Skip to comments.
Paul v Clinton - Hillary Clinton's sworn declaration (she sets up Chelsea for perjury)
HillCAP.org ^
| 4-23-06
| Doug from Upland
Posted on 04/23/2006 8:29:21 PM PDT by doug from upland
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-179 last
To: doug from upland
My intent was not to diminish the responsibility the Clintons bear in this matter. They are the real villains here. I agree that everything you said in your post sounds very plausible and I thank you for all your hard work tracking all this stuff down.
I merely tried to point out that if one engages in illegal activities with the former first family, one should not be surprised when either of them back-stabs him.
And make no mistake about it, giving money to Hillary in return for something her husband might do IS illegal.
I also found it ironic that in his letter he calls his former anticommunist past a "misjudgment" while he describes the illegal behavior of a couple of modern-day communists!
To: mwilli20
Okay, fair enough. Peter did not think he was engaging in illegal activity when he paid for a series of events for Hillary's campaign. In fact, the only thing that made the donations illegal was the failure of her campaign to report them properly.
Of course, the president cannot make a business deal and quid pro quo while he is president. As we know, however, it is done all the time. Peter had wanted to find a way to approach a soon to be departing president to act as a rainmaker. I don't like the fact that it was Clinton, but Peter had a duty to the shareholders to try to make the company worth as much as possible.
They did not have a written agreement. They did, however, have an understanding. Ed Rendell, among others, induced Peter to contribute to Al Gore and to Hillary. He also contributed to Gray Davis. Large companies usually hedge their bets by giving to both parties. That group engaged in a conspiracy to take his money with no intent to ever help his company. That is the conspiracy. It was Rendell and his gang who told Peter that the way to have any access to the president was to support his wife. He was told in no uncertain terms that such was the cost of admission. With his business advisor Jim Levin, Clinton actually was responsible for wrecking Peter's company.
Peter will have to speak for himself regarding a "misjudgment" statment. I think the misjudgment was trusting people who came to him and said we need your help in pulling a sting on Castro. At the time, Peter represented six South American governments. He agreed to join the sting and attempt to cause a serious rift between Castro and his Soviet benefactors, who were being overcharged by Castro for black market coffee.
162
posted on
04/26/2006 11:08:19 AM PDT
by
doug from upland
(Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
To: satchmodog9
I can see the NYT headlines now
Partisan Judge - Another Rightwing Neocon attack on the Saints Clinton.
163
posted on
04/27/2006 8:10:30 AM PDT
by
Holicheese
(Stanley Cup's new home will be North Carolina!)
To: A CA Guy
If I was Chelsea, I would just say that I was so strung out on coke that I got from Bill, I don't know anything.
I agree, this goes no where fast. The MSM will never mention it.
164
posted on
04/27/2006 8:19:17 AM PDT
by
Holicheese
(Stanley Cup's new home will be North Carolina!)
To: DoughtyOne
"Poor Chelsea. The kid sure got blindsided by these two jackasses." The problem is that her parents don't know to teach any better. She may not even know right from wrong not having been taught.
165
posted on
04/27/2006 8:20:19 AM PDT
by
WorkerbeeCitizen
(I think - Therefore I am Conservative)
To: doug from upland
"Peter who??? Oh, was that the guy discussing business for several hours at our table after the gala?"
That's John Travolta standing at the table.
166
posted on
04/27/2006 8:26:25 AM PDT
by
Preachin'
(Enoch's testimony was that he pleased God: Why are we still here?)
To: Preachin'
Yes, and Travolta is on the witness list. Brad Pitt was supposed to sit at that table, but Travolta wanted the spot (or I think he would not have come). Pitt graciously agreed to sit at another table with his new bride, the one before the African wedding and mohawk hairdo.
167
posted on
04/27/2006 8:29:33 AM PDT
by
doug from upland
(Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
To: doug from upland
I hate it, but Hillary is already on the 2008 presidential ticket for the democrats.
Breaking the law is basically a requirement for getting on a democrat ticket nowadays. Bill Clinton got away with enough to send me to jail for 1,000 years.
Sandy Burglar was caught with classified material, and he didn't even make the front page.
Hillary's only goal is to present herself as a centrist/moderate to the uninformed voters. Pushing for a border fence and supporting the president in the Iraq invasion scored a lot of points for her.
I'd love to see her criminal activities exposed, but it will avail nothing.
168
posted on
04/27/2006 8:43:46 AM PDT
by
Preachin'
(Enoch's testimony was that he pleased God: Why are we still here?)
To: Preachin'
169
posted on
04/27/2006 9:38:34 AM PDT
by
doug from upland
(Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
To: WorkerbeeCitizen
You may be right. Heck, I doubt this kid spent much time with either of them when you get down to it. Kids are rather resiliant too. Look at what our schools put them through and they still wind up conservative.
I'm not discounting your thought. It could very well be true.
170
posted on
04/27/2006 11:18:49 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(The United 'Door Mats' of America! Go ahead, scrape your feet on it. Everyone else is.)
To: doug from upland
Is ALL of that documented fact or just theory?
To: Lee'sGhost
The fax is true. There were actually several of them that came from Rosen. The sending of the additional money is true. The photo on Sept. 27, 2000 is true. Yes, this is what happened. While attacking Peter publicly, behind the scenes they wanted more money and told him everything would be fine.
172
posted on
04/27/2006 11:56:56 AM PDT
by
doug from upland
(Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
To: Blurblogger
From the genius of Blurblogger ---
173
posted on
04/27/2006 11:58:01 AM PDT
by
doug from upland
(Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
To: doug from upland; PhilDragoo; Zacs Mom; Boazo; speedy; bitt; onyx
I did NOT, I repeat, did NOT have Photoshop with that woman!
174
posted on
04/27/2006 12:10:29 PM PDT
by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media & NUKE the DNC Class Action Temper Tantrum!)
To: Blurblogger
LOL --- gawd, I hope not.
175
posted on
04/27/2006 12:11:23 PM PDT
by
onyx
(MARY MC CHRISTMAS everybody! --- FACTS DON'T MATTER.)
To: Holicheese
Sounds like a plan to me.
176
posted on
04/27/2006 11:32:33 PM PDT
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: doug from upland
177
posted on
04/28/2006 3:43:31 PM PDT
by
Pagey
(The Clintons ARE the true definition of the word WRETCHED!)
To: doug from upland
178
posted on
04/29/2006 10:54:34 PM PDT
by
1035rep
To: All
179
posted on
06/25/2007 8:26:34 AM PDT
by
doug from upland
(Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-179 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson