Posted on 04/25/2006 6:50:43 AM PDT by demkicker
A terrorism symposium featuring leading experts will begin with presentation of "tangible proof" al-Qaida not only has developed an arsenal of tactical nuclear weapons but also has begun to deploy them for use in its jihad against the United States and Israel.
Paul L. Williams, author of "The Al Connection" and "The Dunces of Doomsday," will present his findings at the National Press Club in Washington at the conclusion of a public debate with Wall Street Journal correspondent Richard Miniter on al-Qaida's nuclear weaponry.
The debate, Friday at 10 a.m., will be moderated by Fred Barnes, executive editor of The Weekly Standard and regular contributor to the Fox News Channel. The public is invited to attend.
The organizers say the event is timely, "with increased anxiety over demands for a pullout from Iraq, the nuclear developments in Iran and North Korea, the failure of our government to secure the borders and our country's fledgling, incomprehensive effort at homeland security."
Epstein believes the majority of Americans disapprove of both the "cut-and-run policy" proposed by many leading Democrats and the "compassionate conservative" approach of the Bush administration, favoring instead a "firm and decisive military action with no apologies to Russia, China, France, Germany, Saudi Arabia or the United Nations."
"I am convinced that the threat we are currently facing from radical Islam greatly surpasses that which was posed by the Third Reich," Epstein said.
Anyone interested in attending, Epstein added, should contact America's Truth Forum at its website or by calling 866-709-3474.
The event offers the following speakers (continued):
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Wow, now you are in the beautiful frame business!
listen for the umpteenth time, I am not arguing for suitcase nukes!
I am trying to say sucinctly that Al-Queda will use small low yield nuclear weapons, as soon as they have them and as soon as it meets their strategic needs. This is as soon as they have more than I.
I live near Chicago and suburbs, for the last 50 or so years.
Do you know how many COSCO and HANJIN and other foreign port sea containers, from all ofver the world, come into the downtown (loop) area per year. It has to be thousands. Do you know how many are inspected - NONE.
Let us all give the suitcase nuke argument a rest. A sea container can hold what? 10,000#? 10,00# buys a lot of shielding.
Lurking'
listen for the umpteenth time, I am not arguing for suitcase nukes!
I am trying to say sucinctly that Al-Queda will use small low yield nuclear weapons, as soon as they have them and as soon as it meets their strategic needs. This is as soon as they have more than I.
I live near Chicago and suburbs, for the last 50 or so years.
Do you know how many COSCO and HANJIN and other foreign port sea containers, from all ofver the world, come into the downtown (loop) area per year. It has to be thousands. Do you know how many are inspected - NONE.
Let us all give the suitcase nuke argument a rest. A sea container can hold what? 10,000#? 10,00# buys a lot of shielding.
Lurking'
"Our foes are already there. They want things that way - more primitive, if possible.
If they are allowed to win, we're looking at a new Dark Age."
Revelations says that 3 billion people die during this last great war. 200 million total troops will fight the war. The good news is that the good guys win in the end and we have 1,000 year peaceful time under Christ. I am not one of those religious types either to think lightning bolts will come down to earth from God's finger, but rather this will be fought on earth good vs. bad. The 1,000 years will be a time of scientific discovery. My belief is that this war will be so bad that countries will decide building such arms ever again should not even be considered.
Exactly. It's not as if he can go back to the seller afterwards and say, "Hey, this thing was a dud, I'm gonna sue!"
Whatever it is, we are fools not to seriously consider dropping the hammer on this nut in Iran.
I heard either Savage or someone else the other day playing a clip from Youtube of some of these Islamic crazies screaming Allah Akhbar while killing our Troops. It was really crazy, the frenzied voices.
They, and their religion, are the enemy. Sure many of its followers are peaceful, but it is not a coincidence that since they have been a major religion they have barely ever had a time without bloody conflict.
You're still arguing for nuclear weapons that require periodic maintenance. That stands whether or not they're "suitcase nukes."
I am trying to say sucinctly that Al-Queda will use small low yield nuclear weapons, as soon as they have them and as soon as it meets their strategic needs. This is as soon as they have more than I.
Who would give them nuclear weapons? With what motivation? Al-Qaeda pretty much reviles everyone but themselves as "infidels." I don't know about you, but I'm not stupid enough to hand a lethal weapon over to someone who wants to see me dead.
Do you know how many COSCO and HANJIN and other foreign port sea containers, from all ofver the world, come into the downtown (loop) area per year. It has to be thousands. Do you know how many are inspected - NONE.
If, by "inspected," you mean "physically opened," it's about 5%.
However, the containers are 100% checked for radiation with extremely sensitive equipment (see below).
Let us all give the suitcase nuke argument a rest. A sea container can hold what? 10,000#? 10,00# buys a lot of shielding.
Unfortunately, the shielding necessary to evade modern detection devices is going to be well over that figure. There have been radiation alarms set off by shipments of floor tile, for God's sake!
Still, I'd love to see what Paul Williams considers to be "tangible proof" that Al-Qaeda has nukes.
I don't think that "tangible proof" means what he thinks it means.
let's face it we are going to disagree.
Plan according to your own conclusions.
No skin off mine.
Lurking'
Thursday. Friday is qualifying...
The proof, I believe, will be something very similar to that movie Sum of All Fears.
"Three or four tactical nukes set off one day (one week, etc)at a time would effectively end the US as we know it.
Never underestimate the enemy."
And ten in the ten industrial cities would cause world chaos. The US would be forced to nuke every islam country to green glass.
We have a freeper speaking at the event too. Laura Mansfield is freeper StillProud2befree
The event offers the following speakers:
* James Woolsey, who previously held presidential appointments in two Democratic and two Republican administrations, served as the director of the Central Intelligence Agency from 1993 to 1995.
* Kenneth Timmerman, author of "Countdown to Crisis: the Coming Nuclear Showdown with Iran," has been nominated for the 2006 Nobel Peace Prize.
* Daniel Pipes, director of the Middle East Forum and a prize-winning columnist for the New York Sun and The Jerusalem Post. Pipes was one of the few analysts who warned of the threat of radical Islam to the U.S. before 9-11, writing in 1995, "war has been unilaterally declared on Europe and the United States." The Boston Globe stated, "If Pipes's admonitions had been heeded, there might never have been a 9-11."
* Robert Spencer, director of the weblog Jihad Watch, is an author and researcher who has studied Islam for more than 20 years. His book "The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (And The Crusades)" spent four months on the New York Times best-seller list. Spencer is an adjunct fellow with the Free Congress Foundation and has written a selection of critically acclaimed books on Islam. He has appeared on CNN and Fox News and has been heard on Vatican Radio.
* David Horowitz, president of the Center for the Study of Popular Culture is the author of "Unholy Alliance," which contends America's Left is giving aid and comfort to its enemies in the terror war, and "The Professors: The 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America."
* Richard Miniter, author of two New York Times best-selling books, "Losing Bin Laden" and "Shadow War," and an internationally recognized expert on terrorism.
* Walid Phares, a senior fellow with the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, professor of Middle East Studies and author of several books on Middle Eastern affairs including the most recent "Future Jihad: Terrorist Strategies Against America." Phares' research and analysis of the Jihadi ideology, strategies and movements goes back to the early 1980s. He conducts briefings to governments, international organizations and appears frequently in the media. Phares is called by many as "the one expert who understands the minds of Jihadists best."
* Walid Shoebat, a former Palestinian Liberation Organization terrorist, converted to Christianity and now warns of the imminent threat of radical Islam to Western civilization.
* Harvey Kushner, noted author, lecturer, professor and internationally recognized authority on terrorism. Kushner has advised and provided training to numerous agencies, including the FBI, FAA, INS and U.S. Customs. He is a frequent guest of all major television networks and often is quoted by news media worldwide.
* Dr. Andrew Bostom, editor of the newly released book "The Legacy of Jihad," a compendium of writings, both modern and ancient, on the uniquely Islamic institution of jihad. Bostom is a physician specializing in epidemiology. Since 1997 he has been part of the full-time medical faculty at two hospital affiliates of Brown University.
* Bruce Tefft, founding member of the CIA's Counter Terrorism Center, has trained more than 12,000 law enforcement officers and first responders and has served as the New York Police Department's counter-terrorism and intelligence adviser since 9-11.
* Brigitte Gabriel, a former anchor for world news in the Middle East and a prominent Arab-American journalist, survived a bombing in which her family's home was reduced to rubble by radical Muslim forces.
* Laura Mansfield, an author and counter-terror analyst, uses her knowledge of the Arabic language and Islamic culture to investigate jihad and jihadis in the U.S. and abroad.
* Joe Kaufman, chairman of Americans Against Hate. He also is an investigative journalist for Frontpage Magazine and host of "The Politics of Terrorism" radio show.
* Paul Williams, award-winning journalist and author of "Al Qaeda Connection," "Osama's Revenge: The Next 9/11," and "The Dunces of Doomsday," has served as a consultant for the FBI, editor, adjunct professor of humanities at the University of Scranton and correspondent for WorldNetDaily.
We would not do it. The liberals and panzies would be screaming that we would only be killing innocents and that nothing would be gained, count on it.
Sounds awesome!
StillProud2befree said this may be taped; so we may be able to watch it. She is verifying.
The first airplane hijacked to Cuba was in 1958. I don't think 9/11 was a significant technological advance.
"We would not do it. The liberals and panzies would be screaming that we would only be killing innocents and that nothing would be gained, count on it."
Dirty bombs in 10 major cities could kill upwards of 30,000,000 Americans (mostly blue staters). If a dem balked at retaliation, I would shoot the MF myself! I promise!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.