Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HEMP FOR FUEL
ArtisticTreasure.com ^ | 04-23-2006 | Unknown

Posted on 04/23/2006 9:03:02 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
The hypocrisy of liberals and environmental groups, combined with globalist conspirators, Big Petroleum, and government law enforcement groups and bureaucrats, have turned a blind eye to the most feasible solution that could solve all of our energy woes.
1 posted on 04/23/2006 9:03:05 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Moonman62; Mojave; robertpaulsen

Hey drug warriors - what's your position on this? You can't get high off of industrial hemp - it is the equivalent of smoking a telephone pole. Should this product remain banned too?


2 posted on 04/23/2006 9:06:10 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Remove card rapidly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Why Hemp Fuel?

Why, of course...to 'Keep On Truckin.'

3 posted on 04/23/2006 9:06:18 PM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
It would only take 6% of our U.S. land to produce enough hemp, for hemp fuel, to make us energy independent from the rest of the world.

I have a friend, an engineer, that actually did the math--we would have to cover the US with hemp from sea to shining sea (including non-arable land) to meet our energy needs.

4 posted on 04/23/2006 9:06:27 PM PDT by randog (What the...?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Everytime I see this type of thing mentioned I remember an old Laugh-In "News of the Future" about President Ronald Reagan (considered funny, since he was only governor of California at the time. even funnier to me, since I saw this episode in '87 when he was president) deciding to do a trial run of marijuana as a fuel alternative. At last report it is unsure if it really made a difference in pollution, but no one really seemed to care.


5 posted on 04/23/2006 9:06:51 PM PDT by HungarianGypsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randog
I have a friend, an engineer, that actually did the math--we would have to cover the US with hemp from sea to shining sea (including non-arable land) to meet our energy needs.

I'm sure the author was talking about it in a gasoline context. Other energy for stationary establishments such as homes or businesses should come from nuclear power.

6 posted on 04/23/2006 9:07:43 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Remove card rapidly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Hemp isn't a good modern crop because it gums up processing machinery.


7 posted on 04/23/2006 9:07:48 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
Hemp isn't a good modern crop because it gums up processing machinery.

The author said it's more lubricating than petroleum. What machinery are you talking about? Factory or industrial equipment?

8 posted on 04/23/2006 9:09:16 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Remove card rapidly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: randog
...we would have to cover the US with hemp from sea to shining sea (including non-arable land) to meet our energy needs.

Far out

9 posted on 04/23/2006 9:10:14 PM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

10 posted on 04/23/2006 9:13:08 PM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (http://ntxsolutions.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Sounds like it's only being suggested for diesel replacement, not gasoline.


11 posted on 04/23/2006 9:14:36 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (The United 'Door Mats' of America! Go ahead, scrape your feet on it. Everyone else is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

It can also be used to make rope. You know... for that rope shortage... we have.


12 posted on 04/23/2006 9:17:15 PM PDT by CzarNicky (The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

I'm for hemp, bio-diesel, Wind turbines, solar PV cells, Hydro, and yes, even Nuclear.

IMHO People shouldn't focus on the "one magic bullet" to energy independence. We should bust our butts trying anything.

I'm also now pretty convinced that the Saudi oil pimps and the Texas oil pimps are not friends of the United States. I say screw them all.


13 posted on 04/23/2006 9:18:08 PM PDT by Will_Zurmacht
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Machinery used to process hemp. The government of Canada has studied the use of industrial hemp, and determined that it doesn't work well with modern processing methods. Also ask yourself why hemp isn't a big money maker where it's legal to grow.


14 posted on 04/23/2006 9:18:20 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Pathetic!


15 posted on 04/23/2006 9:19:48 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CzarNicky
It can also be used to make rope. You know... for that rope shortage... we have.

Ha! Exactly... Seems people want to go out of their way to find some reason to grow this stuff. "It can do anything!"

16 posted on 04/23/2006 9:20:02 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
I don't personally see anything wrong with Hemp. The good Lord gave it to us, IMHO we should smoke it... er I mean use it.
17 posted on 04/23/2006 9:20:23 PM PDT by Vote 4 Nixon (EAT...FISH...SLEEP...REDUX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

just an attempt by the pro-legalization crowd to latch on to the energy crisis to get their drugs legalized.


18 posted on 04/23/2006 9:21:33 PM PDT by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

The best crop for an alternative fuel has already been identified - switchgrass. Pres. Bush was ridiculed for including it in his SOTU address, but he is right. It traps the maximum amount of CO2 below ground, provides far more energy than corn above ground, and is environmentally friendly and costs less to grow. The only reason we don't use it now is corn subsidies have provided an over-capacity for corn (and an over-incentive to grow it).

And as far as I know, smoking it doesn't turn you into a lazy moron.


19 posted on 04/23/2006 9:23:12 PM PDT by KingKenrod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CzarNicky
You know... for that rope shortage... we have.

Cool...I've been looking for a rope salesman.

20 posted on 04/23/2006 9:23:18 PM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson