Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[...} fired Mary McCarthy ‘CATEGORICALLY DENIES’ being the source of the leak on agency renditions.
msnbc/ Newsweek ^ | April 24, 2006 | Mark Hosenball and Michael Isikoff

Posted on 04/24/2006 3:03:57 PM PDT by Roscoe Karns

WEB EXCLUSIVE

By Mark Hosenball and Michael Isikoff

Updated: 5:43 p.m. ET April 24, 2006

April 24, 2006 - A former CIA officer who was sacked last week after allegedly confessing to leaking secrets has denied she was the source of a controversial Washington Post story about alleged CIA secret detention operations in Eastern Europe, a friend of the operative told NEWSWEEK.

The fired official, Mary O. McCarthy, “categorically denies being the source of the leak,” one of McCarthy’s friends and former colleagues, Rand Beers, said Monday after speaking to McCarthy. Beers said he could not elaborate on this denial and McCarthy herself did not respond to a request for comment left by NEWSWEEK on her home answering machine. A national security advisor to Democratic Party candidate John Kerry during the 2004 presidential campaign, Beers worked as the head of intelligence programs on President Bill Clinton’s National Security Council staff and later served as a top deputy on counter-terrorism for President Bush in 2002 and 2003. McCarthy, a career CIA analyst, initially worked as a deputy to Beers on the NSC and later took over Beer’s role as the Clinton NSC’s top intelligence expert.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: barfalert; cia; clintonsfinest; democrattool; denial; isikoff; kerrydirtytricks; kerrysbest; leaks; liar; marymccarthy; pigsstartsqueeling; randbeers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-362 next last
To: Gaffer
Yeap I have been keeping up on the different threads regarding the leaks.

Looks like she is going to take people down with her when she goes.

21 posted on 04/24/2006 3:10:02 PM PDT by mware (American's in armchairs doing the job of the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe Karns

I guess she's not the noble whistle-blower the MSM tried to make of her.


22 posted on 04/24/2006 3:10:03 PM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Howlin I read that she admitted to being the source to some journalist, prior to being escorted off the property and losing her clearance.
23 posted on 04/24/2006 3:12:16 PM PDT by mware (American's in armchairs doing the job of the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
"Am I wrong, did she NOT confess?"

To a different leak.

24 posted on 04/24/2006 3:12:37 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe Karns

And the Drive-by-Spin starts...

Can't prosecute because of 5th amendment rights...

What they can do is take her clearance and probably deny her pension.

And they know of NUMEROUS UNLAWFUL meetings and disclosures.
Where does the trail lead?


25 posted on 04/24/2006 3:13:32 PM PDT by Prost1 (Sandy Berger can steal, Clinton can cheat, but Bush can't listen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

If he contacted her I'm sure it wasn't to offer moral support. I'm sure he needed to know what's she's said and to give her a "subtle" suggestion to clam up.


26 posted on 04/24/2006 3:13:57 PM PDT by surrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mware
Looks like she is going to take people down with her when she goes.

Lord, let it be so!

It might just start waking up even some libs - nah.

But it might get some of the short attention spanned, one "MINE" issue conservatives to pause and realize we have a lot going on here that is crucial to the very survival of a free US - which mean a free world

27 posted on 04/24/2006 3:14:03 PM PDT by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time," Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: mware
It is a criminal case. A major felony case. Of course the evil b*tch is denying it. I am sure Hillary has lined up a top legal team for her girl Mary's defense.

Just part of Hillary's criminal gang.


28 posted on 04/24/2006 3:14:21 PM PDT by FormerACLUmember (No program, no ideas, no clue: The democrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe Karns
I never have fully understood what 'categorically' deny means.

It sounds too much like a Clintonesque parsing or Kerryite nuancing.
29 posted on 04/24/2006 3:14:29 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Help me out here, I thought she confessed on the Dana Priest story.......did she not? If not, what DID she confess to?


30 posted on 04/24/2006 3:14:43 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: mware
and losing her clearance

for 3 years maybe? >sarc

31 posted on 04/24/2006 3:15:12 PM PDT by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time," Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: surrey

We really shouldn't be so hard on her; this is probably her first leak, after all.


WHY ISN'T SHE IN JAIL?????


32 posted on 04/24/2006 3:15:50 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Prost1
Prost.. she did sign that documents regarding not releasing classified documents.

Seems to me they can get her on that. It must be a felony.

33 posted on 04/24/2006 3:15:57 PM PDT by mware (American's in armchairs doing the job of the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; gaspar

I see this is another Isikoff piece.


34 posted on 04/24/2006 3:16:20 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe Karns

This is positively Kerryesque:

She confessed to being the leaker before she denied it.

Typical treasonous 'Rat-b@$tard.


35 posted on 04/24/2006 3:17:17 PM PDT by mkjessup (The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe Karns

After reading this article I feel like I've taken a ride on a gyroscope -- it's all spin.


36 posted on 04/24/2006 3:17:22 PM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe Karns

It is not surprising that Michael Isikoff is helping to circle the wagons in McCarthy's defense. By the end of the week he and others will probably be campaigning for her to get her job back.


37 posted on 04/24/2006 3:17:30 PM PDT by jazusamo (-- Married a WAC in '65 and I'm still reenlisting. :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
"Help me out here, I thought she confessed on the Dana Priest story.......did she not? If not, what DID she confess to?"

Dana Priest has done more than one leak story on more than one topic, and will do more (at least, until more of the rot inside the CIA has been cleared out).

38 posted on 04/24/2006 3:17:34 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

There was a former CIA guy on with John Gibson who wanted the same answer.


39 posted on 04/24/2006 3:17:50 PM PDT by surrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: surrey
If he contacted her I'm sure it wasn't to offer moral support. I'm sure he needed to know what's she's said and to give her a "subtle" suggestion to clam up.

Which is why her hiney should have been immediately hauled off the to hoosegow....where the spin meisters and dead fish deliverers couldn't get to her...then she'd be more likely to spill her rotten, traitorous guts

40 posted on 04/24/2006 3:18:12 PM PDT by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time," Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-362 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson