Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The hypocrisy of liberals and environmental groups, combined with globalist conspirators, Big Petroleum, and government law enforcement groups and bureaucrats, have turned a blind eye to the most feasible solution that could solve all of our energy woes.
1 posted on 04/23/2006 9:03:05 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Moonman62; Mojave; robertpaulsen

Hey drug warriors - what's your position on this? You can't get high off of industrial hemp - it is the equivalent of smoking a telephone pole. Should this product remain banned too?


2 posted on 04/23/2006 9:06:10 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Remove card rapidly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Why Hemp Fuel?

Why, of course...to 'Keep On Truckin.'

3 posted on 04/23/2006 9:06:18 PM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
It would only take 6% of our U.S. land to produce enough hemp, for hemp fuel, to make us energy independent from the rest of the world.

I have a friend, an engineer, that actually did the math--we would have to cover the US with hemp from sea to shining sea (including non-arable land) to meet our energy needs.

4 posted on 04/23/2006 9:06:27 PM PDT by randog (What the...?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Everytime I see this type of thing mentioned I remember an old Laugh-In "News of the Future" about President Ronald Reagan (considered funny, since he was only governor of California at the time. even funnier to me, since I saw this episode in '87 when he was president) deciding to do a trial run of marijuana as a fuel alternative. At last report it is unsure if it really made a difference in pollution, but no one really seemed to care.


5 posted on 04/23/2006 9:06:51 PM PDT by HungarianGypsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

10 posted on 04/23/2006 9:13:08 PM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (http://ntxsolutions.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

It can also be used to make rope. You know... for that rope shortage... we have.


12 posted on 04/23/2006 9:17:15 PM PDT by CzarNicky (The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Pathetic!


15 posted on 04/23/2006 9:19:48 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
I don't personally see anything wrong with Hemp. The good Lord gave it to us, IMHO we should smoke it... er I mean use it.
17 posted on 04/23/2006 9:20:23 PM PDT by Vote 4 Nixon (EAT...FISH...SLEEP...REDUX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

just an attempt by the pro-legalization crowd to latch on to the energy crisis to get their drugs legalized.


18 posted on 04/23/2006 9:21:33 PM PDT by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

The best crop for an alternative fuel has already been identified - switchgrass. Pres. Bush was ridiculed for including it in his SOTU address, but he is right. It traps the maximum amount of CO2 below ground, provides far more energy than corn above ground, and is environmentally friendly and costs less to grow. The only reason we don't use it now is corn subsidies have provided an over-capacity for corn (and an over-incentive to grow it).

And as far as I know, smoking it doesn't turn you into a lazy moron.


19 posted on 04/23/2006 9:23:12 PM PDT by KingKenrod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
I'm curious..

Almost every implementation of biodiesel I've read about advocates at maximum a twenty percent blend. Reducing our use of diesel fuel by 25% wouldn't deeply affect our dependence on foreign oil.

Six percent of the land area of the United States is a pretty significant amount. That's what, the size of Texas? I'm pretty sure that's more than the total amount of field coverage for alfalfa, corn and wheat combined.
21 posted on 04/23/2006 9:23:40 PM PDT by kingu (Yeah, I'll vote in 2006, just as soon as a party comes along who listens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

The Greenies have started their campaigns and are out to convince everyone we can grow (looking for agriculture subsidies, hello) our way out of energy demands in spite of global demands.

Said another way, imagine the plethora of new ways to tax you and re-distribute that wealth in the form of bigger gubmint and higher spending.


23 posted on 04/23/2006 9:25:53 PM PDT by quantim (If the Constitution were perfect, it wouldn't have included the Senate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Hemp Executives

26 posted on 04/23/2006 9:35:08 PM PDT by stinkerpot65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Maybe instead of deisigning tasteless tomatos that ship well, we can use our scientific rescorces to design a variety of hemp that produces a much larger yield of fuel per plant. Hemp can be used to make paper as well, is this not correct?


28 posted on 04/23/2006 9:37:02 PM PDT by wolfman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Whatever we do we must end our dependence on foreign oil, our 60 year pact with the devil and the resulting realpolitk that has gone with it. Further, it constitutes an easily disrupted supply line an equally easy corruption of our principles and ideals. Either we just kick arab ass and take their gas or we become self sustaining and bow to no one. Thereafter, if we want to make a point with China, Iran, N Korea, et al., we can always park several tarmacs in the straights of Hormuz.


29 posted on 04/23/2006 9:39:44 PM PDT by HockeyPop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....


43 posted on 04/24/2006 5:06:29 AM PDT by VaBthang4 ("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

What was the question again?


45 posted on 04/24/2006 5:21:51 AM PDT by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

New DNA 'Fingerprinting' Technique Separates Hemp From Marijuana

Using new DNA "fingerprinting" techniques, two University of Minnesota researchers have become the first to unequivocally separate hemp plants from marijuana plants with genetic markers. Hemp, a crop grown for durable fiber and nutritious seed, and marijuana, the most abundant illegal drug of abuse in the United States, both belong to the species Cannabis sativa. They differ in levels of the psychoactive drug tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) but are otherwise difficult to tell apart. The technique holds promise for distinguishing different cultivars (domesticated plant lines) in U.S. criminal cases. It may also prove useful in countries where the cultivation of hemp is permitted but marijuana is illegal, as in Canada and Europe. The work appears in the March issue (volume 51, No. 2) of the Journal of Forensic Science.


46 posted on 04/24/2006 6:02:43 AM PDT by Ron/GA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Groovy.


47 posted on 04/24/2006 6:03:40 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
The hypocrisy of liberals and environmental groups, combined with globalist conspirators, Big Petroleum, and government law enforcement groups and bureaucrats, have turned a blind eye to the most feasible solution that could solve all of our energy woes.

You folks continue to ignore the pr/gallon economics will all these statements.

If and when we get comfortable with 4-5 dollars per gallon gas without raising taxes, and the real true cost of the product, not the speculative value, grows to this high level, then and only then will agricultural products be able to compete.

We are not there yet, and have a long way to go. Even now, with the cheapest Ag alternative being ethanol, it has to be subsidized to be produced.

So forget it!

48 posted on 04/24/2006 6:10:57 AM PDT by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson