 |
Posted on 04/21/2006 11:56:05 AM PDT by Incorrigible
|
Loosened Family Ties Haunt Baby Boomer Vanguard Reaching Age 60BY KATHLEEN O'BRIEN |
At first, the only thing setting the earliest baby boomers apart was their sheer number.
They acted much like their parents' generation when it came to life's milestones. By age 20, nearly half of the first wave of boomers were married. Once married, they started having children.
The similarity ended there.
Now, as the boomers born in 1946 reach age 60, they have experienced more family disruption than their parents could have imagined. Love has been a bumpy journey.
As a result, they head into their senior years far more likely to be divorced, remarried, cohabiting or living alone. Demographers warn such disruption could leave this generation with weaker family ties, making them more vulnerable as they age and need help.
"Many of these ties are going to be frail," says Mary Elizabeth Hughes, a Duke University sociologist who has studied the boomers. "They don't have the glue that previous ties did."
While every generation has seen some of its members divorce, remarry or live alone, those numbers are all bigger for the group Hughes calls the "early boomers," those born from 1946 to 1955.
Consider Jim and Claudia Burns of Whippany, N.J. These two "class of '46" boomers have five marriages between them. She's on her third; he's on his second.
Claudia isn't exactly proud of her two previous divorces, but she isn't ashamed of them, either. "I have a theory," she says philosophically. "I believe I needed a different husband for each stage of my life. I feel like there was a reason for each person."
As she and Jim approach their third wedding anniversary this June, she says emphatically: "This time is it. We just know it."
Sociologist Hughes says of the 1946-55 babies, "We're rewriting the books here":
-- They are twice as likely to live alone as their parents' generation. While the percentage is not huge -- just 11 percent -- it reflects a striking break with the past.
Hughes is quick to say she doesn't equate living alone with being lonely, or being without support. "You could be living alone but you could have tons of friends filling the gap. Living alone is only one piece of the puzzle -- a huge piece. But other social connections matter, too," she says. "When living alone becomes a problem is if you need help."
-- By age 40, a third of early boomer women were divorced. By contrast, only 13 percent of their parents' generation were divorced by that age.
It is a myth, however, that early boomers began the divorce revolution. Their older siblings, the War Babies of 1936-45, were the generation that actually led the upsurge in divorce. But early boomers then went on to surpass them. (And their rate was topped in turn by the younger boomers, those born 1956-64.)
Many of those divorced boomers remarried -- but not all. "Remarriage rates for them are on the high side, but not high enough to compensate for all the divorces," Hughes says.
-- Raised to look on cohabitation as "shacking up," early boomers nonetheless came to adopt living together as an acceptable way to form a family. Even in middle age, 4 percent were living with non-relatives; the figure was a paltry 1 percent for their parents.
"It simply wasn't in people's repertoire," Hughes says. "Now, however, people view it as an option." With the children grown, couples no longer need marriage to confer legitimacy on their offspring, and they may well want to remain single to protect pension benefits or inheritances. (An unknown amount of the cohabiting reflects gay relationships.)
By far the most common living arrangement for those turning 60 this year is the traditional one: living with one's spouse. In the 2000 Census, such a family configuration accounted for 61 percent of early boomer households -- an 11 percent drop from their parents at that same stage in life.
While some of those are second or even third marriages, many are couples still in first marriages and coming up on their 40th anniversaries.
Claudia Burns, the boomer now on her third -- "and last!" -- marriage, says her first husband was instrumental in helping her reach her goal of becoming a teacher. He was from what she describes as "the right side of the tracks," and his mother was a teacher.
That marriage foundered 10 years later as she felt his support wane. By then, the couple had two children. It took her only six months to decide on divorce; it didn't occur to her to try marriage counseling. "In hindsight, I didn't give him a chance," she says.
Her second marriage lasted 25 years -- many of them unhappy as strains developed over her "warm and fuzzy" mate's de facto role as a househusband. Still, she resisted divorce for years until it was obvious counseling had failed.
"I thought, `Two is bad. I am not going to be divorced again. I am not going to be Elizabeth Taylor!"' she says.
She and Jim met when she was a last-minute guest at a friend's New Year's Eve party in Atlanta, where she lived at the time. Jim was there visiting his adult children and had a flight home the next day. He called her that evening -- and every day they were apart since then. Their long-distance courtship was high-tech, with Saturday night "dates" on the Internet, using web cameras.
This time, she believes, she has finally gotten it right -- both in her choice of mate and in her expectations. "We haven't had a single fight," she says.
The level of divorce experienced by the early boomers is worrisome, Hughes says, because marital status affects both health and wealth.
Married people live longer. The divorced are at greater risk for health problems, even after remarriage. Demographers call it divorce's "health scar." Finances take a big hit as well, as the family's assets are spread over two households.
The concern is that such continued churning of family roles may make some extended families less likely to help once old age sets in.
Will adult children look after an elderly step-parent with the same devotion they would show a parent? If Mom remarries, then dies, will her children feel obliged to look after her second husband?
If the remarriage took place when the children were small, the resulting bonds may be as strong as blood ties, Hughes says. But if the remarriage happens after the kids have left the nest, what then?
In some divorces, the father ends up seeing far less of his children -- a problem that has always been viewed from the perspective of the needs of the child. But what about later in life, when the tables turn?
"We're used to thinking about dads who abandon their kids," Hughes says. "Well, when those guys are old, they're not going to have their kids around to help."
Compounding that worry is speculation that boomers may continue their pattern of "serial monogamy" even as they become senior citizens.
Divorce is traditionally rare among the elderly; the stress of child-rearing is over, and any marriage lasting so long is likely to be hearty anyway. So there is reason to believe the oldest boomers are done with divorce.
Yet that may be an outdated assumption. After all, says Hughes, this generation upended expectations at every stage of life. It may continue to divorce, remarry or cohabit well into old age.
Claudia Burns is sure she won't be one of those, in part because each of her two previous divorces taught her essential lessons about marriage. "This time, when we married, we didn't try to change each other," she says.
April 21, 2006
(Kathleen O'Brien is a staff writer for The Star-Ledger of Newark, N.J. She can be contacted at kobrien@starledger.com.)
Not for commercial use. For educational and discussion purposes only.
And according to most studies, Baby Boomers do not have sufficient savings to last them for their expected lifetimes given that they will still likely see 65 as a retirement point.
Then you have the the above confusion about who's kids are going to take care of who; when in fact, the kids are going to be working so hard to pay taxes to support all these Boomers that they won't have time to take care of them!
Woe Is Me, Me, Me [Generation X/Reagan]
As ye sow, so shall ye reap!
I would be very wary of marrying anyone already twice divorced. Of course the advantage is that as people age, I think their expectations wrt a spouse are more realistic (lower?). Good luck to her and her third husband!
A very telling comment, which I think encapsulates the problem with those who identify themselves as "boomers" (which is not everybody born during that time period, btw).
This is essentially an "all about me" mentality that reached its pinnacle with people like Bill Clinton and Newt Gingrich.
X gen kids expect parents to make it on Social Security.
Look closer and you'll see the left's destructive take over during the 50s, 60s, and 70s, was led by the WWII generation, not a bunch of children and teenagers.
Now that they need the family, they regret having destoryed it when it was convenient for them.
Is this suppossed to be a sign of a healthy relationship to her? Man, no wonder she has had so many husbands. Sounds like she still has a lot of work to do, which means more life stages and according to her she has a new husband for each life stage so . . . I think we all know where this one is heading. Right now she must be going through the "i don't fight with my husband and thus it must be right" life stage. I can't wait until she hits the I am a sinner that is humble before God and I fear his wrath thus I get down on my knees and pray for his forgiveness and guidance each day according to His word stage, although I won't hold my breath.
The level of divorce experienced by the early boomers is worrisome, Hughes says, because marital status affects both health and wealth. Married people live longer. The divorced are at greater risk for health problems, even after remarriage
Maybe the new survival of the fittest! Who would of thunk, way back in the nasty little sixties that the fittest were the one's with the gonies to marry and stay married. It is easy to run away all the time and blame others, maybe this laziness will die out with their species.
As far as the money, I now see these guys in wheelchairs organizing in the streets demanding the richer married folks pay for them to live and get healthcare and their children, knowing they won't inherit anything marching along with them, but only for the money so they can continue to not have jobs and play video games at fifty.
Ping list for the discussion of the politics and social (and sometimes nostalgic) aspects that directly effects Generation Reagan / Generation-X (Those born from 1965-1981) including all the spending previous generations (i.e. The Baby Boomers) are doing that Gen-X and Y will end up paying for.
Freep mail me to be added or dropped. See my home page for details and previous articles.
Love it! LOL. It is so true.
Marriage takes sacrifice and putting someone else's interests first-- something the Me Generation didn't learn. They're reaping what they they sowed.
"Many of these ties are going to be frail," says Mary Elizabeth Hughes, a Duke University sociologist who has studied the boomers. "They don't have the glue that previous ties did."
You make your bed then you sleep in it.
Although Bill has had one long marriage, and Newt's up to number three so far. ;)
"I believe I needed a different husband for each stage of my life. I feel like there was a reason for each person."
It's almost funny that there is no recognition in this remark of ANOTHER person in the union.
Almost...
While thankfully we never get all that we deserve we do have to at least pay part of the bill.
When you treat people as disposable commodities to be used and tossed it will come back to bite you.
Thats where euthanasia will come in!!!!
Don't you mean one long "marriage of convenience"?
Will adult children look after an elderly step-parent with the same devotion they would show a parent?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.