Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russian bombers flew undetected across Arctic - AF commander
http://en.rian.ru/russia/20060422/46792049.html ^

Posted on 04/22/2006 5:10:10 AM PDT by RusIvan

MOSCOW, April 22 (RIA Novosti) - Russian military planes flew undetected through the U.S. zone of the Arctic Ocean to Canada during recent military exercises, a senior Air Force commander said Saturday.

The commander of the country's long-range strategic bombers, Lieutenant General Igor Khvorov, said the U.S. Air Force is now investigating why its military was unable to detect the Russian bombers.

"They were unable to detect the planes either with radars or visually," he said.

Khorov said that during the military exercises in April, Tu-160 Blackjack bombers and Tu-95 Bears had successfully carried out four missile launches. Bombing exercises were held using Tu-22 Blinders.

By the end of the year, two more Tu-160s will be commissioned for the long-range strategic bomber fleet, Khorov said.

Both new planes will incorporate numerous upgrades from the initial Soviet models, the commander said. The bombers will be able to launch both cruise missiles and aviation bombs, and communicate via satellite.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: canada; cccp; coldwar2; communism; exercise; kgb; military; norad; northcom; putin; russia; russianmilitary; sovietunion; usaf; ussr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last
To: RusIvan

I will tell you one last time because I know you like to use word games like most of the russian leadership. Russia is helping Iran with nuclear material and technical know how. Whether it is fissile material to make a nuclear weapon or just enough to make a radioactive dirty bomb is moot. Iran sits on top of a sea of oil so they dont need nuclear power for a few centuries at least.What does matter is if some radioactive device is used against the US or our intrest then all the parties involved will be held to account. This includes the Russians.China and Russia are allowing this to happen by blocking any action in the UN security council. They both know it destabilizes the oil rich region and buffers US/EU and the wests power. Once a radioactive attack or the nukes start flying the US will take the kid gloves off and do what we been waiting for since the beginning of the cold war. Russia/china/and Iran are playing with the very existence of mankind. We had a balance with nukes after the cold war now this little game they are playing may eventually start ww3 after years of trying to deter it. You may be happy to stick it to the US now but the outcome of this could be bad for all humans.


81 posted on 04/23/2006 8:35:39 AM PDT by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

Russian design is crude.A russian may have developed a lower RCS formula years ago, thats great. We have had stealth tech since the 80's. Russia still doesnt have a stealth aircraft and needs the Indians help for funding. Pathetic.


82 posted on 04/23/2006 8:42:33 AM PDT by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: rodeocowboy
Where's our intel going?Up and down depending on need.
83 posted on 04/23/2006 8:44:49 AM PDT by ASA Vet (Those who know don't talk. Those who talk don't know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

Maybe you just enough to have your grudge with you but I try to clear things for you. Maybe it will help if you have open mind of cause. If not then my attempt is futile.

Russia is helping Iran with nuclear material and technical know how. ==

Russia supply Iran with energy reactor which stay now without nuclier fuel until Iran sign the agrrement that it will return all burnt fule back to Russia for perocessing.

RUSSIA DO NOT HELP IRAN WITH NO TECHNOILOGY FOR ENRICHMENT OF URANIUM. Period.

It is even in Russia own interest because Russia wants to make money many years ahead by selling Iran fresh nuclier fuel. So fuel technology which is indeed is the technology of enrichment is out of Iran reach.
Russia will NOT give it not only to Iran but to United States either. You should know that Russia alone has technology for reprocessing burnt fuel. United States, France and Britain all just stockpiled burnt fuel and make fresh form from new uranium matherial. But Russia do not this. Russia extract plutonium and make fresh fuel out of burnt.

Iran sits on top of a sea of oil so they dont need nuclear power for a few centuries at least.==

This question was interesting me too. And I find the answer. I red the interview of iranian minister of oil. He said that they consider it as the squandering of oil if they burn oil for electricity. It is more profitable to sell in to West but produce electricity from nuclier.

I agree with him because here in Russia we have lot of oil but anyways we develop further nuclier power plants. Same way it is very stupid to burn oil for electricity when you may produce it in ample quantity much much cheaper and which is important without polutions of atmosphere.

They both know it destabilizes the oil rich region and buffers US/EU and the wests power. ==

Those who REALLY distabilising that region are those who wage wars in it. Isn't it right? IMHO the waging the war is EXTREME destabilizing compare with someone words or undercover deeds.

Once a radioactive attack or the nukes start flying the US will take the kid gloves off and do what we been waiting for since the beginning of the cold war.==

Radioactive attack by missile is not possible on US land. Iran simply do not have such missiles now. Later there will be ABM so it will be impossible either.
Anyway if Iran will do such thing I beleive no one objects if US "takes the kid gloves off" on Iran.

We had a balance with nukes after the cold war now this little game they are playing may eventually start ww3 after years of trying to deter it.==

We still have the balance today and will have at many years to come. So the deterence will continue to be there. Russia won't allow no military advantages over her from anyone. Remember Russia today is more stronger then USSR was. Her people is united as nobefore.
She always will have some nasty things in her sleeves which will bring "unacceptable losses" to any possible aggressor. It is her policy for all times. In other words any attack on Russia will be suicidal for agressor country.

You may be happy to stick it to the US now but the outcome of this could be bad for all humans.==

I don't happy to stick it in US. I lived in US and I very like this country. But my love is Russia.
And I don't agree that US behaives as world policeman. No one appointed her on this role. It is self appontement. So all proceeds of it which US gets is her problems now.

I beleive that Russia won't listen dictates. She will just answer "go to hell" and do what ever she chooses. She is too independent to follow someones lead.
Go talk with Ukraine and Georgia. They will lick your ass with eager. But not Russia. Amen:)


84 posted on 04/23/2006 9:16:28 AM PDT by RusIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

Russia still doesnt have a stealth aircraft and needs the Indians help for funding. Pathetic.==

May be pathetic for you. But I won't open the sceret for you if tell you taht Ufimtsev designed firstly was accessed by soviet military designer. And turned down beacuse they knew taht Ufimtsev design may be stealth only in very narrow band of electomagnetic emmitions.

For example. Old soviet radars which works on meter wave length see "stealth" aircraft with same easy as ordinary aircraft. Russian anti-aircraft system use such radar for early warnings. For fine targeting they use bgger freauwancie. But at that stage when you alredy know wher those stealth are, the narrow beam pointed to tagret directly will make reflection no matter stealthy or unstealthy.
So no american "stealth" aircraft will be stealthy over Russia:). Recall U-2 and colonel Powers. They told then that that soveit missile cann't shoot him down. But it happened. Don't make same mistake twice:).


85 posted on 04/23/2006 9:25:06 AM PDT by RusIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan
Recall U-2 and colonel Powers. They told then that that soveit missile cann't shoot him down. But it happened.

After what, four years of flights? Credit the Russians for being persistent.

86 posted on 04/23/2006 9:28:03 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan

You sound just like the Chicoms. Im done trying to talk sense into a russian nationlist.


87 posted on 04/23/2006 9:54:39 AM PDT by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

Comment #88 Removed by Moderator

To: RusIvan

Please explain these happenings:

1. The Topel-M Missile
2. MiG 1.44 project (Knock off of F-22)
3. Plasma Stealth
4. SU-47 Stealth fighter
5. Russian unwillingness to obey disarmement treaties
7. Russia arming every communist, islamist, and other two bit dictator under the sun.


89 posted on 04/23/2006 1:47:10 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: bkepley; RusIvan
Maybe since the cold war ended we've got some rusting of our own.

Seriously, I suspect that truth is more scary or more silly (depending on your attitude): the military/governments all over the world are less efficient than they pretend to be.

Do you remember this small civilian plane that landed on Red Square? Or do you remember 9/11 bombers who flew the slow and large civilian planes over East Coast?!

90 posted on 04/24/2006 3:49:28 AM PDT by A. Pole (Solzhenitsyn:"Live Not By Lies" www.columbia.edu/cu/augustine/ arch/solzhenitsyn/livenotbylies.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan
I think the main question is ..
Why are they carrying out a simulated attack on the United States?
We do military exercises with them, dismantle our defenses.

They have built new ICBM's, increased their long range bomber fleet and now practice an airspace intrusion.

What is wrong with this picture?
91 posted on 04/24/2006 4:41:58 AM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan

>When you grew up and stop call Russians as "commies". >Today Russia is less commie then Europian Union.

Yeah, tell that to Putin restoring KGB leaders monuments and saying USSR was a "great" country and a big loss..

COMMIES & KGB still in Russia..



92 posted on 04/24/2006 7:19:38 AM PDT by b2stealth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

I see you met one of the KGB officers working on FR?
Don't be scared, he will go away eventually.
His job is to sit in Moscow and spread disinformation.

We all know who supplied Iraq with intel, who invited HAMAS, who gave HAMAS $11,000,000, who sold Top-M1, S300, AK47 to Iran, who is building nuclear reactors in Iran.

You don't have to look far, just watch Putin speak on Russian TV and you will hear that "terrorists are not a problem, but those old traditional enemies of Russia who stand behind their back are" guess who is he talking about? That's right US of A.

And for all KGB trolls here we say - IDI HA X** TOVARISCH!


93 posted on 04/24/2006 7:28:54 AM PDT by b2stealth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Jaxter

Damn.

Now why does that TU-160 look so much liek our B1?

Hmmmmmmmmm........


94 posted on 04/24/2006 7:30:34 AM PDT by roaddog727 (eludium PU36 explosive space modulator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan

Isn't our SAC disbanded? When the US stopped flying strategic bombers is it possible that we believed the enemy would also? Do we also believe that in an age of ICBMs and cruise missiles that no one would bother with intercontinental strategic bombing missions?

Or, is this the beginning of developing a bombing strategy to deal with Iran? Does the AF argue that we need more AWACs in the air and command and control ships to direct the campaign and the only way to not signal our intentions is to have a plausible reason to put them up, because if they are up KC 135s will have to be up as well as we couldn't launch a mission without them. I don't think this time we would want to signal our intentions in advance.


95 posted on 04/24/2006 7:43:30 AM PDT by Final Authority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b2stealth

You don't have to look far, just watch Putin speak on Russian TV and you will hear that "terrorists are not a problem, but those old traditional enemies of Russia who stand behind their back are" guess who is he talking about? That's right US of A. ==

Please give us the refs of Such Putin speeches. Or just admit that you just petty lier.

And for all KGB trolls here we say - IDI HA X** TOVARISCH!
==

A ti idi NA dva:). Odin - vdogonku a drugoi - navstrechu:))).


96 posted on 04/24/2006 9:17:34 AM PDT by RusIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan

>Please give us the refs of Such Putin speeches. Or just admit that you just petty lier.

Go study Putin's 'Beslan' speech..

Don't you have some people to torture? KGB mraz..


97 posted on 04/24/2006 10:51:37 AM PDT by b2stealth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
Bingo! Stealth technology is not that difficult, and may have been retrofitted on older aircraft (a skin of radar absorbent material, diffusion screens over turbine blades, etc.). You'd still get them on radar eventually, they'd just get a whole lot closer, maybe within cruise missile range.

There's more to stealth technology than just the material. The shape of the plane matters a lot too. Note how angular and awkward the stealth planes like the F-117 and to a lesser degree, the F-22 are. Their surfaces are designed to not be round to guarantee that the radar signals are deflected away from the source.

Besides, retrofitting a Bear with stealth material would make it so heavy that it probably wouldn't even have the range to do this, at least not with any worthwhile payload.

For stealth technology to work effectively, the plane has to be built from the ground up as a stealth plane.

98 posted on 04/24/2006 5:43:02 PM PDT by Zhangliqun (Hating Bush does not count as a strategy for defeating Islamic terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: b2stealth

Don't you have some people to torture? KGB mraz..==

You really troubled man. You need to go to see psycological help.


99 posted on 04/25/2006 1:09:03 AM PDT by RusIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Final Authority

Since when did the US stop flying strategic bombers? The US still flys B-52s and B-2s as part of the strategic force. They still practice long range global reach missions to this day.


100 posted on 04/28/2006 9:43:05 AM PDT by Tommyjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson