant church leaders of the National Clergy Council appeal to President Bush and federal prosecutors to drop these charges. The president should reinforce the inalienable God-give rights of Wenyi Wang, not accommodate the harsh ego of a cruel dictator."

After emerging from a hearing at U.S. district court in Washington Friday, Wang said of her act: "It's not a crime but an act of civil disobedience."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; china; hu; huvisit; wang
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last
To: ovrtaxt
Tomorrow's Headline:

Democrats call on President Bush to pardon Wenyi Wang!
...question her charges.

41 posted on 04/25/2006 2:38:25 PM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
You have to 'save face' see. Free speech and save face are diametrically opposed.

And, in our "land of the tolerant and home of the multicultural", its vital that we toss our precious liberties at the first sign of discomfort from a communist dictator.

42 posted on 04/25/2006 2:38:35 PM PDT by TChris ("Wake up, America. This is serious." - Ben Stein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

it's the other way around, but I'll let you slide since you don't know the difference.


43 posted on 04/25/2006 2:38:54 PM PDT by jw777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
She is being charged with breaking laws.

Breaking what law? She was given press credentials. She went to a microphone open for journalists. Rather than ask a question, she made a statement.

What law did she break? Embarrassing the President? Embarrassing a foreign dignitary?
44 posted on 04/25/2006 2:40:48 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ishabibble
The woman was wrong...

What law did she violate?

45 posted on 04/25/2006 2:41:34 PM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: jw777

lol thanks. I'll let the history and the reader decide...


46 posted on 04/25/2006 2:41:36 PM PDT by ovrtaxt (My donation to the GOP went here instead: http://www.minutemanhq.com/hq/index.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

The Law Decides.


47 posted on 04/25/2006 2:43:03 PM PDT by jw777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

"I think it's time to stop picking and choosing who should be prosecuted and who shouldn't. If a law is wrong, change it."

Well how do you explain Bush's postion on illegal immigrants? How is that they can break the law but ol Bushy never mentions that? They are only immigrants like you and me not lawbreakers, right?

Its disgusting that they would charge this woman. Bush is really showing the leftest that he is. Im sure there will be more to come.


48 posted on 04/25/2006 2:44:24 PM PDT by sasafras ("Licentiousness destroyes order, and when chaos ensues, the yearning for order will destroy freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
Title 18 USC, Sec. 112. Protection of foreign officials, official guests, and internationally protected persons is the statute most frequently being discussed with regards to this incident. It's noteworthy that the very statute includes the verbiage:

(d) Nothing contained in this section shall be construed or applied so as to abridge the exercise of rights guaranteed under the first amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

49 posted on 04/25/2006 2:44:43 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Yep we sure live in a Free Country. Every Foreigner on the Planet can have free expression here, have the red carpet thrown out for them, be given jobs, free health and dental care, welfare, what have you.

Let one Citizen say something not politically correct and god help you arse.

This is NOT the America I remember and it damn sure isn't the America I want to die in.

Whoever made this decision to prosecute this woman should him or herself be thrown into jail for gross stupidity.


50 posted on 04/25/2006 2:45:09 PM PDT by Leatherneck_MT (An honest man can feel no pleasure in the exercise of power over his fellow citizens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
President Bush is the one pursuing charges against her? Not the law enforcement officers of the jurisdiction in which she allegedly broke a law?
51 posted on 04/25/2006 2:45:20 PM PDT by msnimje (Illegals to US CITIZENS .... "You Suck.......Now pass the mash potatoes!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jw777

Certainly he could suggest that they not.
susie


52 posted on 04/25/2006 2:45:44 PM PDT by brytlea (amnesty--an act of clemency by an authority by which pardon is granted esp. to a group of individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jw777

Ask the Founding Fathers about that. Or ML King for that matter.


53 posted on 04/25/2006 2:46:18 PM PDT by ovrtaxt (My donation to the GOP went here instead: http://www.minutemanhq.com/hq/index.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

sweet!


54 posted on 04/25/2006 2:46:48 PM PDT by ovrtaxt (My donation to the GOP went here instead: http://www.minutemanhq.com/hq/index.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: inquest
Bush has the power to call off the prosecution with little more than a snap of his fingers...

He most certainly CAN NOT! That may be how it works in China but in this country no man, not even the president, is above the law.

That is why people in the family of presidents are charged with crimes if they break the law.
55 posted on 04/25/2006 2:47:44 PM PDT by msnimje (Illegals to US CITIZENS .... "You Suck.......Now pass the mash potatoes!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Yeah, but THOSE protestors were hispanic. BIG difference it seems.


56 posted on 04/25/2006 2:48:13 PM PDT by abigailsmybaby ("This is the sort of English up with which I will not put." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TChris

You know, you folks are right. This lady should not be punished for interrupting an official state visit and disrupting the speech of the president and Commie Hu. Never mind she had a press pass, meaning she was authorized to cover the event, not participate in it. She has First Amendment rights.

Of course, next time the President wants to speak somewhere, he should just let his opponents take the stage or speak over him. And when he gives his next state of the union address, it isn't important that he be heard, just let the dems shout him down. Maybe Cindy Sheehand could bring her bullhorn and drown out the president.

Or, next time a college group gets permission to put up an anti-abortion display, please don't deny a professor's right to trash the display so she can exercise her First Amendment rights.

/sarcasm


57 posted on 04/25/2006 2:50:07 PM PDT by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jw777

I may be confused, but didn't you say Alberto Gonzales?


58 posted on 04/25/2006 2:50:20 PM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

Thank you for that.
susie


59 posted on 04/25/2006 2:51:14 PM PDT by brytlea (amnesty--an act of clemency by an authority by which pardon is granted esp. to a group of individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: sasafras
Well how do you explain Bush's postion on illegal immigrants?

I'm not trying to explain anything about illegal immigration or whether this woman broke a law. I'm merely saying the laws on the books should be enforced, all laws. I believe there are laws about illegal immigrants that are not being enforced but I'm not arguing it.

j

60 posted on 04/25/2006 2:52:10 PM PDT by jazusamo (-- Married a WAC in '65 and I'm still reenlisting. :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson