Posted on 04/22/2006 6:39:20 AM PDT by wagglebee
Everybody's playing the blame game these days. The current target is Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, who seems to be standing in for President Bush the man who his enemies say is responsible for everything that's gone wrong since the Biblical flood. ("Bush lied about the need to build an ark.")
South of our borders we have a nut job running oil-rich Venezuela and threatening to do all kinds of nasty things to us. In North Korea we have another nut job building nukes and rattling sabers, and in Iran there's still another whacked-out leader threatening to blow Israel off the map, for starters.
Believe me, Rummy had nothing to do with any of that. Nor did George Bush. If you're looking for someone to point the finger at, look no further than James Earl Carter. Every one of these problems can be laid at the door of the Georgia peanut farmer and self-anointed evangelist for world peace, understanding, good-will, and promoter of universal love-ins with dictators who hate us.
Let's begin with Iran, a boiling cauldron of hatred for everything associated with Western civilization. Recall that when Jimmah took office Iran was ruled by a strong ally of the United States, the Shah. Like most Middle Eastern potentates, the Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, ruled with an iron hand. Under him, Iran was not the kind of democracy we're now promoting for the Middle East.
The Shah, however, was also the staunch friend and ally of the United States. He saw to it that the oil kept flowing in our direction, and kept his military in good-enough shape to protect our interests in the area.
But the Shah somehow offended Brother Carter's exalted view of the inherent goodness of a mankind freed from the strictures imposed by dictatorial rules. With a wink and a nod, he arranged to have Pahlavi replaced by an exiled mullah - the Ayatollah Khomeini - who in Carter's view would be a moderate leader who would democratize Iran.
What Carter got for us was a Muslim fanatic seething with hatred for everything Western, who without blinking an eye spat on our national sovereignty when he took over the United States embassy in Tehran and held 52 American hostages for 444 days, until the U.S. came to its senses and elected my dad Ronald Reagan to replace the hapless Jimmy Carter.
Thanks to Carter, Iran today constitutes a grave threat to the United States and to world peace. He allowed the creation of an Islamic Republic bent on imposing the most repressive form of Islam on the entire world.
Then we can turn to Venezuela, now locked in the grip of a Castro-clone and fervent communist Hugo Chavez, who is creating a heavily armed communist dictatorship on our southern doorstep. When Chavez faced a recall election Cater was on hand to monitor the election, which turned out to be rigged to elect Chavez from the very start. Despite overwhelming evidence that the Chavez victory was the result of rampant vote fraud, Mr. Carter put his stamp of approval on it, declaring it to have been fair and honest. Carter kept Chavez in office.
In 1994, when Bill Clinton was facing down North Korea's Kim Il-Sung, father of current dictator Kim Jong-Il, he sent Carter to strike a deal on his development of nuclear technology. Speaking of the dying murderous dictator, Carter said he found him "vigorous, intelligent, surprisingly well-informed about the technical issues, and in charge of the decisions about this country," and added, "I don't see the [North Koreans] are an outlaw nation."
The deal Carter made allowed the North Koreans to work behind the scenes to build nuclear weapons which now threaten world peace. When he came back from North Korea he told CNN's Judy Woodruff, "I think it's all roses now..."
I agree with Jack Kinsella who once wrote in the Omega Letter Daily Intelligence Digest that "... Jimmy Carter holds the hands-down record for being the worst ex-president the United States has ever known. His post-presidential meddling in foreign affairs has cost America dearly, both in terms of international credibility and international prestige."
Amen
I beg your pardon, but I must disagree. Figuring out exactly what went wrong, and who made it go wrong, is the first step in fixing a solution.
Knowing, for example, that trusting anti-American dictators leads to more trouble is HUGELY important in making future decisions. For decades we've let the Left howl at us for "propping up undemocratic regimes" merely because they were friendly to us. Well, now we see what happens when we abandon that tactic. This makes it much easier to defend our earlier stance. And in case you can't tell, when we lose our confidence in our moral authority to act on our own behalf, we lose our will to fight for our survival.
Look at the two presidents the left have given us over the last thirty years, Carter and Clinton. I rest my case.
Carter: Iran, Panama Canal, North Korea, Hugo Chavez
Carter should be in a straight jacket with his leg chained to a table somewhere we'll never know about. This man's ignorance knows no bounds.
Johnson sure gets a pass doesn't he.
Carter wins first place as the worst president in a long, long time and he is in first place as the worst ex-president ever.
Hey, he won the Silver Star. Just like Kerry.
"... Jimmy Carter holds the hands-down record for being the worst ex-president the United States has ever known.
_________________________________________________________
Also the worst president in modern times
Fingerpointing and fault laying accomplishes exactly zero.
__________________________________________________________
You have a good point, but in this case little jimmie(lower case intended) just will not stop coddling anti-American despots. I will continue my sweet revenge on the incompetent jerk.
How else do you explain his perpetual pucker ?
Both ends? Ugh! How can I wash that thought out of my brain?
"Carter was the worst president in my lifetime, followed by LBJ, followed by Slick.
What do they have in common?"
Besides the fact all three have served as President... they are ALL anti-American d!ckheads?!
LLS
They were elected by the American people?
Well I think slickwillie CAN hold a candle to Carter, but Carter still wins.
People knew what we were getting with slickwillie, but Carter --even today-- tries to hide behind the born-again facade. Carter wants a very weak U.S. among the nations of the world and never met a dictator he didn't adore.
In the United States, people aren't "put in the clink" solely for remarks made.
I'm just sayin'
Ramzi Al-Clark is definitely high on that list as well.
Now you're getting at the heart of the problem...
They were all Southern Democrats. They also found themselves President b/c of unusual circumstances- Carter got in solely b/c of Watergate (he narrowly defeated Gerald Ford). Of course, LBJ became President when JFK was assassinated. Clinton was elected with the Perot effect.
So what you are calling for, is a formal campaign against ANY Presidential candidate that has the letter "J" anywhere within their name.
H-I-L-L-A-R-Y-R-O-D-H-A-M-C-L-I-N-T-O-N
Nope, no letter "J" anywhere. You sure there isn't another factor in there somewhere?
Thank YOU Jimmah!
And welcome to FR!
Now get lost.
he (Khomeini) took over the United States embassy in Tehran
OMG, I didn't realize this. That's technically an act of war, and Jimmuh did nothing but shake his tiny little white fist. Great.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.