Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Three Dollar Gasoline: an Opportunity, Not a Crisis
The American Thinker ^ | April 24, 2006 | Christopher Chantrill

Posted on 04/24/2006 9:03:21 AM PDT by oldtimer2

Three Dollar Gasoline: an Opportunity, Not a Crisis, April 24th, 2006

Some observers think that President Bush's dismal job approval rating is not about the mess in Iraq. It is not about the shocking corruption of the Republican Congress. It is not even about President Bush's failure to prevent Hurricane Katrina. It reflects Americans' rage at $3.00 per gallon gasoline.

How can you pursue happiness in that mammoth Ford Expedition with heated leather seats if your gas bill starts competing with your mortgage payment?

Democrats have suddenly discovered that they are shocked (shocked!) by high gas prices. The New York Times reports that

Democrats running for Congress are moving quickly to use the most recent surge in oil and gasoline prices to bash Republicans over energy policy.

Oh really?

o This is the party that stopped the nation building nuclear plants.

o This is the party that toyed with carbon taxes.

o This is the party of Al Gore, now right in the middle of publicizing An Inconvenient Truth, by far the most terrifying movie you will ever see.

o This is the party that won't let oil companies prospect for oil off the left and right coasts.

o This is the party whose activists prevented the US from building new petroleum refineries.

o This is the party that filibusters against drilling for oil in an arctic wilderness that just happens to be right next to a major oil pipeline with spare capacity.

And now Democrats are bashing Republicans over energy policy?

Yes, and Republicans better get out in front of them before $3.00 gasoline and An Inconvenient Truth brew up a perfect storm and blow the nation into an eco-Marshall Plan to increase energy taxes and throw subsidies at a daunting array of environmentalist pet projects from wind farms to biodiesel.

Read Al Gore's article in Vanity Fair to understand just how terrified you should be. After reciting the usual catalog of climate changes, he warns of the 10,000 foot mound of ice on top of Greenland that would, if it melted or broken up, raise the sea level worldwide by more than 20 feet. In the face of all this, why is it that our leaders seem not to hear such clarion warnings? Maybe, Al, it because they don't just listen to eco-alarmists like you but also contrarian ideas like the theory of the University of Virginia's Bill Ruddiman that global warming from agriculture has already staved off the next ice age.

Al Gore reminds us that The Chinese expression for crisis consists of two characters:

The first is a symbol for danger

the second is a symbol for opportunity.

He is a politician and he would know. It is when they feel danger that the people rise up and demand that the politicians "do something." For a brief window of opportunity the special interest blocking forces are weakened as the people demand that the politicians lead them to safety.

All the stars are in alignment. Americans are angry as they shovel out $80 to fill up their SUVs. The Democrats are hypocritically on the attack, threatening to get to the right of the president; the mainstream media is baying for blood, shoveling anecdotal stories of helpless consumers ruined by high gas prices.

Usually economic "crises" are bad news because they provide an excuse for the politicians to do something stupid like impose price controls or prop up failing corporations. But not this one. Not if the president and the Congressional leadership can rouse themselves from their torpor. Not if they can bestir themselves to do something more than stand foursquare against "price gouging."

o Now is the time to demand that Congress passes a decent energy bill.

o Now is the chance to demand that we build some more oil refineries.

o Now is the chance to drill for oil in ANWR.

o Now is the chance to search for oil on the continental shelf off the west and east coasts.

o Now is the chance to rationalize the crazy quilt of gasolines blended for each individual city.

Of course the Democrats are demagoguing on energy. They demagogue on everything.

Some day, in a quieter, more reflective time, there will be an opportunity to conduct a scholarly study to determine whether the Democrats of the twenty-first century actually believed in anything other than temporary partisan advantage. But this is not that time.

Now is the time to call the Democrats' bluff on energy, not to mention border security, Iraq, and taxes. Is anyone paying attention? At the White House? Mr. President? Karl Rove? On Capitol Hill? Denny Hastert?

Nothing personal, you understand. It's just that when we read in Time that the White House's five point plan to save the Bush presidency doesnft include a bullet point for high gas prices, we begin to wonder if anyone is home.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com. His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gasprices
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last
I sometimes feel like Casey Stengel, When he was manager of the New York Mets, in their first year. While watching the collection of cast off, has beens and never would bees, cried out "Can't anyone here play this game?'
1 posted on 04/24/2006 9:03:22 AM PDT by oldtimer2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: oldtimer2
Democrats running for Congress are moving quickly to use the most recent surge in oil and gasoline prices to bash Republicans over energy policy.

And many Freerepublic posters too.

2 posted on 04/24/2006 9:05:54 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldtimer2

>>Now is the time to call the Democrats' bluff on energy, not to mention border security, Iraq, and taxes. Is anyone paying attention? At the White House? Mr. President? Karl Rove? On Capitol Hill? Denny Hastert?<<

What, Republicans criticize their opponents? That would require a rigid spine, not something we are likely to see from the current bunch we've elected.


3 posted on 04/24/2006 9:09:49 AM PDT by B4Ranch (Immigration Control and Border Security -The jobs George W. Bush doesn't want to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldtimer2

"I sometimes feel like Casey Stengel, When he was manager of the New York Mets, in their first year. While watching the collection of cast off, has beens and never would bees, cried out "Can't anyone here play this game?'

With regard to the Mets, the answer is still NO.


4 posted on 04/24/2006 9:10:51 AM PDT by BadAndy (Islam is a religion of submission. YOUR submission.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

The Clintons did more than "toy" with carbon taxes. Had it not been for one Democrat Party senator, David Boren of Oklahoma, we'd have a BTU tax on every level of energy.


5 posted on 04/24/2006 9:11:04 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

Yep, and you can count me among them. Republicans should be doing all the things this writer mentions. Instead they're cowering in the corner. If Republicans don't come out swinging soon on Immigration, energy, and refuting the "party of corruption" nonsense they can kiss the House and maybe the Senate goodbye.


6 posted on 04/24/2006 9:12:19 AM PDT by saganite (The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: oldtimer2

Two things that would help gas prices over the short term

1)Stop the sale of Domesitic Oil for Foreign Nations
2)Stop the sale of Domesictally Refined Gasoline to Foreign Nations

Long Term fixes
1)Drill everywhere, screw the whacko environmentalist
2)Build more refineries.
3)Build some freaking Nuclear Power Plants. Close all Oil Powered Power Plants.


7 posted on 04/24/2006 9:12:57 AM PDT by viper592
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

I don't know,,,

one just has to think that when a party controls the legislative and executive branches, that they might be able to tackle problems and win. Unfortunately the pubs scare too easily.


8 posted on 04/24/2006 9:13:40 AM PDT by tertiary01 (May 1st-- PINKO DE MAYO shop til you drop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: oldtimer2

--yes--and then there the Republidum geniuses like Arlen Spector who seem to be the only ones to know how to get headlines---


9 posted on 04/24/2006 9:13:43 AM PDT by rellimpank (Don't believe anything about firearms or explosives stated by the mass media---NRABenefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

Amen to that.


10 posted on 04/24/2006 9:13:46 AM PDT by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: oldtimer2
" It is not even about President Bush's failure to prevent Hurricane Katrina."

ROTFLMAO

11 posted on 04/24/2006 9:15:10 AM PDT by verity (The MSM is comprised of useless eaters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
I am a staunch Conservative, ( borderline Libertarian ) But what we need now is a LEADER and I don't see one.

What a shame, what a lost opportunity.

12 posted on 04/24/2006 9:15:42 AM PDT by BIGZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank
how to get headlines---

It is a shame that you have to spew a bunch of nonsense to get the headlines these days. Like Hilary's call to get the oil companies to pay for "research" into alternative fuels. How much does it cost to go to where it is commercially available here in the good old USA and ask them how they make it?
13 posted on 04/24/2006 9:19:23 AM PDT by P-40 (http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

Ok, you give me a 36 Billion dollar profit. Now you tell me I cannot spend it on doing things that will help me make more money.

Then you tell me that I am making too much money.

That is what happened to Exxon. They cannot use their profits for things like energy exploration or building refineries. They have a large pool of capital.

I guess giving 400 mil to a retiring President makes sense since there is nothing else they can do with thier money.


14 posted on 04/24/2006 9:20:36 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (To Serve Man......It's a cookbook!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: oldtimer2

bttt


15 posted on 04/24/2006 9:21:58 AM PDT by Christian4Bush (FreeRepublic and Rush Limbaugh: kevlar protection from the Drive-By Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldtimer2
Now is the chance to demand that we build some more oil refineries.

The other points are the proper domain of government-- basically de-regulation. This one makes no sense; there is nothing stopping any American with sufficient capital from building refineries right now... except lack of profitability and common sense... until the price of oil is sustained at a higher level, it will simply not be profitable for any capital holder to build and maintain an oil refinery, that is why no one is doing it. With supplies of "cheap" oil running scarce, what fool would build something that takes 20 years to pay for itself until he is quite confidant that demand and oil prices will stay high enough to justify it? What happens if alternate energy sources take off, who is going to pay for his losses?

16 posted on 04/24/2006 9:23:49 AM PDT by LambSlave (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BIGZ

Exactly, this country is in desperate need of a leader.


17 posted on 04/24/2006 9:27:22 AM PDT by Mel Gibson (Read the book, "Hatred's Kingdom" by Dore Gold)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LambSlave
one makes no sense; there is nothing stopping any American with sufficient capital from building refineries right now... except lack of profitability and common sense

Although you're right that return on investment is a critical part of the decision-making process, I don't believe the issue is the price of oil.

Older refineries are already profitable - there's no reason to believe a new, presumably more efficient, refinery would be profitable.

The key, though, is that to return the investment, the refinery has to actually operate.

When there's the very real possibility that some wacko environmental group will find a friendly judge to shut down the refinery (for whatever reason) as soon as its completed, no one's going to go ahead and make that multi-year, multi-$Billion investment. The risk of not being able to make it back is too great.
18 posted on 04/24/2006 9:29:49 AM PDT by CertainInalienableRights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: EQAndyBuzz

If they are stupid enough to come up with a "windfall" profit tax, we should force them to make it retroactive and pay fines and penalties. Guess who else would be paying a "profit" tax? Shareholders and mutual fund owners!! (The Teachers Union has alot of money invested in these funds through their retirement accounts)


20 posted on 04/24/2006 9:31:35 AM PDT by griswold3 (Ken Blackwell, Ohio Governor in 2006- No!! You cannot have my governor in 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson