Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush slammed for charging Hu protester
WORLDNETDAILY.COM ^ | April 25, 2006 | unknown

Posted on 04/25/2006 2:14:59 PM PDT by ovrtaxt

Bush slammed for charging Hu protester

Pastors: Administration 'hypocritical' for throwing book at woman


Posted: April 25, 2006
5:00 p.m. Eastern


© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com

Some Christian leaders are protesting the Bush administration decision to seek up to six months in federal prison for Wenyi Wang, the woman who shouted at the president and Chinese leader Hu Jintao at the White House last week.

At the event, Wang, who got access to the White House grounds as a media representative with a Chinese opposition paper, shouted, "President Bush, stop him (President Hu) from persecuting Falun Gong" and "President Bush, stop him from killing."

In Chinese, the woman shouted, "President Hu, your days are numbered."

Tomorrow morning, representatives from the Christian Defense Coalition and the National Clergy Council will hold a news conferences at Georgetown University that coincides with a conference on religious freedom and tolerance there.

"We are extremely disappointed that the Bush administration is bringing charges against Dr. Wenyi Wang that may result in her spending six months in federal prison," said the Rev. Patrick J. Mahoney, director of the Christian Defense Coalition, in a statement.

"Her crime? Shouting out for President Bush to help stop the killing and religious persecution of Falun Gong. We believe these federal charges are sending a horrible message to the worldwide community concerning America's commitment to protecting religious freedom and liberties.

"It seems extremely hypocritical for the White House to roll out the red carpet for a world leader whose government supports the trampling and crushing of human rights. And, at the same time pursue prison time for a women fighting to end religious persecution and violence. Our message is clear: President Bush, support religious freedom and the First Amendment, and drop all charges against Dr. Wang."

Commented the Rev. Rob Schenck, president of the National Clergy Council: "With all due respect to President Bush, this incident demands leniency. This is an extraordinary case. Wenyi Wang was persecuted by one of the last totalitarian communist regimes left on Earth. Communist China is an enemy of the United States, and Hu Jintao embodies one of the worst, most abusive and morally bankrupt regimes in the history of the human race. Wenyi Wang had proper press credentials to be where she was. Her only crime was to interrupt Chinese President Hu Jintao, the chief of this illegitimate, murderous, repressive and repugnant government.

"The Catholic, Evangelical, Orthodox and Protestant church leaders of the National Clergy Council appeal to President Bush and federal prosecutors to drop these charges. The president should reinforce the inalienable God-give rights of Wenyi Wang, not accommodate the harsh ego of a cruel dictator."

After emerging from a hearing at U.S. district court in Washington Friday, Wang said of her act: "It's not a crime but an act of civil disobedience."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; china; hu; huvisit; wang
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last
To: jw777

You know exactly what response you're going to get. Stop trying to defend the indefensible.


21 posted on 04/25/2006 2:30:36 PM PDT by ovrtaxt (My donation to the GOP went here instead: http://www.minutemanhq.com/hq/index.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
We are no better than the communists if we prosecute this woman for her voice. I don't care what cult she belongs to, it is BS that we deny freedom of speech when it comes to foreign dictators. Congress shall make no law blah blah blah.
22 posted on 04/25/2006 2:31:01 PM PDT by satchmodog9 (Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
I don't know that this lady broke the law but if she did I believe she should be prosecuted like any other lawbreaker should be. I think it's time to stop picking and choosing who should be prosecuted and who shouldn't. If a law is wrong, change it.

j

23 posted on 04/25/2006 2:31:04 PM PDT by jazusamo (-- Married a WAC in '65 and I'm still reenlisting. :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Didn't you know? The First Amendment is suspended when commies are visiting.


24 posted on 04/25/2006 2:31:34 PM PDT by TChris ("Wake up, America. This is serious." - Ben Stein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

You're kidding right?

EVer hear of the FIRST AMENDMENT????


25 posted on 04/25/2006 2:32:05 PM PDT by ovrtaxt (My donation to the GOP went here instead: http://www.minutemanhq.com/hq/index.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TChris

You have to 'save face' see. Free speech and save face are diametrically opposed.


26 posted on 04/25/2006 2:33:32 PM PDT by ovrtaxt (My donation to the GOP went here instead: http://www.minutemanhq.com/hq/index.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
There's no way W. will allow Wenyi Wang to be prosecuted or held for any length of time. She said much of what he probably wanted to be said against the illegitimate communist/totalitarian regime currently occupying China.

It's encouraging that she spoke for so long to that audience.

27 posted on 04/25/2006 2:33:36 PM PDT by ProCivitas (Qui bono? Quo warranto? ; Who benefits? By what right/authority ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Thats my point exactly. We let this ugly Mofro Sheehan get away and prosecute this lady. It just aint right.


28 posted on 04/25/2006 2:33:49 PM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

If this is true it is damning.


29 posted on 04/25/2006 2:34:32 PM PDT by mthom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
It will probably all just fade away, IF it is handled discreetly. The woman was wrong, Commie Hu even more wrong to honor creepy Gates before meeting with the POTUS, but there is no way this woman will see any jail time for a internationally televised faux pas. Who is the only person who wants this to go away more than the protester?
George W. Bush.

p.s. I don't think the woman is wrong in her passion. Those evil Commies are killing people for profit, and that isn't going to stand for long with a Bush White House. The more information that comes out of Communist China, the more they will have to give concessions to the West.
30 posted on 04/25/2006 2:34:57 PM PDT by ishabibble (UNITED WE STAND DIVIDED WE FALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

I agree. I have read an excerpt of the relevant statute and doubt that it applies to mere loud speech directed at a foreign official in public. This is core first amendment.


31 posted on 04/25/2006 2:35:49 PM PDT by Elpasser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: jw777

So do you hold the President responsible for the actions of his staff?


32 posted on 04/25/2006 2:35:56 PM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
EVer hear of the FIRST AMENDMENT????

wasnt that some rule about 50 yrs ago where people had freedom of speech ?

thats way back, when people actually had guns in thier houses

33 posted on 04/25/2006 2:36:13 PM PDT by Revelation 911 (God is love, Love endures forever, Love God, Love your neighbor,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

This is an emotional argument. She is being charged with breaking laws. Either she broke them or she didn't. That's what a court will decide. I think she personally threatened a head of state and think she should be held accountable for that. Whether it is for a good cause or not is irrevelant.


34 posted on 04/25/2006 2:36:15 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Stop trying to indict someone who has nothing to do with it.


35 posted on 04/25/2006 2:36:24 PM PDT by jw777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Why is this protester being arrested and yet Mary O McCarthy is still free.

Who did the greater harm?


36 posted on 04/25/2006 2:36:47 PM PDT by Prost1 (Sandy Berger can steal, Clinton can cheat, but Bush can't listen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes

Tell me which staff member is charging her!


37 posted on 04/25/2006 2:37:12 PM PDT by jw777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ishabibble
It will probably all just fade away, IF it is handled discreetly.

Why should it have to be handled discreetly? That is diametrically counter to the foundation of this Nation.
38 posted on 04/25/2006 2:37:33 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: jw777

weak. you're embarrassing yourself.


39 posted on 04/25/2006 2:38:08 PM PDT by ovrtaxt (My donation to the GOP went here instead: http://www.minutemanhq.com/hq/index.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
You're kidding right?

Nope, not kidding. If she broke a law, which I don't know if she did, she should be prosecuted. If we have a law that is contrary to the First Amendment, it's unconstitutional and should be thrown out.

j

40 posted on 04/25/2006 2:38:21 PM PDT by jazusamo (-- Married a WAC in '65 and I'm still reenlisting. :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson